Abstract
The purpose of this chapter is to shed light on the ontological assumptions that underlie the idea of a contract in Academic Capitalism. Far from being “simply a metaphor”, there are now concrete examples of real contracts in Swedish universities, which we here designate “academic contracts”. In investigating the perceived function of academic contracts, we will try to answer this fundamental question: For which problem, in what conception, is signing a contract between a student and an academic teacher a solution? By analysing four existing academic contracts from Swedish universities through the lens of a very influential economic theory of the nature and function of contracts, New Institutional Economics (NIE), we will argue that the implementation of academic contracts is totally at odds with the Humboldtian tradition and the classic university. Our contention is that the introduction of academic contracts does not facilitate, but rather undermines, the academic teaching and learning process.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
All translations from Swedish original into English are by the authors of this chapter.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
The “shirking” explanation of the firm in NIE is associated with Alchian & Demsetz (1972). In their view the firm arises when “/…/ it is difficult to restrict shirking through simple market exchange between contracting inputs” (1972: 783, emphasis added).
- 8.
Cf. “Transaction cost analysis /…/ is appropriate for studying the frictions in the system which may prevent the implications of received micro-theory from going through” (Williamson 1974: 1495).
- 9.
See Williamson (1985: 90): “/…/choice between firm and market thus turns entirely on governance cost difference”.
- 10.
A property right is defined as the right (a) to use, (b) to derive an income from and (c) to exchange an asset (Furubotn and Richter 1991: 6).
- 11.
“A theory of the state is essential because it is the state that specifies the property rights structure” (North 1981: 17).
References
Alchian, A. A., & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs, and economic organization. American Economic Review, 62, 777–795.
Almqvist, R. (2006). New public management – om konkurrenssättning, kontrakt och kontroll. Malmö: Liber.
Ankarloo, D. (2002). New institutional economics and economic history. Capital & Class, 78, 9–36.
Ankarloo, D., & Friberg, T. (2012). Den högre utbildningen – ett fält av marknad och politik. Möklinta: Gidlunds förlag.
Ankarloo, D., & Palermo, G. (2004). Anti-Williamson: A Marxian critique of new institutional economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 28, 413–429.
Barzel, Y. (1989). Economic analysis of property rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cheung, S. N. S. (1983). The contractual nature of the firm. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(1), 1–22.
Cheung, S. N. S. (1992). On the new institutional economics. In H. Wijkander & L. Werin (Eds.), Contract economics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Christensen, T., Lægreid, P., Roness, P. G., & Røvik, K. A. (2005). Organisationsteori för offentlig sektor. Malmö: Liber.
Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4, 386–405.
Dahlman, C. J. (1979). The problem of externality. Journal of Law and Economics, 22(1), 141–162.
Eggertsson, T. (1990). Economic behaviour and institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
European Commission, Educating & Training (2012). Strategic framework for education and training. http://ec.europa.eu/education/lifelong-learning-policy/doc28_en.htm. Accessed 10 Jan 2012.
Fine, B., & Milonakis, D. (2009). From economics imperialism to freakonomics. London/New York: Routledge.
Friberg, T. (2012). Akademiska subjekt och politisk-ekonomiska processer. In: Den högre utbildningen – ett fält av marknad och politik. Möklinta: Gidlunds förlag.
Furubotn, E. G., & Richter, R. (1991). The new institutional economics: An assessment. In E. G. Furubotn & R. Richter (Eds.), The New institutional economics. College Station: Texas A & M University Press.
Furubotn, E. G., & Richter, R. (1997). Institutions and economic theory: The contribution of the new institutional economics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Hasselbladh, H., Bejerot, E., & Gustafsson, R. Å. (2008). Bortom new public management: institutionell transformation i svensk sjukvård. Lund: Academia adacta.
Hodgson, G. M. (2004). Opportunism is not the only reason why firms exist: Why an explanatory emphasis on opportunism may mislead management strategy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(2), 401–418.
Högskoleverket. (2009:16R). Förkunskap och krav i högre utbildning. Stockholm: Högskoleverket.
Love, J. H. (2010). Opportunism, hold-up and the (contractual) theory of the firm. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 166(3), 479–501.
Malmö högskola. (2007). Studiehandledning omvårdnadshandledning inom sjuksköterskeprogrammet. www.mah.se/upload/_upload/studiehandledning%20omv.handl.%20070108.pdf. Accessed 3 Mar 2008.
Mirowski, P. (2011). Science-mart: Privatizing American science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
North, D. C. (1981). Structure and change in economic history. New York: Norton.
North, D. C. (1989). A transaction cost approach to the historical development of polities and economies. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 145, 661–668.
Rider, S. (2009). The future of the European university: Liberal democracy or authoritarian capitalism? Culture Unbound, 1, 83–104.
Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Stockholms universitet. (2003). Varför skriva uppsats?. Stockholm: Stockholms universitet, Institutionen för folkhälsovetenskap. http://courses.ki.se/utbildningsprogram/Folkhalsovetenskap/termin_4/FHVD01/filarkiv/uppsatskurs20p4.pdf. Accessed 3 Mar 2008.
Stockholms universitet. (2007). Examensarbete, PM för studenter i Teologiska programmet. Stockholm: Teologiska högskolan. http://www.ths.se/site/images/stories/Studentinformation/examensarbete_pm_for_studenter_.pdf. Accessed 3 Mar 2008.
Tsoukas, H. (1997). The tyranny of light: The temptations and the paradoxes of the information society. Futures, 29(9), 827–843.
Uppsala universitet. (2004). Examensarbete i datavetenskap vid Uppsala universitet: Utförande, redovisning och bedömning. Uppsala: Uppsala universitet, Institutionen för informationsteknologi. http://www.it.uu.se/edu/exjobb/csd-before-2004/exjobb-pm.shtml. Accessed 3 Mar 2008.
Williamson, O. E. (1974). The economics of anti-trust: Transaction cost considerations. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 126(6), 1439–1496.
Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ankarloo, D., Friberg, T. (2013). The Academic Contract: From “Simply a Metaphor” to Technology. In: Rider, S., Hasselberg, Y., Waluszewski, A. (eds) Transformations in Research, Higher Education and the Academic Market. Higher Education Dynamics, vol 39. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5249-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5249-8_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5248-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5249-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)