Skip to main content

The Role of Nature in Children’s Resilience: Cognitive and Social Processes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Greening in the Red Zone

Abstract

This chapter examines the convergence of two literatures: one addressing human resilience, the other focused on the natural environment and human well-being. Research evidence suggests that views of and access to nearby nature serve as protective factors, bolstering the resilience of youth. However little effort has been made to explicitly integrate resilience or positive psychology with nature and well-being research and theory. First, a brief historical overview of childhood resilience literature is presented with a focus on the evolution from protective factors to protective mechanisms. Second, the chapter presents research connecting nature to positive outcomes, particularly in the context of stress, adversity, and other risk factors. Third, we consider two particularly viable, well-grounded mechanisms linking nature to resilience: social relationships and cognitive functioning. Lastly, directions for future research are presented. Further examination of the intersection of resilience and the natural environment holds promise for theory as well as practice, and has the potential to substantially influence the lives of children facing the challenges of life in a red zone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    ‘Rails’ refers to railroad tracks.

  2. 2.

    Moderators, also known as ‘interaction variables’ or ‘effect modifiers’ address issues of when, for whom, it depends, or under what circumstances. For example, being raised in an abusive household may have less detrimental effects for children who have a positive relationship with an adult outside of the home (the protective factor) than for children who do not have such a relationship. In other words, the effect of an abusive household on child outcomes varies according to (or depends upon) positive adult relationship outside the home (the moderator). Mediators, in contrast, concern explanatory mechanisms or causal pathways linking variables. Mediators address questions of how or why. For example, why does access to nature enhance cognitive functioning?—by reducing directed attention fatigue. In this case, directed attention fatigue mediates the relation between nature and cognitive functioning. See Baron and Kenny (1986) and Wells et al. (2007).

References

  • Anthony, E. J. (1974). The syndrome of the psychologically invulnerable child. In E. J. Anthony & C. Koupernik (Eds.), The child in his family: Children at psychiatric risk (Vol. 3, pp. 3–10). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, H., & Tsourou, C. (2000). Health urban planning: A WHO guide to planning for people. London/Copenhagen: Spon/WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, M. G., Jonides, J., et al. (2008). The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1207–1212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berto, R. (2005). Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(3), 249–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cimprich, B., & Ronis, D. L. (2003). An environmental intervention to restore attention in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Cancer Nursing, 26(4), 284–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coley, R. L., Kuo, F. E., et al. (1997). Where does community grow? The social context created by nature in urban public housing. Environment and Behavior, 29(4), 468–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faber Taylor, A., & Kuo, F. E. (2009). Children with attention deficits concentrate better after walk in the park. Journal of Attention Disorders, 12, 402–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faber Taylor, A., Wiley, A., et al. (1998). Growing up in the inner city: Green spaces as places to grow. Environment and Behavior, 30(1), 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faber Taylor, A., Kuo, F. E., et al. (2001). Coping with ADD: The surprising connection to green play settings. Environment and Behavior, 33(1), 54–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faber Taylor, A., Kuo, F. E., et al. (2002). Views of nature and self-discipline: Evidence from inner city children. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22(1–2), 49–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frumkin, H. (2001). Beyond toxicity: The greening of environmental health. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 20(3), 234–240.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garmezy, N. (1974). The study of competence in children at risk for severe psychopathology. In E. J. Anthony & C. Koupernik (Eds.), The child in his family: Children at psychiatric risk III. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell, M. (2008). Outliers: The story of success. New York: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartig, T., Mang, M., et al. (1991). Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environment and Behavior, 23, 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1892). Psychology: The briefer course. New York: Henry Holt.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (1983). Cognition and environment: Functioning in an uncertain world. Ann Arbor: Ulrich’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotlowitz, A. (1992). There are no children here. New York: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, F. E. (2001). Coping with poverty: Impacts of environment and attention in the inner city. Environment and Behavior, 33(1), 5–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, F. E., & Faber Taylor, A. (2004). A potential natural treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Evidence from a national study. American Journal of Public Health, 94(9), 1580–1586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, F. E., Sullivan, W. C., et al. (1998). Fertile ground for community: Inner-city neighborhood common spaces. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26(6), 823–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kweon, B., Sullivan, W. C., et al. (1998). Green common spaces and the social integration of inner-city older adults. Environment and Behavior, 30, 832–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louv, R. (2005). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Chapel Hill: Algoquin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luthar, S. S. (2006). Resilience in development: A synthesis of research across five decades. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Risk, disorder, and adaptation (Vol. 3). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luthar, S. S., & Cicchetti, D. (2000). The construct of resilience: Implications for interventions and social policies. Development and Psychopathology, 12, 857–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. The American Psychologist, 56(3), 227–238.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Masten, A. S., & Coatsworth, J. D. (1998). The development of competence in favorable and unfavorable environments lessons from research on successful children. The American Psychologist, 53(2), 205–220.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, L. B., & Moriarty, A. (1976). Vulnerability, coping, and growth: From infancy to adolescence. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ober, J. A., Alaimo, K., et al. (2008). Growing vegetables and values: Benefits of neighborhood-based community gardens for youth development and nutrition. Journal of Hunger and Environmental Nutrition, 3(4), 418–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, P. E. (1988). Natural landscapes, gathering places, and prospect refuges: Characteristics of outdoor places valued by teens. Children’s Environments Quarterly, 5(2), 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozer, E. J. (2006). The effects of school gardens on students and schools: Conceptualization and considerations for maximizing healthy development. Health Education & Behavior, 34(6), 846–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, R., Tassinary, L. G., et al. (1998). The view from the road: Implications for stress recovery and immunization. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18(2), 113–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1998). Successful aging: The MacArthur foundation study. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M. (1979). Protective factors in children’s responses to stress and disadvantage. In M. Kent & J. Rolf (Eds.), Primary prevention in psychopathology: Social competence in children (pp. 49–74). Hanover: University Press of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M. (1987). Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 57, 316–331.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, K. M., & King, L. (2000). Why positive psychology is necessary. The American Psychologist, 56(3), 216–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, S., O’Fallon, L. R., et al. (2003). Creating healthy communities, healthy homes, healthy people: Initiating a research agenda on the built environment and public health. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 1446–1450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokols, D. (1992). Establishing and maintaining healthy environments: Toward a social ecology of health promotion. The American Psychologist, 47(1), 6–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, W. C., Kuo, F. E., et al. (2004). The fruit of urban nature: Vital neighborhood spaces. Environment and Behavior, 36(5), 678–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svendsen, E. S. (2009). Cultivating resilience: Urban stewardship as a means to improving health and well-being. In L. Campbell & A. Wiesen (Eds.), Restorative commons: Creating health and well-being through urban landscapes (pp. 59–87). Newtown Square: USDA Forest Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., Repetti, R. L., et al. (1997). Health psychology: What is an unhealthy environment and how does it get under the skin? Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 411–447.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tennessen, C. M., & Cimprich, B. (1995). Views to nature: Effects on attention. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 77–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, R. S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224(4647), 420–421.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., et al. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(3), 201–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, N. (2000). At home with nature: Effects of “greenness” on children’s cognitive functioning. Environment and Behavior, 32(6), 775–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, N. M., & Donofrio, G. A. (2011). Urban planning, the natural environment, and public health. In J.O. Nriagu (Ed.), Encyclopedia of environmental health. Amsterdam/London: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, N. M., & Evans, G. W. (2003). Nature as a buffer: Life stress among rural children. Environment and Behavior, 35(3), 311–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, N. M., Ashdown, S. P., et al. (2007). Environment, design and obesity: Opportunities for interdisciplinary collaborative research. Environment and Behavior, 39(1), 6–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, N. M., Evans, G. W., et al. (2010). Environment and health: Planning decisions as public health decisions. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 27(2), 124–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E., & Smith, R. (1982). Vulnerable but invincible: A study of resilient children. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (1946). Constitution of World Health Organization, from http://www.opbw.org/int_inst/health_docs/WHO-CONSTITUTION.pdf

  • Zautra, A. J. (2009). Resilience: One part recovery, two parts sustainability. Journal of Personality, 77(6), 1935–1943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nancy M. Wells .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wells, N.M. (2014). The Role of Nature in Children’s Resilience: Cognitive and Social Processes. In: Tidball, K., Krasny, M. (eds) Greening in the Red Zone. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9947-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics