Skip to main content
Log in

Use of waste materials in the construction industry

Analysis of the RILEM Symposium by Correspondence

  • RILEM Symposia
  • Published:
Matériaux et Construction Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A Symposium by Correspondence has been organised on behalf of RILEM on the use of waste materials and industrial by-products in the construction industry. 18 countries (excluding the UK for which the authors are providing information) submitted contributions and in this paper these contributions are summarised and analysed. Information about individual materials has been extracted from the national contributions and a chapter devoted to each waste in turn. The properties, occurrence, present uses and possible future applications of each waste are described. Blastfurnace slags and pulverised fuel ashes are the two materials which are being used to the greatest extent. Blastfurnace slags are used overall to some 80% of their production and in several countries virtually all that is produced is used and the slags are regarded as a highly satisfactory material. Pulverised fuel ashes are about 20% used overall but up to 70% is used in some countries. Much of these two materials is used as fill but many more sophisticated uses are developing. These materials can make a particular contribution in conserving energy in the manufacture of cementitious materials and of lightweight aggregates. Overall however the proportion of mineral wastes which is used is only about 5% of the production and most is used in relatively low grade applications such as fill in roads and embankments.

The most influential factor in determining whether or not a waste material or by-product is used is the economic cost in comparison with the alternative natural material in a particular application. These costs are primarily made up by handling, processing and transport but the social benefits of using a waste, for example avoiding the dereliction associated with the tipping of a waste material or the quarrying of a natural, should not be forgotten. Possible disbenefits such as pollution arising during processing or a less well proven technical performance should also be taken into account. Adequate knowledge of the properties of the waste materials and products containing them are therefore essential to enable a balanced judgement to be made on the overall advisability of using a waste material in a particular situation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Gutt W. et al.A survey of the locations, disposal and prospective uses of the major industrial by-products and waste materials. BRE Current Paper 19/74, 1974.

  2. Use of waste materials and by-products in road construction. Report of OECD Research Group, Paris, 1977.

  3. Sherwood P. T.The use of waste and low grade materials in road construction: 2. colliery shale. TRRL Lab. Report 649.

  4. Sherwood P. T., Ryley M. D..—The effect of sulphates in colliery shales on its use for roadmaking. TRRL Report LR 324, 1970.

  5. Gratton-Bellew P. E., andEden W. J.Concrete deterioration and floor heave due to biogeochemical weathering of underlying shale. Canadian Geotechnical J., Vol. 12, No. 3, 1975, pp. 372–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nixon P. J.Floor heave in buildings due to the use of pyritic shales as fill material. Chemistry and Industry, 4th March 1978, pp. 160–164.

  7. Expansion of pyritic shales, Candian Building Digest CBD-152.

  8. Fill, Hardcore.—Building Research Establishment Digest (under revision).

  9. RILEM contribution andvon Obering, Piltz G.Grosserprobung von Steinkolklenwaschberge-Zusätzen in mehren Ziegelwerken, Ziegelindustrie, Vol. 6, 1975, pp. 214–215.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Waste materials replacements for highway aggregates. National Co-operative Highway Research Program Report 166, National Research Council, Washington DC, 1976.

  11. Smith M. A., Gutt W.The use of colliery shale as raw material and reductant in the cement/sulphuric acid process. Cement Technology, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1973, pp. 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  12. UK Patent No. 1453641, 1976.

  13. James J. G., Hosking J. R.—British Patent Specification 1241797, 1971.

  14. Collins R. J.A method for measuring the mineralogical variation of spoils from British collieries. Clay Minerals Vol. 11, 1976, pp. 31–50.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fraser C. K., Lake J. R.A laboratory investigation of the physical and chemical properties of burnt colliery shale. TRRL Lab Report LR 125.

  16. Matthews, J. D., Gutt W. H.Studies of fly ash as a cementitious material. Proc. of Conference, “Ash Technology and Marketing”, London, 1978 (to be published).

  17. Influence of alkali content of fly ash on effectiveness in preventing expansion of concrete. Technical Report, No. 6-627, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi, June 1963.

  18. Sherwood P. T.The use of waste and low grade materials in road construction: 3.pulverised fuel ash. TRRL Lab. Report 686, 1975.

  19. Smith M. A.The economic and environmental benefits of increased use of pfa and granulated slag. Ressources Policy, March 1975, pp. 154–170.

  20. Work carried out under contract to BRE (to be published).

  21. Smith M. A.Review of standard specifications for fly ash for use in concrete. BRE Current Paper CP8/75, 1975.

  22. Spratt B. H.The structural use of lightweight aggregate concrete. Cement and Concrete Association, 1974.

  23. Berry E. E.Current availability of fly ash and its use in concrete, in Canada. Paper to CANMET Symposium “Energy and Resource Conservation in the Cement and Concrete Industry”, 8–9th November 1976.

  24. Trief L.The new Trief cement process. Proc. 4th Fly Ash Symp. Saint-Louis, 1976.

  25. Bonnell J. A., Raash E., Whitehead A.Toxicity test of pulverised fuel ash. Central Electricity Generating Board, Nuclear Health and Safety Department Report 147.

  26. Kovach R.The use of thermal powerstation pulversised fuel ash in the manufacture of cement in Hungary. Symposium on use of pfa, Ankara, 9–11 November 1970, BRS Library Communication, No. 1640 (english translation).

  27. Gutt W., Russell A. D.Studies of the system CaO−SiO 2 −Al 2 O 3 −MgO in relation to the stability of blastfurnace slag. J. Math. Sci., Vol. 12, 1977, pp. 1869–1878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gutt W., Kinniburgh W., Newman A. J.Blastfurnace slag as aggregate for concrete. Mag. Concrete Res., Vol. 19, No. 59, June 1967, pp. 71–82;Everett L. H., Gutt W.Steel in concrete with blastfurnace slag aggregate. Ibid, pp. 83–94.Gutt W., Teychenne D. C., Harrison W. H.The use of lighter-weight blastfurnace slag as dense coarse aggregate in concrete. Mag. Concrete Res., Vol. 26, No. 88, September 1974, pp. 123–143.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gutt W., Harrison W. H.Chemical resistance of concrete. BRE Current Paper CP23/77, 1977.

  30. Mather B.Investigations of Portland blastfurnace slag cements. Report 2, Supplementary data. Waterways Experiment Station, US Army Corps of Engineers, Tech. Report 6/445, 1965, pp. 1–61.Preventive measures against alkali-aggregate reaction in concrete. Proc. Symp. of the Research Institute of the (German) cement industry, University of Hamburg, 1973.

  31. Lea F. M.The chemistry of cement and concrete. Arnold, 1970.

  32. Venuat M.Slag cements and their uses, Moniteur des Travaux Publics et du Bâtiment, Vol. 69, No. 53, 1972, pp. 65–70.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Smith M. A., Osborne G. J.Slag/fly ash cements. World Cement Technology, November/December 1977, pp. 223–233.

  34. Emery J. J.Steel slag applications in highway construction. Silicates Industrials, Issue 4–5, 1977, pp. 209–218.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sherwood P. T., Tubey L. W., Roe P. G.The use of waste and low grade materials in road construction: 7, miscellaneous wastes. TRRL Lab. Report 819.

  36. O'Riordan M. G., Duggan M. J., Rose W. B., Bradford G. F.National radiological protection board, Report, No. 7 London, HMSO, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Dickson J.Gypsum-building from the depths. Industrial Minerals, July 1978, pp. 17–32.

  38. Nurse R. W.—J. Applied Chemistry (London), Vol. 2, No. 12, 1952, pp. 708–716.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Gutt W.—Proc. 5th International Symp. Chemistry of Cement, Tokyo, 1968, Vol. 1, Tokyo, Cement Association of Japan, 1969, pp. 93–105.

  40. papers byDean K. C. andPincus A. G. in the Proc. of the First Min. Waste Util., Chicago, 1968.

  41. Tauber E, Hill R. K., Crook D. N., Murray M. J.Red mud residues from alumina production as a raw material for heavy clay products. J. Aust. Ceram. Soc., Vol. 7, No. 1, 1971, pp. 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Beretka J.The utilisation of industrial wates and by-products in the ceramic industry. J. Aust. Ceram. Soc., Vol. 11, No. 2, 1975, pp. 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Utilisation of red mud wastes for lightweight structural building products. II TRI Project, No. G6015, Final Report, 1968. Available from US Bureau of Mines, Washington DC 20240.

  44. Blank H. R.Red mud from alumina plants as a possible source of synthetic aggegate. J. of Testing and Evaluation, Vol. 4, No. 5, 1976, pp. 355–358.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  45. Takashi Mitsugi et al.Pilot test of manufacturing red mud aggregate. Kotsuzai Shigen (Aggregate resources), No. 20, 1974, pp. 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wargalla G.Einsatz von ratschlamm bei zement und blahtonherstellung. Erzmetall, Vol. 26, No. 1, 1973, pp. 18–20.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Kogai-Shigen-Ken.—Artificial lightweight aggregate from iron slag and red mud. National Research Institute for Pollution and Resources, News, March 1971.

  48. Japanese Patent 49-23221, 1th March 1974.

  49. Japanese Patent 49-60324, 12th June 1974.

  50. Katayama Shunzo, Horiguchi Yoschikazu.—Studies on the utilisation of red mud, Part 1, Supplement 1 Part 2-Part 5. Rikagaku Institute Research Report; Vol. 37, No. 2, 1961. pp. 101–105; Vol. 39, No. 5, 1963, pp. 224–225, pp. 407–410, Vol. 40, No. 1, 1964, pp. 62–65; Vol. 40, No. 2, 1964, pp. 111–114; Vol. 40, No. 3, 1964, pp. 194–200.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Lake, Fraser, Burns.—A laboratory investigation of the physical and chemical properties of spent oil shale. Roads and Road Construction, Vol. 44, No. 552, 1966, pp. 155–159.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Burns J.The use of waste and low grade materials in road construction: 6 Oil Shale. TRRL Lab. Report 818.

  53. Nevers T.D., Culbertson W. J., Hollingshead R.Disposal and uses of oil shale ash. Bureau of Mines Open File Report 32-74, 1970. Available from NTIS, No. PB 234-208.

  54. Gromko G. I.A preliminary investigation of the feasibility of spent oil shale as road construction material. Transportation Research Record, No. 549, 1975, pp. 47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  55. New uses for sulphur and pyrites. Industrial Minerals, December 1976, pp. 57–59.

  56. Shane G., Burgess R. A.The thermopave process. Shell Canada Ltd. Paper presented at the Sulphur Institute Symposium on New Uses for Sulphur, Madrid, 17–19th May 1976.

  57. New uses for sulphur,J. R. West, Ed. Advances in Chemistry, Series 140, Amer. Chem. Soc., Washington DC, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  58. David T. A., Hooks D. B.Utilisation of waste kiln dust from the cement industry. Proc. of the Fourth Min. Waste Util. Symp., Chicago, 1974, pp. 354–363.

  59. Coleman E. H.Concrete and constructional engineering, 1935.

  60. Tubey L. W.The use of waste and low-grade materials in road construction 5.China clay sand, TRRL Lab. Report 817, 1978.

  61. Tauber E., Hill R. K., Crook D. N., Murray M. J.—J. Aust. Ceramic Soc., Vol. 6, 1970, p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Several papers in the proceedings of the Five Min. Waste Util. Symp., Chicago, viz.:Nakamura H. H., Aleshin E., Schwartz M. A.Utilisation of copper, lead, zinc and iron ore taillings. Proc. of the Second Min. Waste Util. Symp., Chicago, 1970. pp. 139–148;Mindess S.Production of high pressure steam-cured calcium silicate building materials from mining industry waste products. Proc. of the First Min. Waste Util. Symp., Chicago, 1968, pp. 153‐154;Pettibone H. C.Engineering properties and utilisation examples of mine tailings. Proc. of the Min. Waste Util. Symp., Chicago, 1972, pp. 161–169;Mindess S., Richards C. W.Criteria for selection of mineral wastes for use in the manufacture of calcium silicate building materials. Proc. of the Second Min. Waste Util. Symp., Chicago, 1970, pp. 155–165;Collings R. K., Winer A. A., Feasby D. G., Zoldners N. G.Mineral waste utilisation studies. Proc. of the Fourth Min. Waste Util. Symp. Chicago, 1974, pp. 2–12;Stoops R. F., Redeker I. H.North Carolina Feldspar tailings utilisation. Proc. of the Second Min. Waste Util. Symp., Chicago 1970, pp. 177–180;Cutler I. B., Nicholson P. S.Ceramic products from mineral wastes. Proc. of the Second Min. Waste Util. Symp., Chicago, 1970, pp. 149–154.

  63. La Rosa P. J., Ricciardella K. A., McGarvey R. J.Carbonate bonding of Taconite tailings. Environmental Protection Technology Series Report No. EPA-670/2-74-001, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC 20460, January 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Heinz R. H., Geiger G. H.Utilisation of mine waste tailings in South Western Wisconsin. Grant. No. SWD-13, 1974. Available from US Bureau of mines, Washington DC 20240.

  65. Utilisation of mining and milling wastes. Illinois Institute of Technology Research Insitute Contract, No. H0190397, 1971. Available from US Bureau of Mines.

  66. Building bricks from the waste pile. Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 6, No. 6, 1972, pp. 502–503.

  67. Pettibone H. C., Kealy, C. D.Engineering properties of mine taillings. J. of the Soils Mechanics and Foundation Division (ASCE), 97, (SM9), 1971, pp. 1207–1225.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Watson K. L., Eden N. B., Farrant J. R.Autoclaved aerated materials made with slate powder and Portland cement. Precast Concrete, February 1977, pp. 81–85.

  69. Utilisation of phosphate slimes. Water Pollution Control Research Series, United States Environmental Protection Agency Report, No. 14050, EPU 09/71, 1971.

  70. Gutt W., Gaze M. E.Trinidad porcellanite as a pozzolan. Materials and Structures, Vol. 8, No. 48, pp. 439–450.

  71. Roe P. G.The use of waste and low-grade materials in road construction 4. Incinerated Refuse. TRRL Lab. Report 728, 1976.

  72. Pindzola D., Chou R. C.Synthetic aggregate from incinerator residue by a continuous fusion process. Federal Highway Administration Report FHWA-RD-74-23, 1974.

  73. Pindzola D.Large scale continuous production of fused aggregate from incinerator residue. Federal Highway Administration Report FHWA-RD-76-115, 1976.

  74. Haynes J., Ledbetter W. B.Incinerator residue in bituminous base construction. Federal Highway Adminstration Report, No. FHWA-RD-76-12, 1975.

  75. Lauer K. R., Leliaert R. M.Profitable utilisation of incinerator residue from municipal refuse. Proc. of the Fifth Min. Waste Util. Symp., Chicago, 1976, pp. 215–218.

  76. British Patent 1400854 (1975 pub.).

  77. Tauber E.Engobes and their use in the heavy clay industry. Aust. Mat. Clay, Vol. 6, 1965, p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Tauber E., Murray M. J.Glass-clay-mosaics and tiles. J. Aust. Ceram. Soc., Vol. 7, 1971, p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Tauber E., Murray M. J.Coloured exposed aggregates. Contr. Review, 41, 1968, p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Tauber E., Murray M. J.Low cost glass enamel composite makes attractive concrete decoration, Ceram. Ind., May 1969.

  81. Tauber E., Crook D. N.Bonding lightweight aggregates with glass. The Brit Clay Worker, Vol. 74, 1965, p. 42.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Shotts R. O.Waste glass as an ingredient of lightweight aggregate. Proc. of the Third Min. Waste Util. Symp., Chicago, 1972, pp. 411–422.

  83. Liles K. J., Tyrrell M. E.Waste glass as a raw material for lightweight aggregate. US Bureau of Mines Report of Investigation 8104, 1976. Available from NTIS, No. PB 250-692.

  84. Tyrrell M. E., Feld I. L.Structural products made from high silica fractions of municipal incinerator residues. Proc. of the Second Min. Waste Util. Symp., Chicago, 1970. pp. 355–362.

  85. Malisch W. R., Day D. E., Wixson B. G.Use of domestic waste glass for urban paving. Environmental Protection Agency Report, NO. EPA-670/2-73-038, 1973. Available from NTIS, No. PB222-052.

  86. Malisch W. P., Day D. E., Wixson B. G.Use of domestic waste glass as aggregate in bituminous concrete. Highway Research Record, No. 307, 1970, pp. 1–10.

  87. Malisch W. R., Day D. E., Wixson B. G.Use of waste glass for urban paving. Proc. of the Second Min. Waste Util. Symp., Chicago, 1970, pp. 369–373.

  88. Johnston C. D.Waste glass as coarse aggregate for concrete. J. of Testing and Evaluation, Vol. 2, No. 5, 1974, pp. 344–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Phillips J. C., Cahn D. S., Keller G. W.Refuse glass aggregate in Portland cement concrete. Proc. of the Third Min. Waste Util. Symp., Chicago, 1972, pp. 385–390.

  90. Wilson D. G., Foley P., Wiesman R.Demolition debris: qualities, composition and possibilities for recycling. Proc. of the Fifth Min. Waste Util. Symp., Chicago, 1976, pp. 8–15.

  91. Nixon P. J.The use of materials from demolition in construction. Resources Policy, December 1976, pp. 276–283.

  92. Buck A. D.Recycled concrete as a source of aggregate. Miscellaneous Paper C-76-2, Concrete Laboratory, US Army Engineer Waterways Experimental Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Newsletter, American Concrete Paving Association, Vol. 11, No. 10, October 1975.

  94. Saylak D, Gallaway B. M., Epps J. A.Recycling old asphalt concrete pavements. Proc. of the Fifth Min. Waste Util. Symp., Chicago, 1976, pp. 16–25.

  95. Proudy H., Hodge J., Gregory G.Recycled asphalt concrete. Federal Highway Administration Implementation Package 75-5, US Department of Transportation, 1975.

  96. New Civil Engineer, 26th January 1978, p. 18.

  97. Unpublished work at Building Research Establishment, UK.

  98. Kawam A., Smith L. M., Ross J., Larew H. G., Rude L.Feasibility of using sewage sludge in highway embankment construction. Federal Highway, Administration Report, FHWA-RD-75-38. Available from NTIS, No. PB 242-260.

  99. Gray D. H.Properties of compacted sewage ash. J. of the Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division (ASCE), 96, (SM2), 1970, pp. 439–451.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Milgrom J.The present state of recycling-thermoplastics and future trends. Solid Wastes, Vol. 65, No. 11, 1975, pp. 533–542.

    Google Scholar 

  101. BRE work (to be published).

  102. Rhoads D. C., Gordon R. B., Rimas Vaisnys J.Conversion of marine muds to lightweight construction aggregates. Envir. Sci. and Technol., Vol. 9, 1975, pp. 360–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Heller H. L., Thelen E.Bulding materials from dredge spoil. Franklin Institute Technical Report, No. F-C3069.

  104. British Patent 1409467, 8th October 1975.

  105. King N. J., Smith G. A.—Problems of wood waste. BRE Current Paper CP64/75, 1975.

  106. Young H. E.—Forest products J., Vol. 18, 1968, pp. 83–86.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gutt, W., Nixon, P.J. Use of waste materials in the construction industry. Matériaux et Constructions 12, 255–306 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02473543

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02473543

Keywords

Navigation