Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dynamics of distribution in animal communities: Theory and analysis

  • Published:
Researches on Population Ecology

Summary

Theoretical and analytical problems of the dynamics of distribution and abundance in animal communities were examined. In many communities, species with low abundance and of limited spatial occurrence (i.e., rare species) typically form a conspicuous peak when a frequency distribution of the number of species is constructed with respect to the proportion of sites occupied within an area of distribution. Models of distribution dynamics, including a new model proposed here, were compared with a range of animal community data using a new procedure to assess single- and bi-modal patterns in frequency distributions of spatial occurrence. Data reveal that single-modality with an excess of rare species occurs more frequently than bimodality. Even when bimodality is detected, the mode representing wide-spread species is in the majority of cases smaller than that for rare species. Thus, a new model in which the rate of local extinctions is assumed to be negatively related to patch occupancy (or population abundance) is in better agreement with observed data than earlier models. Some problems of analysis, in particular model assumptions and testing, are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitchison, J. and J. A. C. Brown (1966)The Lognormal distribution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alford, D. V. (1975)Bumblebees. Davis-Poynter Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anasiewicz, A. (1971) Observations on the bumble-bees in Lublin.Ekol. Pol. 19: 401–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. M., B. D. Turner and L. R. Taylor (ed.) (1979)Population dynamics. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrewartha, H. G. and L. C. Birch (1954)The distribution and abundance of animals. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begon, M., J. L. Harper and C. R. Townsend (1986)Ecology: individuals, populations and communities. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, C. E. (1987) Distribution-abundance relationships of some Arizona landbirds: a matter of scale.Ecology 68: 124–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock, C. E. and L. W. Lepthien (1976) A Christmas count analysis of the Fringillidae.Bird-Banding 47: 263–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, C. E. and R. E. Ricklefs (1983) Range size and local abundance of some North American songbirds: a positive correlation.Am. Nat. 122: 295–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. H. (1984) On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species.Am. Nat. 124: 255–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. H. and A. Kodric-Brown (1977) Turnover rates in insular biogeography: effect of immigration on extinction.Ecology 58: 445–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bush, A. O. and J. C. Holmes (1986) Intestinal helminths of lesser scaup ducks: patterns of association.Can. J. Zool. 64: 132–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, S. L. and S. M. Glenn (1990) A hierarchical analysis of species' abundance patterns in grassland vegetation.Am. Nat. 135: 633–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, S. L. and S. M. Glenn (1991) Importance of spatial and temporal dynamics in species regional abundance and distribution.Ecology 72: 654–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engen, S. (1978)Stochastic abundance models with emphasis on biological communities and species diversity. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A., A. S. Corbet and C. B. Williams (1943) The relation between the number of species and the number of individuals in a random sample from an animal population.J. Anim. Ecol. 12: 42–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston, K. J. and J. H. Lawton (1989) Insect herbivores on bracken do not support the core-satellite hypothesis.Am. Nat. 134: 761–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston, K. J. and J. H. Lawton (1990) Effects of scale and habitat on the relationship between regional distribution and local abundance.Oikos 58: 329–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gause, G. F. (1936) The principles of biocoenology.Q. Rev. Biol. 11: 320–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotelli, N. J. (1991) Metapopulation models: the rescue effect, the propagule rain, and the core-satellite hypothesis.Am. Nat. 138: 768–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotelli, N. J. and D. Simberloff (1987) The distribution and abundance of tallgrass prairie plants: a test of the core-satellite hypothesis.Am. Nat. 130: 18–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I. (1982a) Dynamics of regional distribution: the core and satellite species hypothesis.Oikos 38: 210–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I. (1982b) Communities of bumblebees: testing the core-satellite species hypothesis.Ann. Zool. Fenn. 19: 65–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I. (1982c) Distributional ecology of anthropochorous plants in villages surrounded by forest.Ann. Bot. Fenn. 19: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I. (1991a) Single-species metapopulation dynamics: concepts, models and observations.Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 42: 17–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I. (1991b) Reply to Nee, Gregory and May.Oikos 62: 88–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I. and M. Gilpin (1991) Metapopulation dynamics: brief history and conceptual domain.Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 42: 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hengeveld, R. and J. Haeck (1981) The distribution of abundance. II. Models and implications.Proc. Kon. Nederl. Akad. Wet. C84: 257–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hengeveld, R. and J. Haeck (1982) The distribution of abundance. I. Measurements.J. Biogeogr. 9: 303–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, J. C. (1990) Helminth communities in marine fishes. 101–130. In G. Esch, A. Bush and J. Aho (eds)Parasite Communities: Patterns and Processes. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablonski, D. (1987) Heritability at the species level: analysis of geographical ranges of Cretaceous mollusks.Science (Wash., D. C.) 238: 360–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva, P. (1987) Habitat fragmentation and the stability of predator-prey interactions.Nature (Lond.) 326: 388–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karppinen, E. (1958) Untersuchungen über die Oribatiden (Acari) der Waldböden von Hylocomium-Myrtillus-Typ In Nord-Finnland.Ann. Entomol. Fenn. 24: 149–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, C. R. (1990) Helminth communities in freshwater fish: structured communities or stochastic assemblages? 131–156. In G. Esch, A. Bush and J. Aho (eds)Parasite Communities: Patterns and Processes. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, C. J. (1985)Ecology: the experimental analysis of distribution and abundance. Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R. (1969) Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control.Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 15: 237–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R. (1970) Extinction.Lect. Math. Life Sci. 2: 77–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R. (1971)Evolution in changing environments. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Løken, A. (1973) Studies on Scandinavian bumble bees (Hymenoptera, Apidae).Nor. Entomol. Tidsk. 20: 1–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomnicki, A. (1980) Regulation of population density due to individual differences and patchy environment.Oikos 35: 185–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R. H. and E. O. Wilson (1967)The theory of island biogeography. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, B. A. (1990) The relationship between distribution and abundance in a patchy environment.Oikos,58: 181–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R. M. (1975) Patterns of species abundance and diversity. 81–120. In M. L. Cody and J. M. Diamond (eds)Ecology and Evolution of Communities. Belknap/Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R. M. (ed) (1981)Theoretical ecology: principles and applications. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nee, S., R. D. Gregory and R. M. May (1991) Core and satellite species: theory and artefacts.Oikos 62: 83–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patalas, K. (1971) Crustacean plankton in forty five lakes in the Experimental Lakes Area, northwestern Ontario.J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 28: 231–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, F. W. (1948) The commonness and rarity of species.Ecology 29: 254–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, F. W. (1962) The canonical distribution of commonness and rarity. (Part I and II).Ecology 43: 185–215 and 410–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, F. W. (1981) Pseudo-lognormal distributions.Ecology 62: 355–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raunkiaer, C. (1918) Recherches statistique sur les formations vegetales.Kung. Dan. Videns. Selskol., Biol. Medd. 1: 1–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raunkiaer, C. (1934)The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography. Clarendon, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigler, F. H. and R. R. Langford (1967) Congeneric occurrence of species ofDiaptomus in Southern Ontario lakes.Can. J. Zool. 45: 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden, J. (1974) Population dynamics in a spatially varying environment: how population size “tracks” spatial variation in carrying capacity.Am. Nat. 108: 649–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvertown, J. (1987) Ecological stability: a test case.Am. Nat. 130: 807–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D. (1976) Experimental zoogeography of islands: effects of island size.Ecology 57: 629–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slatkin, M. and M. J. Wade (1978) Group selection on a quantitative character.Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., USA 75: 3531–3534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugihara, G. (1980) Minimal community structure: an explanation of species abundance patterns.Am. Nat. 116: 770–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokeshi, M. (1986a) Population dynamics, life histories and species richness in an epiphytic chironomid community.Freshwat. Biol. 16: 431–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokeshi, M. (1986b) Resource utilization, overlap and temporal community dynamics: a null model analysis of an epiphytic chironomid community.J. Anim. Ecol. 55: 491–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokeshi, M. (1990a) Niche apportionment or random assortment: species abundance patterns revisited.J. Anim. Ecol. 59: 1129–1146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokeshi, M. (1992) Species abundance patterns and community structure.Adv. Ecol. Res. (in press)

  • Tokeshi, M. (1990b) Density-body size allometry doews not exist in a chironomid community onMyriophyllum.Freshwat. Biol. 24: 613–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokeshi, M. and C. R. Townsend (1987) Random patch formation and weak competition: coexistence in an epiphytic chironomid community.J. Anim. Ecol. 56: 833–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. B. (1950) The application of the logarithmic series to the frequency of occurrence of plant species in quadrats.J. Ecol. 38: 107–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. B. (1964)Patterns in the balance of nature and related problems in quantitative ecology. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. H. (1988) Habitat use by bumble bees (Bombus spp.).Ecol. Entomol. 13: 223–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1975)Sociobiology. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland

    Mutsunori Tokeshi

Authors
  1. Mutsunori Tokeshi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tokeshi, M. Dynamics of distribution in animal communities: Theory and analysis. Res Popul Ecol 34, 249–273 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02514796

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02514796

Keywords

Search

Navigation