Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Islam and Assisted Reproduction in the Middle East: Comparing the Sunni Arab World, Shia Iran and Secular Turkey

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Changing World Religion Map

Abstract

This chapter examines the practice of assisted reproduction in the Muslim Middle East. Comparing the Sunni Arab World, Shia Iran and secular Turkey, we reveal both regional similarities and differences. We outline the global problem of infertility and the possibilities afforded by assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) to remedy them, before looking specifically at the ways in which Islam has responded to the novel ethical and social dilemmas generated by these technologies. The comparative analysis demonstrates that an expectation of a monolithic “Islamic approach” to ARTs is misguided and over-simplistic: while a fatwa banning all forms of third-party reproductive assistance (i.e. the use of donor sperm, donor eggs, donor embryos, and surrogacy) has been upheld in the Sunni Arab world since 1980, Shia clerics have been more permissive in their rulings, enabling the use of donation in Iranian fertility clinics. In Turkey, although donation is not practiced, the prohibitions are justified with reference to secular and bioethical principles rather than with reference to religion. We argue for a nuanced understanding of how religion requires interpretation in order to respond to contemporary challenges and emphasize the interrelationship between various local and global considerations at the nexus of medicine, commerce, law, and family-making in shaping ART practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baykal, B., Korkmaz, C., Ceyhan, S. T., Goktolga, U., & Baser, I. (2008). Opinions of infertile Turkish women on gamete donation and gestational surrogacy. Fertility and Sterility, 89, 817–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, M. (2006a). Islam, kinship and new reproductive technology. Anthropology Today, 22, 17–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, M. (2006b). Shiite perspectives on kinship and new reproductive technologies. ISIM Review, 17, 26–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, M. (2007). Closeness in the age of mechanical reproduction: Debating kinship and biomedicine in Lebanon and the Middle East. Anthropology Quarterly, 80, 379–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, M. (2008). New kinship, Islam, and the liberal tradition: Sexual morality and new reproductive technology in Lebanon. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 14, 143–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, M. (2009). Islam and new kinship: Reproductive technology, anthropology and the Shari’ah in Lebanon. New York: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garmaroudi Naef, S. (2012). Gestational surrogacy in Iran: Uterine kinship in Shia thought and practice. In M. C. Inhorn & S. Tremayne (Eds.), Islam and assisted reproductive technologies: Sunni and Shia perspectives (forthcoming). New York: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gürtin, Z. B. (2010). Problems with legislating against “reproductive tourism”. Commentary for BioNews, 550. London: Progress Educational Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gürtin, Z. B. (2011). Banning reproductive travel? Turkey’s ART legislation and third-party assisted reproduction. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 23, 555–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gürtin, Z. B. (2012). Assisted reproduction in secular Turkey: Regulation, rhetoric, and the role of religion. In M. C. Inhorn & S. Tremayne (Eds.), Islam and assisted reproductive technologies: Sunni and Shia perspectives (forthcoming). New York: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gürtin-Broadbent, Z. (2009). “Anything to become a mother:” Migrant Turkish women’s experiences of involuntary childlessness and Assisted Reproductive Technologies in London. In L. Culley, N. Hudson, & F. van Rooij (Eds.), Marginalised reproduction: Ethnicity infertility and reproductive technologies (pp. 117–134). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haeri, S. (1989). The law of desire: Temporary marriage in Iran. London: IB Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inhorn, M. C. (1994). Quest for conception: Gender, infertility, and Egyptian medical traditions. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inhorn, M. C. (2002). The “local” confronts the “global”: Infertile bodies and new reproductive technologies in Egypt. In M. C. Inhorn & F. van Balen (Eds.), Infertility around the globe: New thinking on childlessness, gender, and reproductive technologies (pp. 263–283). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inhorn, M. C. (2003a). Local babies, global science: Gender, religion, and in vitro fertilization in Egypt. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inhorn, M. C. (2003b). Global infertility and the globalization of new reproductive technologies: Illustrations from Egypt. Social Science and Medicine, 56, 1837–1851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inhorn, M. C. (2006a). Making Muslim babies: IVF and gamete donation in Sunni versus Shi’a Islam. Culture, Medicine & Psychiatry, 30, 427–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inhorn, M. C. (2006b). “He won’t be my son:” Middle Eastern Muslim men’s discourses of adoption and gamete donation. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 20, 94–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inhorn, M. C. (2006c). Fatwas and ARTS: IVF and gamete donation in Sunni v. Shi’a Islam. Journal of Gender, Race & Justice, 9, 291–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inhorn, M. C. (2006d). Islam, IVF, and everyday life in the Middle East: The making of Sunni versus Shi’ite test-tube babies. Anthropology of the Middle East, 1, 37–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inhorn, M. C. (2009). Globalization and reproductive tourism in the Muslim Middle East: IVF, Islam, and the Middle Eastern state. In C. H. Browner & C. F. Sargent (Eds.), Reproduction, globalization, and the state (pp. 126–138). Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inhorn, M. C. (2010). Assisted motherhood in global Dubai: Reproductive tourists and their helpers. In W. Chavkin & J. Maher (Eds.), The globalization of motherhood: Deconstructions and reconstructions of biology and care (pp. 180–202). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inhorn, M. C. (2011a). Male infertility and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in the Middle East. Middle East Institute Viewpoints: Public Health in the Middle East, 1, 26–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inhorn, M. C. (2011b). Globalization and gametes: Reproductive “tourism”, Islamic bioethics, and Middle Eastern modernity. Anthropology and Medicine, 18(1), 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inhorn, M. C. (2012). The new Arab man: Emergent masculinities, technologies, and Islam in the Middle East. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inhorn, M. C., & Birenbaum-Carmeli, D. (2008). Assisted reproductive technologies and culture change. Annual Review of Anthropology, 37, 177–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inhorn, M. C., & Fakih, M. H. (2006). Arab Americans, African Americans, and infertility: Barriers to reproduction and medical care. Special issue on “Health Disparities in Infertility”. Fertility and Sterility, 85(4), 844–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inhorn, M. C., & Tremayne, S. (Eds.). (2012). Islam and assisted reproductive technologies: Sunni and Shia perspectives. New York: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inhorn, M. C., & van Balen, F. (Eds.). (2002). Infertility around the globe: New thinking on childlessness, gender, and reproductive technologies. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inhorn, M. C., Patrizio, P., & Serour, G. I. (2010). Third-party reproductive assistance around the Mediterranean: Comparing Sunni Egypt, Catholic Italy and multisectarian Lebanon. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 21(7), 848–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isikoglu, M., Senol, Y., Berkkanoglu, M., Ozgur, K., Donmez, L., & Stones-Abbasi, A. (2006). Public opinion regarding oocyte donation in Turkey: First data from a secular population among the Islamic world. Human Reproduction, 21, 318–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, G. L., & Inhorn, M. C. (2003). Reproduction gone awry: Medical anthropological perspectives. Social Science and Medicine, 56, 1831–1836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, H. W., Cohen, J., Cooke, I., & Kempers, R. (2007). IFFS surveillance 07. Fertility and Sterility, 87(4), S1–S67, Supplement 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, S. M. (2000). Reproducing Jews: A cultural account of assisted conception in Israel. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khamenei, Haj Seyyed Ali. (1999). Ojoubeh al-Esteftaat (Questions No s. 1271 to 1277). Tehran; Nashre Amir Kabir.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilic, S., Ucar, M., Yaren, H., Gulec, M., Atac, A., Demirel, F., Karabulut, C., & Demirel, O. (2009). Determination of the attitudes of Turkish infertile women towards surrogacy and oocyte donation. Pakistan Journal of Medical Science, 25, 36–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoud, F. (2012). Controversies in Islamic evaluation of assisted reproductive technologies. In M. C. Inhorn & S. Tremayne (Eds.), Islam and assisted reproductive technologies: Sunni and Shia perspectives (forthcoming). New York: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meirow, D., & Schenker, J. G. (1997). The current status of sperm donation in assisted reproduction technology: Ethical and legal considerations. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 14, 133–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moosa, E. (2003). Human cloning in Muslim ethics. Voices Across Boundaries (Fall), 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenker, J. G. (2005). Assisted reproductive practice: Religious perspectives. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 3, 310–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serour, G. I. (1996). Bioethics in reproductive health: A Muslim’s perspective. Middle East Fertility Society Journal, 1, 30–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serour, G. I. (2008). Islamic perspectives in human reproduction. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 17(suppl. 3), 34–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serour, G. I., & Dickens, B. M. (2001). Assisted reproduction developments in the Islamic world. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 74, 187–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tappan, R. (2012). Moore than Fatwas: Ethical decision making in Iranian fertility clinics. In M. C. Inhorn & S. Tremayne (Eds.), Islam and assisted reproductive technologies: Sunni and Shia perspectives (forthcoming). New York: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremayne, S. (2009). Law, ethics and donor technologies in Shia Iran. In D. Birenbaum-Carmeli & M. C. Inhorn (Eds.), Assisting reproduction, testing genes; global encounters with new biotechnologies (pp. 144–164). New York: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremayne, S. (2012). The “down side” of third party donation: The “happy family rhetoric” in Iran. In M. C. Inhorn & S. Tremayne (Eds.) Islam and assisted reproductive technologies: Sunni and Shia Perspectives (forthcoming). New York: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vayena, E., Rowe, P. J., et al. (2002). Current practices and controversies in assisted reproduction: Report of a WHO meeting. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zegers-Hochschild, F., Adamson, G. D., de Mouzon, J., Isihara, O., Mansour, R., Nygren, K., Sullivan, E., van der Poel, S., on behalf of ICMART and WHO. (2009). The international Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) Revised Glossary on ART Terminology, 2009. Human Reproduction, 24(11), 2683–2687.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB223PQ, UK

    Zeynep B. Gürtin

  2. Anthropology and International Affairs, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA

    Marcia C. Inhorn

  3. Fertility and Reproduction Studies Group, Institute of Social and Cultural Anthropology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6PF, UK

    Soraya Tremayne

Authors
  1. Zeynep B. Gürtin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marcia C. Inhorn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Soraya Tremayne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zeynep B. Gürtin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA

    Stanley D. Brunn

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gürtin, Z.B., Inhorn, M.C., Tremayne, S. (2015). Islam and Assisted Reproduction in the Middle East: Comparing the Sunni Arab World, Shia Iran and Secular Turkey. In: Brunn, S. (eds) The Changing World Religion Map. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9376-6_165

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation