Skip to main content

Power, Relationship Commitment and Supplier Integration in Taiwan

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the Institute of Industrial Engineers Asian Conference 2013
  • 1539 Accesses

Abstract

This research extends power-relationship commitment theory to investigate the impact of power and relationship commitment on supplier integration from manufacturers’ perception toward their major suppliers in supply chain context in Taiwan. The power sources include expert power, referent power, legitimate power, reward power and coercive power, which can be categorized as non-mediated power and mediated power. Two types of the relationship commitment are studied, including normative relationship commitment and instrumental relationship commitment. The integration between manufacturers and suppliers (supplier integration) is measured by information integration and strategic integration. Based on a survey using data on 193 manufacturers in Taiwan, results indicate that coercive power has a positive influence on instrumental relationship commitment; however, reward power has no significant impact on any type of relationship commitment. Expert and referent power have positive impact on normative relationship commitment, while legitimate power has no significant influence on relationship commitment. Both normative and instrumental relationship commitment have positive impact on supplier integration and the former has a stronger influence than the latter. The findings can help companies enhance their supply chain integration by developing appropriate relationships with their suppliers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Boyer KK, Lewis MW (2002) Competitive priorities: investigating the need for trade-offs in operations strategy. Prod Oper Manage 11(1):9–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JR, Lusch RF, Nicholson CY (1995) Power and relationship commitment: their impact on marketing channel member performance. J Retail 71(4):363–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter JR, Narasimhan R (1996) Is purchasing really strategic? J Supply Chain Manage 32(1):20–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen IJ, Paulraj A (2004) Understanding supply chain management: critical research and a theoretical framework. Int J Prod Res 42(1):131–163

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Flint DJ, Larsson E, Gammelgaard B (2008) Exploring processes for customer value insights, supply chain learning and innovation: an international study. J Bus Logistics 29(1):257–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn BB, Flynn EJ (2004) An exploratory study of the nature of cumulative capabilities. J Oper Manage 22(5):439–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French RP, Raven BH (1959) The bases of social power. In: Cartwright D (ed) Studies in social power. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, pp 155–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Garver M, Mentzer JT (1999) Logistics research methods: employing structural equation modeling to test for construct validity. J Bus Logistics 20(1):33–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee HL (2004) The triple-a supply chain. Harvard Bus Rev 82(10):102–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloni M, Benton WC (2000) Power influences in the supply chain. J Bus Logistics 21(1):49–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Min S, Mentzer JT (2004) Developing and measuring supply chain management concepts. J Bus Logistics 25(1):63–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RM, Hunt SD (1994) The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. J Mark 58(3):20–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens GC (1989) Integrating the supply chain. Int J Phys Distrib Logistics Manage 19(8):3–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Huo B, Flynn BB, Yeung J (2008) The impact of power and relationship commitment on the integration between manufacturers and customers in a supply chain. J Oper Manage 26:368–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jen-Ying Shih .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Shih, JY., Lu, SJ. (2013). Power, Relationship Commitment and Supplier Integration in Taiwan. In: Lin, YK., Tsao, YC., Lin, SW. (eds) Proceedings of the Institute of Industrial Engineers Asian Conference 2013. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4451-98-7_111

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4451-98-7_111

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-4451-97-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-4451-98-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics