Abstract
In agroforestry projects careful planning and design of technologies is necessary because of the complex nature of agroforestry and the lack of proven technology ‘packages’. To identify appropriate methodologies, ICRAF conducted in 1988/89 a review of agroforestry technology monitoring and evaluation in 165 projects worldwide. Approximately half of the projects that responded to the review had carried out technology planning and design activities. The spectrum of information needs, which includes needs assessment, biophysical site description, agroforestry opportunities and existing information was inadequately covered by most projects. Statistically designed and questionnaire-based farmer surveys were favoured by projects although a range of more appropriate approaches and methods for technology planning and design exists. A planning approach is suggested that includes a pilot phase during which initial technology designs are developed and tested with farmers. Projects are encouraged to use more cost-effective, non-statistical methods. The authors recommend improvements to technology planning/design methods and identify training needs for project managers and extension staff.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abel NOJ, Drinkwater MJ, Ingram J, Okafor J and Prinsley RT (1989) Guidelines for training in rapid appraisal for agroforestry research and extension. East Anglia, UK: Commonwealth Science Council and Forestry Commission, Zimbabwe, 117 p
Abel NOJ and Prinsley RT eds (1988) Rapid appraisal for agroforestry research and extension. Proceedings and recommendations of a workshop, Gweru, Zimbabwe, 12–14 April 1988. London, UK: Commonwealth Science Council, 89 pp
Atta-Krah AN (1984) Fodder intervention in the farming system of southeastern Nigeria. Ibadan, Nigeria: ILCA, 10 pp
Buck L (1989a) Planning agroforestry projects: a case study from the CARE International in Kenya Agroforestry Extension Project. Paper presented at the Planning for Agroforestry Symposium, Washington State University, 24–27 April, Pullman, Washington
Buck L (1989b) Agroforestry Extension Training Sourcebook. New York: CARE International
Budd W and Hardesty L eds. Planning Agroforestry Projects. The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishing Company (in press)
Chambers R (1987) Shortcut methods in social information gathering for rural development projects. In: Proceedings of the 1985 International Conference on Rapid Rural Appraisal. Khon Kaen, Thailand: Rural Systems Research and Farming Systems Research Projects, pp 33–46
Chambers R, Pacey A and Thrupp LA (Eds) 1989. Farmer First: Farmer Innovation and Agricultural Research. London: Intermediate Technology Publications, 218 pp
Chavangi NA, Engelhard RJ and Jones V (1985) Culture as a basis for implementing self-sustaining development programmes. Nairobi, Kenya: KWDP, 25 pp
Collinson MP (1981) The explanatory survey: content, methods and detailed guidelines for discussions with farmers. In: CIMMYT Eastern Africa Economics Programme Farming Systems Newsletter. April–June. Nairobi, Kenya
Conway GR (1986) Agroecosystem Analysis for Research and Development. Bangkok, Thailand: Winrock International, 111 pp
Conway GR and McCracken JA (1987) Rapid rural appraisal and agroecosystem analysis. London: IIED, 35 pp
Duchart I, Steiner F and Bassman JH (1989) Planning methods for agroforestry. Agroforestry Systems 7: 227–258
FAO (1976) A framework for land evaluation. FAO Soil Bulletin 32. Rome: FAO, 72 pp
Fisher RJ (1988) Confusing numbers with facts: a note of caution about the results of quantitative survey questionnaires. Proceedings of the Second Meeting of the Working Group on Fodder Trees, Forest Fodder and Leaf Litter, 6–7 December, Kathmandu, Nepal, pp 16–18
Gibson DC and Müller EU (1987) Diagnostic survey and management information systems in agroforestry project implementation: a case study from Rwanda. Working Paper No. 49. Nairobi, Kenya: ICRAF, 81 pp
Hildebrand PE (1981) Combining disciplines in rapid appraisal: the Sondeo approach. Agricultural Administration 8: 423–432
Huxley PA, Rocheleau D and Wood PJ (1985) Farming systems and agroforestry research in northern Zambia: Phase I Report. Diagnosis of land use problems and research indications. Nairobi, Kenya: ICRAF
ICRAF (1983) Resources for agroforestry diagnosis and design: a handbook of useful tools and materials. Working paper No 7. Nairobi, Kenya: ICRAF, 383 pp
Kwesiga F and kamau IN eds (1988) Agroforestry potential in the unimodal upland plateau of Zambia. AFRENA Report No. 7. Nairobi, Kenya: ICRAF, 115 pp
Lagemann J and Heuveldop J (1982) Characterization and evaluation of agroforestry systems: the case of Acousta Puriscal, Costa Rica. Turrialba, Costa Rice: CATIE, 19 pp
Müller EU and Scherr SJ (1989) Technology monitoring and evaluation in agroforestry projects: an annotated bibliography. Nairobi, Kenya: ICRAF, 191 pp
Oberholzer E (1984) Characterization of the traditional agroforestry system in Palpa District: The study of Kokal and Gofek. Palpa, Nepal: Tinau Watershed Project, 43 pp
Raintree JB (1987a) D&D user's manual: an introduction to agroforestry diagnosis and design. Nairobi, Kenya: ICRAF, 110 pp
Raintree JB (1987b) The state of the art of agroforestry diagnosis and design. Agroforestry System 5(3): 219–250
Raintree JB and Torres F (1984) Agroforestry systems for smallholder upland farmers in a landreform area of the Philippines: the Tabango case study. Working Paper 18. Nairobi, Kenya: ICRAF
Rhoades RE (1982) The art of the informal agricultural survey. Training Document 1982–2. Lima, Peru: Social Science Department, International Potato Center
Rocheleau DE, Weber F and Field-Juma A (1988) Agroforestry in Dryland Africa. Nairobi, Kenya: ICRAF, 311 pp
Scherr SJ (1989) The ‘Diagnosis and Design’ approach to agroforestry project planning and implementation: examples from western Kenya. Paper presented at the Planning for Agroforestry Symposium, Washington State University, 24–27 April, Pullman, Washington
Scherr SJ Müller EU (1989) Technology monitoring and evaluation. What takes place in agroforestry research and extension projects? Agroforestry Today 1(4), pp 8–14
Scoones I (1988) Community management of Indigenous Woodland Project: Zvishavane and Chivi Districts. Harare, Zimbabwe: ENDA, 59 pp
Segleau J and Mora Fernandez F (1987) CATIE/DGF/GTZ Agroforestry Research Project in Talamanca: summary results of a survey with farmers in Talamanca. San José, Costa Rica: Dirección General Forestal (unpublished draft), 27 pp
Stummheit P, Topitach H and Hebeenzu S (1988) Evaluation of a soil conservation and agroforestry needs assessment study conducted in Mayabuka District of Zambia. Lusaka, Zambia: Department of Agriculture, 31 pp
Van Gelder B and Kerkhof P (1984) The agroforestry survey in Kakamega District: final report. Working Paper No. 6. Nairobi, Kenya: KWDP, 37 pp
Young A (1986) Land evaluation and agroforestry diagnosis and design: towards a reconcilation of procedures. Soil Survey and Land Evaluation 5: 61–76
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Müller, E.U., Scherr, S.J. Planning technical interventions in agroforestry projects. Agroforest Syst 11, 23–44 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122810
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122810