Skip to main content
Log in

Indigenous agroforestry of Pohnpei

2. Spatial and successional vegetation patterns

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A vegetation survey of 54 randomly-selected Pohnpeian land holdings quantified agroforest vegetation patterns in terms of horizontal distribution in the landscape and changes over time. Spatial distribution of species, expressed as distance from the main household, varied greatly with successional stages to produce the characteristic pattern of the Pohnpeian agroforest. Food crops, bananas, and Piper methysticum were planted around the house compound first, then gradually planted further away over time. Upland forest and secondary successional trees were removed by girdling, and gradually replaced by annual and perennial crops and breadfruit and other trees. A fallow or reduced management stage was discerned, characterized by low densities of early successional crops and higher densities of weedy secondary successional species; this stage resulted from a reduction in management intensity, mainly due to a variety of socioeconomic factors. Although the indigenous Pohnpeian agroforestry system is permanent and thought to be sustainable, it is dynamic in space and time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Christanty, L, Abdoellah, OS, Marten, GG and Iskandar, J (1986) Traditional agroforestry in West Java: the pekarangan (homegarden) and kebun-talun (annual-perennial rotation) cropping systems. In: Marten, GG, ed, Traditional Agriculture in Southeast Asia: A Human Ecology Perspective, pp 132–158. Boulder and London, Westview Press

    Google Scholar 

  2. Haun A (1984) Prehistoric Subsistence, Population, and Socio-political Evolution on Ponape, Micronesia. PhD dissertation, University of Oregon, 311 pp

  3. Lebot, V and Cabalion, P (1988) Kavas of Vanuatu: Cultivars of Piper methysticum Forst. South Pacific Commission Technical Paper No. 195. Noumea, New Caledonia, 191 pp

    Google Scholar 

  4. MacLean, CD, Cole, TG, Whitesell, CD, Falanruw, MV and Ambacher, AH (1986) Vegetation Survey of Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia.USDA Forest Service, Resource Bulletin PSW-18. Berkeley, California. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, 9 pp, w/maps

    Google Scholar 

  5. Manner, H (1981) Ecological succession in new and old swiddens of montane Papua New Guinea. Human Ecology 9: 359–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Padoch, C and de Jong, W (1987) Traditional agroforestry practices of native and ribereno farmers in the lowland Peruvian Amazon. In: Gholz, HL, ed, Agroforestry: Realities, Possibilities, and Potentials, pp 179–194. Boston, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers (Kluwer Group)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Raynor WC and Fownes JH (1991) Indigenous agroforestry of Pohnpei. 1. Plant species and cultivars. Agroforestry Systems (this issue)

  8. Rocheleau, DE (1987) The user perspective and the agroforestry research and action agenda. In: Gholz, HL, ed, Agroforestry: Realities, Possibilities, and Potentials, pp 59–87. Boston, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers (Kluwer Group)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raynor, W.C., Fownes, J.H. Indigenous agroforestry of Pohnpei. Agroforest Syst 16, 159–165 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129746

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129746

Key words

Navigation