Skip to main content

Publish and Perish: A Note on a Collapsing Academic Authorship

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transformations in Research, Higher Education and the Academic Market

Part of the book series: Higher Education Dynamics ((HEDY,volume 39))

Abstract

This chapter argues that conscientious authorship is fundamental to academic culture. By going public in words, one demands recognition for the merits of one’s research and accepts being the legitimate target for justified criticisms. The writing of a scientific text is thus an intellectually and morally committing undertaking. However, there are signs to indicate that this traditional view of science is no longer self-evident. This present chapter expresses concern over the threat to intellectual standards that is represented by a growing acceptance of phenomena such as collective authorship, honorary or gift authorship, ghostwriting and commercially inspired subterfuge and deviousness, most spectacularly exemplified by phony authorships in the trials of new drugs. It is suggested that a widespread and complacent tolerance for a certain amount of phony authorship in every corner of the medical world contributes to making it tempting for the industry to put this kind of deviance into systematic use for commercial gain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Atterstam, I. (2008, April 20). Toppforskare säljer namnteckningar [Author’s translation: Top researchers sell signatures]. Svenska Dagbladet, 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeAngelis, C. D., & Fontanarosa, P. B. (2008). Impugning the integrity of medical science: The adverse effects of industry influence. JAMA, 299, 1833–1835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granit, R. (1948). The off/on-ratio of the isolated on-off-elements in the mammalian eye. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 32, 550–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, M. (2007). The demise of the lone author. Nature, 450, 1165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy, D., & Cattell, D. (2003). Interface between authorship, industry and science in the domain of therapeutics. British Journal of Psychiatry, 183, 22–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (1985). Guidelines on authorship. British Medical Journal, 291, 722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madiba, T. E., & Dhai, A. (2006). Addressing authorship disputes. South African Medical Journal, 96, 49–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauling, L., & Corey, R. B. (1951). The structure of fibrous proteins of the collagen-gelatin group. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 37, 272–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichelt, F. K., James, I. A., & Milne, D. L. (1998). Credit where credit’s due: Guidelines on authorship. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 26, 339–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. S., Hill, K. P., Egilman, D. S., & Krumholz, H. M. (2008). Guest authorship and ghostwriting in publications related to rofecoxib: A case study of industry documents from rofecoxib litigation. JAMA, 299, 1800–1812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacco, W. P., & Milana, S. (1984). Increase in number of authors per article in ten APA journals: 1960–1980. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 8, 77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schechter, A. N., Wyngaarden, J. B., Edsall, J. T., Maddox, J., Relman, A., Angell, M., & Stewart, W. W. (1989). Colloquium on scientific authorship: Rights and responsibilities. The FASEB Journal, 3, 209–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sismondo, S. (2009). Ghosts in the machine: Publication planning in the medical sciences. Social Studies of Science, 39, 171–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. (1994). Gift authorship: A poisoned chalice? British Medical Journal, 309, 1456–1457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, W. W., & Feder, N. (1987). The integrity of the scientific literature. Nature, 325, 207–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Inge-Bert Täljedal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Täljedal, IB. (2013). Publish and Perish: A Note on a Collapsing Academic Authorship. In: Rider, S., Hasselberg, Y., Waluszewski, A. (eds) Transformations in Research, Higher Education and the Academic Market. Higher Education Dynamics, vol 39. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5249-8_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics