Abstract
Building a community of shared practice at the classroom level calls for clarity about the important assessment capabilities and dispositions of teachers, especially when teachers are expected to take a direct focus on learning. In this chapter, we present new ways of thinking about teachers’ assessment literacies, offering a formulation of better assessment for the improvement of learning, including three elements, namely (i) assessment criteria and standards; (ii) the teacher’s professional judgment; and (iii) social moderation. The potential of the first element lies in teachers’ classroom practices that deliberately embed assessment criteria and standards in pedagogy in productive ways. The second element involves the engagement of teachers and students in judgment practice, that develops the understanding that judgment involves more than the application of explicit or stated criteria. More fundamental is the matter of how teachers bring to bear stated features of quality and other intellectual and experiential resources in arriving at judgment. That is to say, they range across and orient to explicit (stated), tacit (unstated) and meta-criteria in judgment making. These insights have direct relevance to teachers’ efforts to develop students’ own evaluative experience, especially as this involves students working with stated features of quality for self-assessment and peer-assessment purposes. Further, practices for social moderation are discussed, giving examples of good practice in moderation, how teachers experience moderation and the potential benefits of various types.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adie, L. E., Klenowski, V., & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2011). Towards an understanding of teacher judgement in the context of social moderation. Educational Review, 64(2), 223–240.
Colbert, P., Wyatt-Smith, C., & Klenowski, V. (2012). A systems level approach to building sustainable assessment cultures: Moderation, quality task design and dependability of judgement. Policy Futures, 10(4), 387–402.
Cooksey, R., Freebody, P., & Wyatt-Smith, C. M. (2007). Assessment as judgment-in-context: Analysing how teachers evaluate students writing. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(5): 401–434.
Cumming, J. J., & Maxwell, G. S. (2004). Assessment in Australian schools: Current practice and trends. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11(1), 89–108.
Education Queensland. (2013). Social moderation and moderation protocols. <http://education.qld.gov.au/qcar/social-mod.html>. Accessed 15 April 2013.
Gipps, C. V. (1994). Beyond testing: Towards a theory of educational assessment. London: Falmer.
Klenowski, V. (2011). Assessment for learning in the accountability era: Queensland, Australia. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 78–83.
Klenowski, V. (2012). The Australian curriculum: Implications for teaching and assessment. Primary English Teaching Association Australia, 186, 1–8.
Klenowski, V., & Adie, L. E. (2009). Moderation as judgement practice: Reconciling system level accountability and local level practice. Curriculum Perspectives, 29(1), 10–28.
Klenowski, V., & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2010). Standards-driven reform years 1-10: Moderation an optional extra? Australian Educational Researcher, 37(2), 21–40.
Klenowski, V., & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2014). Assessment for education: Standards, judgement and moderation. London: Sage.
Maxwell, G. S. (2009). Defining standards for the 21st century. In C. Wyatt-Smith & J. J. Cumming (Eds.), Educational Assessment in the 21st Century: Connecting theory and practice (pp. 263–286). Dordrecht: Springer International.
OECD, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). Synergies for better learning: An international perspective on evaluation and assessment. Final synthesis report from the review. Released 11 April 2013. <http://www.oecd.org/education/school/oecdreviewonevaluationandassessmentframeworksforimprovingschooloutcomes.htm>. Accessed 17 April 2013.
O’Neill, O. (2013). Intelligent accountability in education. Oxford Review of Education, 39(1), 4–16.
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5, 77–85.
Smith, C. M. (1995). Teachers’ reading practices in the secondary school writing classroom: A reappraisal of the nature and function of pre-specified assessment criteria. Unpublished PhD thesis, The University of Queensland.
Stenhouse, L. (1975). An Introduction to curriculum research and development. Oxford: Heinemann.
Wyatt-Smith, C., & Castleton, G. (2005). Examining how teachers judge student writing: An Australian case study. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(2), 131–154.
Wyatt-Smith, C. M., & Bridges, S. (2007). Meeting in the middle: Assessment, pedagogy, learning and students at educational disadvantage. Final evaluation report for the department of education, science and training on literacy and numeracy in the middle years of schooling. <http://education.qld.gov.au/literacy/docs/deewr-myp-final-report.pdf>. Accessed 14 Sept 2012.
Wyatt-Smith, C., & Klenowski, V. (2013). Explicit, latent and meta-criteria: Types of criteria at play in professional judgement practice. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2012.725030. (online first)
Wyatt-Smith, C., Castleton, G., Cooksey, R., & Freebody, P. (2003a). Teachers’ qualitative judgements: A matter of context and salience. Part II. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 26(2), 33–42.
Wyatt-Smith, C., Castleton, G., Freebody, P., & Cooksey, R. (2003b). Teachers’ qualitative judgements: A matter of context and salience. Part I. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 26(2), 11–32.
Wyatt-Smith, C. M., Klenowski, V. and Gunn, S. (2010). The centrality of teachers’ judgment practice in assessment: A study of standards in moderation. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(1), 59–75.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wyatt-Smith, C., Klenowski, V. (2014). Elements of Better Assessment for the Improvement of Learning. In: Wyatt-Smith, C., Klenowski, V., Colbert, P. (eds) Designing Assessment for Quality Learning. The Enabling Power of Assessment, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5902-2_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5902-2_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5901-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5902-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)