Skip to main content

Social Entrepreneurship in Urban Planning and Development in Montreal

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Contradictions of Neoliberal Planning

Part of the book series: GeoJournal Library ((GEJL,volume 102))

Abstract

Urban development projects, or targeted spatial interventions driven by property logics and aiming at delivering social and economic benefits, became increasingly popular as a spatial planning device in the push for the creation of more competitive urban environments. This chapter shows how the transformation of a large-scale industrial complex in Montreal (Angus Technopolis), a special form of urban project, gave rise to a new distribution of roles and responsibilities between community organisations, union-related organisations, private business and public actors. It is argued that tensions arise between the expansion of the urban neoliberal agenda (through stimulation of a more entrepreneurial civil society); and the potential for new forms of collective action. The analysis of the emergence of a ‘not-for-profit developer’ in the Angus case suggests the potential for social entrepreneurship, incorporating broad socio-economic objectives in the delivery of urban spatial policy. However, it is also shows the emergence of new constraints and the risk of instrumentalisation of community-based organisations when civil society groups take the entrepreneurial turn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.Montrealinternational.com/bulletin/2009/T1/index_en.html, consulted 11/11/2009. Montréal International is referred to in the literature as the instrument of the new neoliberal Québec Inc. Its mission is to: ‘contribute to the economic development of Metropolitan Montréal and increase the region’s international status’; its vision: ‘Montréal International seeks to position the Montréal Metropolitan Community among North American leaders with respect to wealth per inhabitant’; its mandates are to: ‘Attract foreign investment, increase the presence of international organisations; facilitate the relocation of strategic foreign workers; support the development of innovation; accelerate the development of strategic clusters’.

  2. 2.

    http://www.catalethique.org/en/site-visit/details/31Technop%C3%B4le%20Angus, consulted 12/12/2009.

References

  • Albrechts, L. (2001). From traditional land use planning to strategic spatial planning: The case of Flanders. In L. Albrechts, J. Alden, & A. Da Rosa Pires (Eds.), The changing institutional landscape of planning (pp. 83–108). Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrechts, L. (2006). Bridge the gap: From spatial planning to strategic projects. European Planning Studies, 14(10), 1487–1500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amin, A. (2005). Local community on trial. Economy and Society, 34(4), 612–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amin, A., Cameron, A., & Hudson, R. (2002). Placing the social economy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau, J. A., Hamel, P., Jouve, B., & Keil, R. (2006). Comparing metropolitan governance: The cases of Montreal and Toronto. Progress in Planning, 66(1), 7–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (2004). New state spaces. Urban governance and the rescaling of statehood. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defilippis, J. (2004). Unmaking goliath. Community control in the face of global capital. New York; London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2008). Social enterprise in Europe: Recent trends and developments. Social Enterprise Journal, 4(3), 202–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz Orueta, F., & Fainstein, S. (2008). The new mega-projects: Genesis and impacts. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(4), 759–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eugène, B. (2008). Villes et résistances sociales. Bruxelles: Atheles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontan, J. M., Hamel, P., Morin, R., & Shragge, E. (2003). The institutionalisation of Montreal's CDECS: From grassroots organisations to state apparatus? Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 12(1), 58–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1989). The end of history? The National Interest, 16(Summer), 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goonewardena, K. (2003). The future of planning at the ‘end of history’. Planning Theory, 2(3), 183–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graefe, P. (2007). Social economy policies as flanking mechanisms for neoliberalism: Trans-national policy solutions, emergent contradictions, local alternatives. In S. Lee & S. McBride (Eds.), Neoliberalism, state power and global governance. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6220-9_6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gualini, E. (2006). The rescaling of governance in Europe: New spatial and institutional rationales. European Planning Studies, 14(7), 881–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hager, S. (2006). ‘New Europeans’ for the ‘new European economy’: Citizenship discourses and the Lisbon Agenda. Masters Thesis. Sweden: Linköpings Universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, P., & Jouve, B. (2006). Un modèle québécois? Gouvernance et participation dans la gestion publique. Montreal: La presse de l'Universite de Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1989). From managerialism to entrepreneurialsim: The transformation of urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography, 71(1), 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning-shaping places in fragmented societies. Planning-environment-cities. Houndmills-Basingstoke-Hampshire-London: MacMillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, R. (2005). Rethinking change in old industrial regions: Reflecting on the experiences of North East England. Environment and Planning A, 37, 581–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingallina, P. (2001). Le projet urbain. Paris: Press Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2002). Liberalism, neoliberalism and urban governance: A state-theoretical perspective. Antipode, 34, 452–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Journal de Rosement. (1994). CP cède la moitié du site Angus à la CDEC. Journal de Rosement, 48(21), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. L., Fontan, J. M., & Tremblay, D. G. (2008). Local development as social innovation: The case of Montreal. In P. Drewe, J. L. Klein, & E. Hulsbergen (Eds.), The challenge of social innovation in urban revitalisation (pp. 103–116). Amsterdam: Design/Science/Planning Techne Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. L., & Tremblay, D. G. (2009). Social actors and their role in metropolitan governance in Montréal: Towards an inclusive coalition? GeoJournal, 75(6), 567–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laville, J. L. (2005). Action publique et economie: un cadre d'analyse. In J. L. Laville, J. P. Magnen, G. C. de França Filho, & A. de Medeiros (Eds.), Action publique et économie solidaire. Ramonville: Eres.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, U., & Laidley, J. (2008). Old mega-projects newly packaged? Waterfront redevelopment in Toronto. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(4), 786–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipietz, A. (2001). Pour le tiers secteur: l'economie sociale et solidaire: pourqoui et comment. Paris: La Découverte/ La Documentation Francaise.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, M. (2000). Social movements in European cities: Transitions from the 1970s to the 1990s. In A. Bagnasco & P. Le Gales (Eds.), Cities in contemporary Europe (pp. 131–152). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mendell, M. (2002). The social economy in Québec. Discourse and strategies. Critical political studies: Debates and dialogues for the left (pp. 468–502). Montreal: McGill-Queen’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendell, M. (2006). The social economy in Quebec. In Balta meeting 2006. Alberta

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendell, M., & Neamtan, N. (2005). The social economy in Quebec. Constructing a new paradigm. http://www.havenscenter.org/audio/marguerite_mendell_and_nancy_neamtan_social_economy_quebec_constructing_new_paradigm. Accessed March 8, 2009.

  • Moulaert, F., & Ailenei, O. (2005). Social economy, third sector and solidarity relations: A conceptual synthesis from history to present. Urban Studies, 42(11), 2037–2054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moulaert, F., Swyngedouw, E., & Rodriguez, A. (2003). The globalised city. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan, G., & Landry, C. (1995). The other invisible hand. Remaking charity for the 21st century. London: DEMOS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, D. (2004). World cities as hegemonic projects: The politics of global imagineering in Montreal. Political Geography, 23(5), 571–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (2002). Neoliberalizing space. Antipode, 34(2), 380–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (2000). Community, citizenship, and the third way. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(9), 1395–1411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SDA. (2007). Technopole Angus. 10 Ans et déjà bien bati! Rapport annuel 2006-2007. Montreal: SDA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufts, S. (1998). Community Unionism in Canada and Labor’s (Re) Organization of Space. Antipode, 30(3), 227–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara van Dyck .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van Dyck, B. (2012). Social Entrepreneurship in Urban Planning and Development in Montreal. In: Tasan-Kok, T., Baeten, G. (eds) Contradictions of Neoliberal Planning. GeoJournal Library, vol 102. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8924-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics