Skip to main content

Race and Place: Determinants of Poverty in the Texas Borderland and the Lower Mississippi Delta

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Handbook of Rural Demography

Part of the book series: International Handbooks of Population ((IHOP,volume 3))

  • 2057 Accesses

Abstract

In the United States, poverty is place based. Nonmetro areas have substantially higher poverty rates than metro areas. Poverty is also regionally based: the two poorest regions in the United States are the Mississippi Delta and the Texas Borderland. Most counties in these two regions have poverty rates twice as high as the U.S. national average; many of those counties have been persistently poor (i.e., they have had poverty rates exceeding 20% for the past three decades); and over one half of the highest poverty counties are located in the Delta and the Borderland. Two key characteristics set the two regions apart: first, blacks make up the social minority in the Delta, whereas the social minority (which is often the demographic majority) in the Borderland are Latinos. And second, poverty in the Delta has existed in the context of substantial population losses, while poverty in the Borderland exists despite substantial population growth. Using multivariate statistics, we develop and test a model to analyze four sets of factors found previously to affect poverty: economic structure, demographic structure, human capital, and metro-nonmetro residence. We show that the correlates of poverty differ by ethnicity and race. Positive net migration which tends to be a proxy for economic development has not been a pathway out of poverty for Latinos. The employment rate of blacks and Latinos has a strong depressing effect on their rate of poverty, whereas no such effect exists for whites. Family structure matters far less for Latinos compared to blacks and whites; for the latter two population groups, single female-headed households have substantially increased poverty. In sum, the chapter demonstrates the importance of targeting poverty-intervention programs to specific demographic groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    European countries and the OECD use a relative measure of poverty rather than an absolute threshold level as in the United States.

  2. 2.

    For the remainder of this chapter the Texas Borderland will be referred to as the “Borderland” and the Lower Mississippi Delta will be referred to as the “Delta.”

  3. 3.

    The percent poor in Tables 20.1 and 20.2 (means) for the Delta and the Borderland are not fully comparable. The data in Table 20.1 are based on a weighted average of all Delta counties in order to match the procedure used for the national reporting of poverty rates, whereas the mean poverty in Table 20.2 is the unweighted average of all Delta county poverty rates.

  4. 4.

    When using geographically defined units of analysis, one must examine whether variables are independently distributed through space or if the value of a variable in one location is influenced by the value in a neighboring area (i.e., spatially autocorrelated). Our method for assessing possible autocorrelation involved the examination of Moran’s I statistic (queen 1st order contiguity). This statistic quantifies the degree to which the characteristics and spatial units are correlated with those of its neighbors. Our diagnostics showed that Moran’s I did not exceed ±0.2 (for conceptual and measurement issues regarding spatial autocorrelation, see Voss, White, & Hammer, 2006).

  5. 5.

    As a reminder, the independent variables for the race/ethnic-specific models are the respective values for each demographic group, as indicated in Table 20.3.

  6. 6.

    The importance of the correlates examined here is further demonstrated by an analysis of change in these factors that we carried out elsewhere (Fontenot et al., 2010).

References

  • Adelman, R. M., & Jaret, C. (1999). Poverty, race, and US metropolitan social and economic structure. Journal of Urban Affairs, 21(1), 35–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht, D. E., Albrecht, C. M., & Albrecht, S. L. (2000). Poverty in nonmetropolitan America: Impacts of industrial, employment, and family structure variables. Rural Sociology, 65, 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen-Smith, J. E., Wimberley, R. C., & Morris, L. V. (2000). America’s forgotten people and places: Ending the legacy of poverty in the rural south. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 32, 319–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betts, D. C., & Slottje, D. J. (1994). Crisis on the Rio Grande: Poverty, unemployment, and economic development on the Texas-Mexico border. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, D., & Wallace, M. (2001). Deindustrialization and poverty: Manufacturing decline and AFDC recipiency in lake country, Indiana 1964–93. Sociological Forum, 16, 321–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camarota, S. A. (1997). The effect of immigrants on the earnings of low-skilled native workers: Evidence from the June 1991 current population survey. Social Science Quarterly, 78(2), 417–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camarota, S. A. (2001). Immigrants in the United States – 2000. Spectrum: Journal of State Government, 74(2), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotter, D. A. (2002). Poor people in poor places: Local opportunity structures and household poverty. Rural Sociology, 67, 534–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cressie, N. A. (1993). Statistics for spatial data. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, M., Lichter, D. T., & Qian, Z. (2006). Beyond gateway cities: Economic restructuring and poverty among Mexican immigrant families and children. Family Relations, 55, 345–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davila, A., Bohara, A. K., & Saenz, R. (1993). Accent penalties and the earnings of Mexican Americans. Social Science Quarterly, 74(4), 902–916.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davila, A., & Mattila, J. P. (1985). Do workers earn less along the U.S.-Mexico border? Social Science Quarterly, 66, 310–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davila, A., & Mora, M. T. (2000). English skills, earnings, and the occupational sorting of Mexican Americans along the U.S.-Mexico border. International Migration Review, 34(1), 133–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, C. M. (1997). Worlds apart: Why poverty persists in Rural America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, C. M. (2001). Social capital in America’s poor rural communities. In S. Saegert, J. Thompson, & M. R. Warren (Eds.), Social capital and poor communities (pp. 60–86). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellwood, D., & Jencks, C. (2004). The spread of single-parent families in the United States since 1960. In D. Moynihan, T. Smeeding, & L. Rainwater (Eds.), The future of the family (pp. 25–65). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, W. W., & Rankin, B. H. (1992). The cost of being black in the black belt. Social Problems, 39, 299–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fong, L. Y.-S. (1998). Borderland poverty: The case of the Rio Grande valley at the United States-Mexican border. Social Development Issues, 20, 107–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontenot, K., Singelmann, J., Slack, T., Siordia, C., Poston, D. L., Jr., & Saenz, R. (2010). Understanding falling poverty in the poorest places: An examination of the experience of the Texas Borderland and Lower Mississippi Delta, 1990–2000. Journal of Poverty, 14, 216–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, W. H., & Liaw, K.-L. (2005). Migration within the United States: Role of race-ethnicity. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs, 6, 207–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, S., & Lichter, D. T. (1998). Spatial inequality and poverty among American children. Population Research and Policy Review, 17, 91–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasmeier, A. K. (2002). One nation, pulling apart: The basis of persistent poverty in the USA. Progress in Human Geography, 26, 155–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goe, W. R., & Rhea, A. (2000). The spatial shift in the growth of poverty among families headed by employed females, 1979–89. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 27, 79–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gundersen, C. (2006). Are the effects of the macroeconomy and social policies on poverty different in nonmetro areas in the United States? Rural Sociology, 71(4), 545–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattery, A., & Smith, E. (2007). Social stratification in the new/old South: The influence of racial segregation on social class in the Deep South. Journal of Poverty, 11, 81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschl, T., & Brown, D. L. (1995). The determinants of rural and urban poverty. In E. Castle (Ed.), The changing American countryside (pp. 229–246). Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, S., & Timberlake, M. (1993). The Mississippi Delta: Change or continued trouble. In T. A. Lyson, & W. W. Falk (Eds.), Forgotten places: Uneven development in rural America (pp. 78–101). Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, L., Findeis, J., Hsu, W.-L., & Schachter, J. P. (1999). Slipping into and out of underemployment: Another disadvantage for nonmetropolitan workers? Rural Sociology, 64, 417–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, L., McLaughlin, D. K., & Slack, T. (2003). Rural poverty: The persisting challenge. In D. L. Brown, & L. E. Swanson (Eds.), Challenges for rural America in the twenty-first century (pp. 118–131). University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, L., & Tienda, M. (1989). Nonmetropolitan minority families in the United States: Trends in racial and ethnic economic stratification, 1959–1986. Rural Sociology, 54, 509–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kodras, J. E. (1997). The changing map of American poverty in an era of economic restructuring and political realignment. Economic Geography, 73, 67–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. A., & Singelmann, J. (2006). Welfare reform amidst chronic poverty in the Mississippi Delta. In W. A. Kandel, & D. L. Brown (Eds.), Rural population change and rural society (pp. 381–403). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lemann, N. (1991). Promised land: The great migration and how it changed America. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levernier, W., Patridge, M. D., & Rickman, D. S. (2000). The causes of regional variations in US poverty: A cross-county analysis. Journal of Regional Science, 40(3), 473–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichter, D. T., Graefe, D. R., & Brown, J. B. (2003). Is marriage a Panacea? Union formation among economically disadvantaged unwed mothers. Social Problems, 50, 60–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichter, D. T., & McLaughlin, D. K. (1995). Changing economic opportunities, family structure, and poverty in rural areas. Rural Sociology, 60, 688–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobao, L. M. (1990). Locality and inequality: Farm and industry structure and socioeconomic conditions. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobao, L. M., & Saenz, R. (2002). Spatial inequality and diversity as an emerging research area. Rural Sociology, 67, 497–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyson, T. A., & Falk, W. W. (Eds.). (1993). Forgotten places: Uneven development in rural America. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maril, R. L. (1989). Poorest of Americans: The Mexican-Americans of the lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1993). American Apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S., & Eggers, M. L. (1990). The ecology of inequality: Minorities and the concentration of poverty, 1970–1980. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1153–1188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Advisory Committee on Rural Poverty. (1967). The people left behind: A report. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nord, M. (1998). Poor people on the move: County-to-county migration and the spatial concentration of poverty. Journal of Regional Science, 38(2), 329–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2008). Growing unequal? Income distribution and poverty in OECD countries. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hare, W. P. (1988). The rise of poverty in rural America. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parisi, D., Grice, S. M., Taquino, M., & Gill, D. A. (2005). Community concentration of poverty and its consequences on nonmetro county persistence of poverty in Mississippi. Sociological Spectrum, 25, 469–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parisi, D., McLaughlin, D. K., Grice, S. M., Taquino, M., & Gill, D. A. (2003). TANF participation rates: Do community conditions matter? Rural Sociology, 68, 491–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rank, M. R., & Hirschl, T. A. (1988). A rural-urban comparison of welfare exits: The importance of population density. Rural Sociology, 53, 28–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rankin, B. H., & Falk, W. W. (1991). Race, region, and earnings: Blacks and whites in the South. Rural Sociology, 56, 224–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, J. E., Reynolds, L., & Deluca, S. (2002). How do places matter? The geography of opportunity, self-efficacy and a look inside the black box of residential mobility. Housing Studies, 17, 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupasingha, A., & Goetz, S. A. (2007). Social and political forces as determinants of poverty: A spatial analysis. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 36, 650–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rural Sociological Society Task Force on Persistent Rural Poverty. (1993). Persistent poverty in rural America. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saenz, R. (1997a). Ethnic concentration and Chicano poverty: A comparative approach. Social Science Research, 26, 205–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saenz, R. (1997b). Mexican American poverty in Texas border communities: A multivariate approach. Unpublished manuscript presented at the Borderlands Landscapes Conference, Texas A&M International University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saenz, R., & Ballejos, M. (1993). Industrial development and persistent poverty in the lower Rio Grande Valley. In T. A. Lyson, & W. W. Falk (Eds.), Forgotten places: Uneven development in rural America (pp. 102–123). Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saenz, R., & Thomas, J. K. (1991). Minority poverty in nonmetro Texas. Rural Sociology, 56, 204–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, W. (1997). Regionally specific strategies to alleviate rural poverty. Economic Development Review, 15, 52–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singelmann, J. (1978). From agriculture to services: The transformation of industrial employment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singelmann, J. (2001). Louisiana welfare survey wave III: Selected results. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University, Department of Sociology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singelmann, J., Davidson, T., & Reynolds, R. (2002). Welfare, work, and well-being in metro and nonmetro Louisiana. Southern Rural Sociology, 18, 21–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slack, T. (2010). Working poverty across the metro-nonmetro divide: A quarter century in perspective, 1979–2003. Rural Sociology, 75, 363–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slack, T., & Jensen, L. (2002). Race, ethnicity, and underemployment in nonmetropolitan America: A 30-year profile. Rural Sociology, 67, 208–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slack, T., Singelmann, J., Fontenot, K., Poston, D. L., Jr., Saenz, R., & Siordia, C. (2009). Poverty in the Texas Borderland and Lower Mississippi Delta: A comparative analysis of differences by family type. Demographic Research, 20, 353–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snipp, C. M. (1996). Understanding race and ethnicity in rural America. Rural Sociology, 61, 125–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, A. R., McLaughlin, D. K., & Findeis, J. (2006). Household composition and poverty among female-headed households with children: Differences by race and residence. Rural Sociology, 71(4), 597–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, L. E., Harris, R. P., Skees, J. R., & Williamson, L. (1994). African Americans in southern rural regions: The importance of legacy. The Review of Black Political Economy, 22, 109–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, P. P., & Ryan, E. (2001). Homeless Hispanic and Non-Hispanic adults on the Texas-Mexico border. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Science, 23, 239–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Texas Secretary of State. (2009). Colonias FAQ’s. Retrieved September 12, 2009, from http://www.sos.state.tx.us/border/colonias/faqs.shtml.

  • Tickamyer, A. R., & Duncan, C. M. (1990). Poverty and opportunity structure in rural America. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 67–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2002). Census 2000 Summary file 3. Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2011). Historical poverty tables – People. Tables 2 and 8. Retrieved March 6, 2011, from http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/data/historical/people.html

  • Voss, P. R., Long, D. D., Hammer, R. B., & Friedman, S. (2006). County-child poverty rates in the U.S.: A spatial regression approach. Population Research and Policy Review, 25, 369–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voss, P. R., White, K. C., & Hammer, R. B. (2006). Explorations in spatial demography. In W. Kandel & D. L. Brown (Eds.), Population change and rural society: Demographic research for a new century (pp. 407–429). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, D. H. (1987). Rural pockets of poverty. Rural Sociology, 52, 398–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimberley, R. C., & Morris, L. V. (2002). The regionalization of poverty: Assistance for the Black Belt South? Southern Rural Sociology, 18, 294–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoskowitz, D. W., Giermanski, J. R., & Pena-Sanchez, R. (2002). The influence of NAFTA on socio-economic variables for the US-Mexico border region. Regional Studies, 36, 25–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This is a revised version of a paper presented at the XXVI IUSSP International Population Conference in Marrakech, Morocco, September–October 2009. This project was supported by the National Research Initiative (NRI) of the Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Service (CSREES), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Rural Development Program, Grant #2006-35401-17432. Dudley L. Poston, Jr., and Rogelio Saenz from Texas A&M University were part of the grant and provided very helpful comments. We thank Huizhen Niu of the Agricultural Economics Geographic Information Systems (AEGIS) Lab. in the Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, LSU AgCenter, for her assistance in developing the maps presented in this paper and used to diagnose spatial effects.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joachim Singelmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Singelmann, J., Slack, T., Fontenot, K. (2012). Race and Place: Determinants of Poverty in the Texas Borderland and the Lower Mississippi Delta. In: Kulcsár, L., Curtis, K. (eds) International Handbook of Rural Demography. International Handbooks of Population, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1842-5_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics