Skip to main content
Log in

Medical ethics and the two dogmas of liberalism

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two dogmas of liberalism in the therapeutic setting are challenged: (1) that patients have a ready-made ability to act autonomously; and (2) that non-intervention by physicians is the best strategy for protecting the autonomy of patients. Recognition of the impact of illness upon autonomous behavior forms the basis of this challenge. It is suggested that autonomy is better conceived as a process of personal growth by which patients become better able to overcome the disruptive effects of illness. The physician is assigned an active role in the achievement of this therapeutic goal. The implications of this new liberal theory are illustrated by reference to the informed consent issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Annas, G.: 1982, ‘The emerging stowaway: Patients' rights in the 1980s’, Law, Medicine and Health Care, February 1982, 32–35, 46.

  • Arrow, K.: 1974, ‘Government decision making and the preciousness of life’, in L. Trancedi (ed.), Ethics of Health Care, National Academy of Science, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T. and Childress, J.: 1980, Principles of Biomedical Ethics, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, H.: 1981, ‘Hope’, Journal of the American Medical Association 246, 1411–1412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassell, E.: 1976, The Healer's Art, Lippincott, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassell, E.: 1978, ‘What is the function of medicine?’, in E. McMullin (ed.), Death and Decision, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, pp. 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassileth, B. et al.: 1980, ‘Informed consent — Why are its goals imperfectly realized?’, The New England Journal of Medicine 302, 896–900.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousins, N.: 1980, ‘A layman looks at truthtelling’, Journal of the American Medical Association 244, 1929–1930.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt, Jr., H.T.: 1978, ‘Rights and responsibilities of patients and physicians’, in M. Bayles and D. High (eds.), Medical Treatment of the Dying: Moral Issues, Schenkman, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 9–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundner, T.: 1980, ‘On the readibility of surgical consent forms’, The New England Journal of Medicine 302, 900–902.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T.: 1909, Leviathan, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. and Youngner, S.: 1979, ‘Patient autonomy and “death with dignity”’, The New England Journal of Medicine 301, 404–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D.: 1981, ‘Interventions for acute stress’, in J. Spinetta and P. Spinetta (eds.), Living With Childhood Cancer, Mosby, St. Louis, pp. 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketchum, S. and Pierce, C.: 1981, ‘Rights and responsibilities’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 6, 271–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, J.: 1982, ‘The distinction between rights and responsibilities: A defense’, Linacre Quarterly 49, 121–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J.: 1946, The Second Treatise on Government, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisel, A. and Roth, L.: 1981, ‘What we do and do not know about informed consent’, Journal of the American Medical Association 246, 2473–2477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, G.: 1980, ‘How readable are subject consent forms’, Journal of the American Medical Association 244, 56–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muss, H. et al.: 1979, ‘Written informed consent in patients with breast cancer’, Cancer 43, 1549–1556.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research: 1978, The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priluck, I. et al.: 1979, ‘What patients recall of the preoperative discussion after retinal detachment surgery’, American Journal of Ophthalmology 87, 620–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, G. and Merav, A.: 1976, ‘Informed consent: Recall by patients tested post-operatively’, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 22, 209–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Eys, J.: 1978, ‘What do we mean by “the truly cured child”?’ in J. Van Eys (ed.), The Truly Cured Child: The New Challenge in Pediatric Cancer Care, University Park Press, Baltimore, pp. 81–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veatch, R.: 1976, Death, Dying and the Biological Revolution, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veatch, R.: 1981, A Theory of Medical Ethics, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ackerman, T.F. Medical ethics and the two dogmas of liberalism. Theor Med Bioeth 5, 69–81 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00489247

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00489247

Key words

Navigation