Abstract
This chapter looks at the rhetoric which surrounds the relationship of mathematics to the economic assumptions in modern societies. It is concerned on the one hand with the economic language which has invaded educational principles and on the other its converse, in which the language of mathematics is used to justify and authenticate political and economic arguments. Economic conditions are now globally managed — through inter-dependant markets, through overt political pressures from such bodies as the World Bank and through dominance and pressures from global corporations — and so too education is becoming an internationally uniformly conditioned commodity. The chapter also looks at the issues raised by international testing as measures of educational success and the supposed dominant variable in national economic success. After reviewing the dilemmas raised by ICT and new technologies in the context of disparate world resource divisions it also looks at the limited studies available on the impact of poverty on mathematics education in classrooms.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Reference
Apple, M. W. (2001a). Comparing neo-liberal projects and inequality in education. Comparative Education, 37(4), 409–423.
Apple, M. W. (2001b). Educating the ‘Right’ Way: Markets, Standards, God and Inequality. New York: Routledge.
Applebaum, P. (1995). Popular Culture, Educational Discourse, and Mathematics. Albany: Suny Press.
Barro, R. J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross-section of countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 407–443.
Barton, B. (1996). Making sense of ethnomathematics: Ethnomathematics is making sense. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31, 201–233.
Boaler, J. (1997). Setting social class and survival of the quickest. British Educational Research Journal, 23(5), 575–595.
Boaler, J., Wiliam, D., & Brown, M. (2000). Students experiences of ability grouping - disaffection, polarisation and the construction of failure. British Educational Research Journal, 26(5), 631–648.
Boaler, J., & Wiliam, D. (2001). “We’ve still got to learn!” Students perspectives on ability grouping and mathematics achievement. In P. Gates (Ed.), Issues in Mathematics Teaching (pp. 77–92). London: Routledge.
Borba, M., & Skovsmose, O. (1997). The ideology of certainty in mathematics education. For The Learning of Mathematics, 17(3), 17–23.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bracey, G. W. (2000). The TIMSS ‘final year’ study and report: A critique. Educational Researcher, 29(4), 4–10.
Brown, M. (1998). The tyranny of the international horse race. In R. Slee & G. Weiner with S. Tomlinson (Eds.), School Effectiveness for Whom? London: Falmer Press.
Chassapis, D. (1997). The social ideologies of school mathematics applications: A case study of elementary school textbooks. For The Learning of Mathematics, 27(3), 24–27.
Cooper, B., & Dunne, M. (1997). Social Class Differences in Children’s Difficulties with ‘Realistic’ Mathematics Testing. Buckingham, U.K.: Open University Press.
Damarin, S. K. (1996). The mathematics of popular consumption — a review of popular culture, educational discourse, and mathematics by P. Applebaum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(2), 21–243.
D’Ambrosio, U. (1997). Where does ethnomathematics stand nowadays? For the Learning of Mathematics, 17(2), 36–17.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1996). The right to learn and the advancement of teaching: Research, policy, and practice for democratic education. Educational Researcher, 25(6), 5–17.
Dench, S., Perryman, S., & Giles, L. (1998). Employers’ Perceptions of Key Skills. Brighton: Institute for Employment Studies Report 349.
Dubinsky, E., & Noss, R. (1996). Some kinds of computers for some kinds of learning: A reply to Koblitz. Mathematical Intelligencer, 18(1), 17–20.
Dunne, M. (1999). Positioned neutrality: Mathematics teachers and the cultural politics of their classrooms. Educational Review, 51(2), 117–128.
Evans, J., & Tstatsaroni, A. (2000). Mathematics and its publics: Texts, contexts and users. Social Epistemology, 24(1), 55–68.
Galbraith, P. L., & Haines, C. R. (2001). The key skills agenda: Exploring implications for mathematics. International Journal of Mathematics Education for Science and Technology, 32(3), 337–354.
Gerdes, P. (1996). Culture and mathematics education in (Southern) Africa. Proceedings of the 8th International Congress on Mathematical Education, Seville (pp. 221–232). Sevilla: S. A. E. M. Thailes
Gillborn, D. (1997). Racism and reform. British Educational Research Journal, 23, 345–360.
Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence. New York: Bantam.
Grenfell, M., & James, D. (1999). Bourdieu and Education: Acts of Practical Theory. London: Falmer Press.
Harlen, W., & Malcolm, H. (1999). Setting and Streaming: A Research Review. Edinburgh: Scottish Council for Research in Education.
Harris, S. (1998). Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Performance Assessment: Strengths and Weaknesses of Students in England. San Diego, CA: American Educational Research Association Conference.
ICME-8 (1996). Topic group 5: Education for mathematics in the workplace. In Proceedings of the 8th International Congress on Mathematical Education, Seville (pp. 259–265). Sevilla: S. A. E. M. Thailes
Jacobsen, E. (1996). International cooperation in mathematics education. In A. J. Bishop et al. (Eds.), International Handbook of Mathematics Education: Part Two (pp. 1235–1256). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Keitel, C., & Kilpatrick, J. (1999). The rationality and irrationality of international comparative studies. In G. Kaiser, E. Luna & I. Huntley (Eds.), International Comparisons in Mathematics Education (pp. 241–256). London: Falmer Press.
Koblitz, N. (1996). The case against computers in K-13 math education (Kindergarten through calculus). Mathematical Intelligencer, 18(1), 9–16.
Kuku, A. (1997). Science and technological literacy and numeracy. In E. W. Jenkins (Ed.), Innovations in Science and Technology Education (pp. 141–164). Paris: Unesco.
Lauder, H., & Hughes, D. (1999). Trading Places. Buckingham, U.K.: Open University Press.
Lubienski, S. T. (2000). A clash of social class cultures? Students’ experiences in a discussion-intensive seventh-grade mathematics classroom. Elementary School Journal, 100(4), 377–403.
Lubienski, S. T.. (2001). Class, ethnicity, culture and mathematical problem solving (one U.S. perspective) (Paper given at the American Educational Research Association). Seattle, April 2001. (ERIC ED460862).
Macnab, D. S. (2000). Raising standards in mathematics education: values, visions and TIMSS. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 40, 61–80.
Nebres, B. F. (1984). The problem of universal mathematics education in developing countries. In P. Damerow, M. E. Dunkley, B. F. Nebres & B. Werry (Eds.), Mathematics for All. Science and Technology Document Series No. 20 (pp. 18–21). Paris: UNESCO, Division of Science and Technical Environmental Education.
Noss, R., & Hoyles, C. (1996). The visibility of meanings: modelling the mathematics for banking. International Journal of Computers for Mathematics Learning, 1, 3–31.
Payne, K. J., & Biddle, B. J. (1999). Poor school funding, child poverty and mathematics achievement. Educational Researcher, 28(6), 4–33.
Rappaport, J. (1981). In praise of paradox: A social policy of empowerment over prevention. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9,1–25.
Ritzer G. (1993). The MacDonaldisation of the Society. London: Pine Forge Press.
Robinson, P. (1999). The tyranny of league tables. In R. Alexander, P. Broadfoot & D. Phillips (Eds.), Learning from Comparing (pp. 217–235). Oxford, Symposium Books.
Romberg, T. A. (1992). Further thoughts on the standards: A reaction to Apple. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 432–437.
Sammons, P. (1995). Gender, ethnic and socio-economic differences in attainment and progress: A longitudinal analysis of student achievement over 9 years. British Educational Research Journal, 21(4), 465–485.
Sawiran, M. (1995). Collaborative efforts in enhancing globalisation in mathematics education. In R. Hunting, G. FitzSimons, P. Clarkson & A. Bishop (Eds.), Regional Collaboration in Mathematics Education (pp. 603–609). Melbourne: Monash University.
Schmidt, W. H. et al. (1997). A Splintered Vision: An Investigation of US Mathematics and Science Teaching. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Skovsmose, O., & Nielsen, L. (1996). Critical mathematics education. In A. J. Bishop et al. (Eds.), International Handbook of Mathematics Education: Part Two. (pp. 1257–1288). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Sträßser, R. (1996). Mathematics for work — a didactical perspective. Proceeding of the 8th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 427–441). Sevilla: S. A. E. M. Thales.
Stronach, I. (1998). Education, vocationalism and economic recovery: The case against witchcraft. British Journal of Education and Work, 2(1), 5–31.
Stronach, I. (1999). Shouting theatre in a crowded fire: Education effectiveness as a cultural performance. Evaluation, 5(2), 173–193.
Stronach, I. (2001). Quantifying the qualitative as contemporary fool’s gold. (Manchester: British Society for Research in Learning Mathematics Conference, March) drawing on Stronach, I. (1999).
Tate, William F. (1997). Race-ethnicity, SESW, gender and language proficiency trends in mathemaics achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(6), 652–679.
Taylor, P. C. (1996). Mythmaking and mythbreaking in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31(1–2), 151–173.
TIMSS (US) (1998). Report Number 8. National Research Centre.
Vithal, R., & Skovmose, O. (1997). The end of innocence: A critique of’ethnomathematics’. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 34, 131–157.
Woodrow, D. (1997a). Social construction of theoretical beliefs. In D. Woodrow et al. Intercultural Education: Theories, Policies and Practices (pp. 29–54). Aldershot: Ashgate Press.
Woodrow, D. (1997b). Democratic education; does it exist and can it exist for mathematics education? For The Learning of Mathematics, 27(3), 11–16.
Woodrow, D. (2001). Cultural determination of curricula, theories and practices. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 9(1), 5–27.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Woodrow, D. (2003). Mathematics, Mathematics Education and Economic Conditions. In: Bishop, A.J., Clements, M.A., Keitel, C., Kilpatrick, J., Leung, F.K.S. (eds) Second International Handbook of Mathematics Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0273-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0273-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3951-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0273-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive