Skip to main content
Log in

Implications of statistical analysis of initial agroforestry experiments

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data from the tree components of fifteen agroforestry experiments were examined for patterns of variability, normality and correlation. Variances of data from intercropped plots were generally similar to those from monocropped plots and similar patterns for both types of plot were demonstrated over time. Non-normality of distributions were frequently indicated for both types of plot. Some examination was made of correlations between tree and crop components. Recommendations are made for suitable statistical analysis of such data and indications of experimental needs are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Box GEP (1953) Non-normality and tests of variances. Biometrika 40: 318–335

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bulmer MG (1979) Principles of Statistics. Dover Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cannell MGR, Njuguna CK, Ford ED and Smith R (1977) Variation in yield among competing individuals within mixed genotype stands of tea: a selection problem. Journal of Applied Ecology 14: 969–985

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gates DJ (1978) Bimodality in even-aged plant monocultures. Journal of Theoretical Biology 71: 525–540

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gates DJ (1982) Competition and skewness in plantations. Journal of Theoretical Biology 94: 909–922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mead R and Riley Janet (1981) A Review of Statistical Ideas Relevant to Intercropping Research. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 144: 462–509

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pearce SC (1976) Field Experimentation with Fruit Trees and Other Perennial Plants, T.C. 23, Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham Royal, England

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pearce SC and Gilliver B (1978) The statistical analysis of data from intercropping experiments. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 11: 625–632

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pearson ES (1965) Tables of percentage points of √b1 and b2 in normal samples; a rounding off. Biometrika 52: 282–285

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pearson ES & Hartley HO (1966) Biometrika Tables for Statisticians, volume 1, 3rd Edition. Cambridge University Press

  11. Rao CR (1965) Linear Statistical Inference and its Applications. New York, Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schreiner HG and Balloni EA (1976) Consórcio das culturas de feijao e eucalipto no Sudeste do Brasil. Boletin de Pequisa Florestal 12: 83–104

    Google Scholar 

  13. Siegel S (1956) Non-parametric Statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sokal RR and Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. 2nd Edition. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thomson AJ and Smith RB (1983) Growth patterns in a young western hemlock plantation infested with dwarf mistletoe. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 13: 972–978

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Langton, S.D., Riley, J. Implications of statistical analysis of initial agroforestry experiments. Agroforest Syst 9, 211–232 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00141085

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00141085

Key words

Navigation