Abstract
Local ecological knowledge has been subject to a great deal of debate in recent decades. Early strands of this literature could be easily classified into two camps – one which purports the adaptive logic and scientific validity of local knowledge, and the other which seeks to expose its flaws by illustrating its divergence from scientific understandings. While acknowledging subsequent attempts to question this dichotomy (Agrawal (Development and Change 26:413–439, 1995); Long (Development Sociology: Actor Perspectives. London and New York: Routledge, 2001); Pottier et al. (Negotiating Local Knowledge: Power and Identity in Development. London: Pluto Press, 2003)), this chapter maintains the distinction as a means of exploring claims to validity of diverse bodies of knowledge. It does this through a series of case studies on biophysical processes that have been subject to much debate and misunderstanding in both public and scientific spheres. Local and scientific knowledge are juxtaposed in two ways. By highlighting biophysical processes for which local and scientific understandings diverge but for which local ecological knowledge is nevertheless functionally sound, the adaptive capacity of local knowledge is illustrated. As is shown, empirical foundations to local ecological knoweldge may be found even behind purportedly “erroneous” perceptions of cause and effect. Secondly, by exposing the subjectivities of scientific understandings on certain biophysical processes, the grounding of even the most “objective” knowledge in perceptual and political biases is illustrated. Case studies on shifting agriculture, watershed function, and ecological processes that challenge our predictive capacities help to illustrate both the scientific foundations of local knowledge and the “perceptual” foundations of science. The intention is neither to discredit scientific understandings nor to place undue emphasis on the merits of local ways of knowing, but rather to expose the unfair value judgements leveraged against the latter historically – and to call for a more even playing field in the politics of environmental knowledge.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Epistemology is the theory of knowledge, especially with regard to methods, validity and scope. It is the investigation of what distinguishes justified belief from opinion.
- 3.
“Constructivism” is a theory of knowledge which argues that humans generate knowledge and meaning from their experience interacting with each other and with the environment they live in. Constructivist theories of psychology view learning as an active process of (re)construction rather than as a transmission of existing knowledge. “Social constructivism” extends constructivism into social settings, with a major focus on uncovering the ways in which individuals and groups collaborate in creating their perceived social reality.
- 4.
Ecosystem resilience is the capacity of an ecosystem to tolerate disturbance without collapsing into a qualitatively different state (www.resalliance.org).
- 5.
This might be called “epistemological subjugation,” or the forced submission of one’s foundations of knowledge (including its nature, validity and scope) to control by others.
- 6.
Smokey the Bear is a cartoon figure utilized to mobilize the public against forest and wildfires in the United States.
- 7.
- 8.
Of human origin.
- 9.
From replacement of indigenous trees and competition with undergrowth on communal lands.
- 10.
- 11.
As opposed to always reflecting some “objective”, material reality.
References
Agrawal, A. (1995). Dismantling the divide between indigenous and scientific knowledge. Development and Change, 26, 413–439.
Archibald, S., Bond, W. J., Stock, W. D., & Fairbanks, D. H. K. (2005). Shaping the landscape: Fire-grazer interactions in an African Savanna. Ecological Applications, 15(1), 96–109.
Atran, S. (1990). The cognitive foundations of natural history: Towards an anthropology of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Batterbury, S., Forsyth, T., & Thomson, K. (1997). Environmental transformations in developing countries: Hybrid research and democratic policy. Geographical Journal, 163(2), 126–132.
Berkes, F. (1999). Sacred ecology: Traditional ecological knowledge and management systems. London: Taylor and Francis.
Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2002). Navigating social–ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Berlin, B. (1992). Ethnobiological classification: Principles of categorization of plants and animals in traditional societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Blaikie, P., & Brookfield, H. C. (Eds.). (1987). Land degradation and society. London: Methuen.
Bollig, M., & Schulte, A. (1999). Environmental change and pastoral perceptions: Degradation and indigenous knowledge on two African pastoral communities. Human Ecology, 27(3), 493–514.
Brokensha, D. W., Warren, D. M., & Werner, O. (1980). Indigenous knowledge systems and development (p. 473). Washington, DC: University Press of America.
Bruijnzeel, L. A. (2004). Hydrological functions of tropical forests: Not seeing the soil for the trees? Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 104, 185–228.
Bryant, R. L. (1994). Shifting the cultivator: The politics of teak regeneration in colonial Burma. Modern Asian Studies, 28, 225–250.
Calder, I. R., Rosier, P. T. W., Prasanna, K. T., & Parameswarappa, S. (1997). Eucalyptus water use greater than rainfall input: A possible explanation from Southern India. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 1, 246–256.
Carrere, R., & Lohmann, L. (1996). Pulping the south: Industrial tree plantations and the world paper economy. London: Zed Books.
Casson, A. (1997). The controversy surrounding eucalypts in social forestry programs of Asia. Resource Management in Asia-Pacific Working Paper No. 3. Canberra: Research School for Pacific and Asian Studies, The Australian National University.
Chambers, R., Pacey, R., & Thrupp, L. (Eds.). (1989). Farmer first: Farmer innovation and agricultural research. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.
Checkland, P. (1991). From framework through experience to learning: The essential nature of action research. In H. Nissen, H. Klein, & R. Hirscheim (Eds.), Information systems research: Contemporary approaches and emergent traditions (pp. 397–403). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Checkland, P., & Holwell, S. (1998). Action research: Its nature and validity. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 11(1), 9–21.
Christensen, N. L., Agee, J. K., Brussard, P. F., Hughes, J., Knight, D. H., Minshall, G. W., et al. (1989). Interpreting the Yellowstone fires of 1988. BioScience, 39(10), 678–685.
Clements, F. E. (1936). The nature and structure of climax. The Journal of Ecology, 24(1), 252–284.
Colfer, C. J. P. (2005). The complex forest: Communities, uncertainty, and adaptive collaborative management (p. 370). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future and CIFOR.
Conklin, H. C. (1954). The ethnoecological approach to shifting agriculture. Transactions of the New York Academy of Science, 17, 133–142.
Conklin, H. C. (1957). Hanunoo agriculture: A report on an integral system of shifting cultivation in the Philippines. Rome: FAO.
Conway, G. (1999). The Doubly Green Revolution: Food for all in the twenty-first century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Cruz, M. E., & Rivera, R. (1983). Cambios Ecológicos y de Poblamiento en el Sector Forestal Chileno. Santiago: GIA.
DeBano, L. F., Neary, D. G., & Ffolliot, P. F. (1998). Fire’s effects on ecosystems. New York: Wiley.
Denevan, W. M., & Padoch, C. (Eds.). (1987). Swidden-fallow agroforestry in the Peruvian Amazon, advances in economic botany (Vol. 5). New York: New York Botanical Garden.
DeWalt, B. (1994). Using indigenous knowledge to improve agriculture and natural resource management. Human Organization, 53(22), 123–131.
Dove, M. (1983). Theories of swidden agriculture and the political economy of ignorance. Agroforestry Systems, 1, 85–99.
Dove, M. (1993a). A revisionist view of tropical deforestation and development. Environmental Conservation, 20(1), 17–25.
Dove, M. (1993b). Uncertainty, humility and adaptation in the tropical forest: The agricultural augury of the Kantu. Ethnology, 32, 145–167.
Dove, M. (1996). Process versus product in Bornean Augury: A traditional knowledge system’s solution to the problem of knowing. In R. Ellen & K. Fukui (Eds.), Redefining nature: Ecology, culture and domestication (pp. 557–597). Oxford/Washington, DC: Berg.
Dove, M. R., & Kammen, D. M. (1997). The epistemology of sustainable resource use: Managing forest products, swiddens and high-yielding variety crops. Human Organization, 56(1), 91–101.
Ellen, R. (1993). The cultural relations of classification: An analysis of Nuaulu animal categories from Central Seram. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fairhead, J., & Leach, M. (1996). Misreading the African landscape. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Farley, K. A., Jobbagy, E. G., & Jackson, R. B. (2005). Effects of afforestation on water yield: A global synthesis with implications for policy. Global Change Biology, 11, 1565–1576.
Folke, C., Colding, J., & Berkes, F. (2002). Synthesis: Building resilience for adaptive capacity in social–ecological systems. In F. Berkes, J. Colding, & C. Folke (Eds.), Navigating social–ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change (pp. 352–387). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fosnot, C. T. (1996). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives and practice (p. 228). New York: Teachers College Press.
Gardner, A. (2005). The new calculus of Bedouin pastoralism in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. In S. Paulson & L. Gezon (Eds.), Political ecology across spaces, scales, and social groups (pp. 76–93). London: Rutgers University Press.
German, L. (2001). The dynamics of Terra Preta: An integrated study of human-environmental interaction in a nutrient-poor Amazonian ecosystem. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Georgia, 313 pp.
German, L. (2003). Ethnoscientific understandings of Amazonian Dark Earths. In J. Lehmann, D. C. Kern, B. Glaser, & W. I. Woods (Eds.), Amazonian Dark Earths: Origins, properties, management (pp. 179–201). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
German, L. (2004). Ecological praxis and blackwater ecosystems: A case study from the Brazilian Amazon. Human Ecology, 32(6), 653–683.
German, L. (2006). Moving beyond component research in mountain regions: Operationalizing systems integration at farm and landscape scale. Journal of Mountain Science, 3(4), 287–304.
German, L., Charamila, S., & Tesema, T. (in press). Managing trade-offs in agroforestry: From conflict to collaboration in natural resource management. In S. Klappa & D. Russell (Eds.), Transformations in agroforestry systems. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
German, L., Kidane, B., & Shemdoe, R. (2006). Social and environmental trade-offs in tree species selection: A methodology for identifying niche incompatibilities in agroforestry. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 8, 535–552.
German, L., Tolera, T., Alemu, G., & Shemdoe, R. (2004). The role of traditional ecological knowledge, beliefs and practices in NRM: A case study from the Eastern African Highlands. Paper given at the 9th International Congress of Ethnobiology. Kent, 13–17 June.
Glaser, B., & Woods, W. I. (2004). Amazonian Dark Earths: Explorations in space and time. Heidelberg: Springer.
Golley, F. B. (1996). A history of the ecosystem concept in ecology: More than the sum of the parts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Gordon, L. J., Peterson, G. D., & Bennett, E. M. (2007). Agricultural modifications of hydrological flows create ecological surprises. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 23(4), 211–219.
Grove, R. (1997). Green imperialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gunderson, L. H., & Holling, C. S. (Eds.). (2002). Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Hagmann, J., & Chuma, E. (2002). Enhancing the adaptive capacity of the resource users in natural resource management. Agricultural Systems, 73(1), 23–39.
Hart, S. C., DeLuca, T. H., Newman, G. S., MacKenzie, M. D., & Boyle, S. I. (2005). Post-fire vegetative dynamics as drivers of microbial community structure and function in forest soils. Forest Ecology and Management, 220, 166–184.
Hecht, S. B. (2003). Indigenous soil management and the creation of Amazonian Dark Earths: Implications of Kayapó practices. In J. Lehmann, D. C. Kern, B. Glaser, & W. I. Woods (Eds.), Amazonian Dark Earths: Origins, properties, management (pp. 355–372). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Holling, C. S. (2001). Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological and social systems. Ecosystems, 4, 390–405.
Holling, C. S., & Meffe, G. K. (1996). Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conservation Biology, 10, 328–337.
Kato, M. S. A., Kato, O. R., Denich, M., & Vlek, P. L. G. (1999). Fire-free alternatives to slash-and-burn for shifting cultivation in the eastern Amazon region: The role of fertilizers. Field Crops Research, 62(2), 225–237.
Knorr-Cetina, K. D. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Knorr-Cetina, K. D., & Mulkay, M. (1983). Science observed: Perspectives on the social study of science. London: Sage.
Knox, K. J. E., & Clarke, P. J. (2005). Nutrient availability induces contrasting allocation and starch formation in resprouting and obligate seeding shrubs. Functional Ecology, 19(4), 690–698.
Kramp, B. A., Patton, D. R., & Brady, W. W. (1986). Run wild: Wildlife–habitat relationships. Albuquerque, NM: U.S. Forest Service, Southwestern Region.
Kull, C. A. (2004). Isle of fire: The political ecology of landscape burning in Madagascar. Chicago, IL/London: The University of Chicago Press.
Latour, B. (1990). Postmodern? No, simply amodern! Steps towards an anthropology of science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 21(1), 145–171.
Lebel, L., Anderies, J. M., Campbell, B., Folke, C., Hatfield-Dodds, S., Hughes, T. P., et al. (2006). Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 11(1), 19.
Lehmann, J., Kern, D. C., Glaser, B., & Woods, W. I. (2003). Amazonian Dark Earths: Origins, properties, management. Dordrecht, The Nethelands: Kluwer.
Leigh, J. H., & Noble, J. C. (1981). The role of fire in the management of rangelands in Australia. In A. M. Gill, R. H. Groves, & I. R. Noble (Eds.), Fire and the Australian biota (pp. 471–496). Canberra: Australian Academy of Science.
Li, C. (2000). Population differences in water-use efficiency of Eucalyptus microtheca seedlings under different watering regimes. Physiologia Plantarum, 108(2), 134–139.
Long, N. (2001). Development sociology: Actor perspectives. London/New York: Routledge.
Lowood, H. E. (1990). The calculating forester: Quantification, cameral science, and the emergence of scientific forestry management in Germany. In T. Frängsmyr, J. L. Heilbron, & R. E. Rider (Eds.), The quantifying spirit in the eighteenth century (pp. 315–342). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Markakis, J. (2004). Pastoralism on the margin (p. 37). London: Minority Rights Group International.
McCullough, D. G., Werner, R. A., & Neumann, D. (1998). Fire and insects in northern and boreal forest ecosystems of North America. Annual Review of Entomology, 43, 107–127.
Minnich, R. A. (1983). Fire mosaics in southern California and northern Baja California. Science, 219, 1287–1294.
Morgan, G., & Ramirez, R. (1983). Action learning: A holographic metaphor for guiding social change. Human Relations, 37(1), 1–28.
Norgaard, R. B. (2004). Learning and knowing collectively. Ecological Economics, 49(2), 231–241.
Nye, P. H., & Greenland, D. J. (1960). The soil under shifting cultivation. Farnham: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.
Odum, E. (1953). Fundamentals of ecology. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders.
Ortiz, S. (1979). Expectations and forecasts in the face of uncertainty. Man, 14(1), 64–80.
Pfund, J. -L. (2000). Culture sur brûlis et gestion des ressources naturelles. Evolution et perspectives de trois terroirs ruraux du versant Est de Madagascar, Thesis. Zurich: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), and Lausanne, Switzerland: École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne.
Posey, D. A. (1985). Indigenous management of tropical forest ecosystems: The case of the Kayapó Indians of the Brazilian Amazon. Agroforestry Systems, 3(2), 139–158.
Pottier, J., Bicker, A., & Sillitoe, P. (2003). Negotiating local knowledge: Power and identity in development. London: Pluto.
Pyne, S. J. (1984). Introduction to wildland fire: Fire management in the United States. New York: Wiley.
Pyne, S. J. (1997a). Vestal fire: An environmental history, told through fire, of Europe and Europe’s encounter with the world. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Pyne, S. J. (1997b). World fire: The culture of fire on earth. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Raintree, J. B. (1996). The Great Eucalyptus Debate: What is it really all about? RAP Publication No. 1996/44. Bankok: FAO.
Resilience Alliance (2009). Resilience. Available at: http://www.resalliance.org/576.php. Accessed 2 Mar 2009.
Richards, P. W. (1952). The tropical rain forest. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, P. (1980). Community environmental knowledge in African rural development. In D. Brokensha, D. Warren, & O. Werner (Eds.), Indigenous knowledge systems and development (pp. 183–195). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Roe, E. (1991). Development narratives, or making the best of blueprint development. World Development, 19(4), 287–300.
Röling, N. G. (1996). Towards an interactive agricultural science. European Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 2(4), 35–48.
Rumley, R., & Ong, C. (2006). The right tree for a dry place. Tree water use synthesis 1. Nairobi: ICRAF.
Sakai, A. K., Allendorf, F. W., Holt, J. S., Lodge, D. M., Molofsky, J., With, K. A., et al. (2001). The population biology of invasive species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 32, 305–332.
Sanchez, P. A., Bandy, D. E., Villachica, J. H., & Nicholaides, J. J. (1982). Amazon Basin soils: Management for continuous crop production. Science, 216, 821–827.
Savage, M., & Mast, J. N. (2005). How resilient are southwestern ponderosa pine forests after crown fires? Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 35, 967–977.
Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S., Foley, J. A., Folke, C., & Walker, B. (2001). Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature, 413, 591–596.
Scott, J. C. (1990). Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Scott, J. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Scott, D. F. (1999). Managing riparian zone vegetation to sustain streamflow: Results of paired catchment experiments in South Africa. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research, 29(7), 1149–1157.
Scott, D. F., & Lesch, W. (1997). (1997) Streamflow responses to afforestation with Eucalyptus grandis and Pinus patulu and to felling in the Mokobulaan experimental catchments, South Africa. Journal of Hydrology, 199, 360–377.
Scott, D. F., & Smith, R. E. (1997). Preliminary empirical models to predict reductions in total and low flows resulting from afforestation. Water South Africa, 23(2), 135–140.
Shiva, V., & Bandyopadhyay, J. (1987). Ecological audit of eucalyptus cultivation. Dehra Dun: Research Foundation for Science and Ecology.
Sillitoe, P. (1988). Knowing the land: Soil and land resource evaluation and indigenous knowledge. Soil Use and Management, 14, 188–193.
Sinclair, F. L., & Walker, D. H. (1999). A utilitarian approach to the incorporation of local knowledge in agroforestry research and extension. In L. E. Buck, J. P. Lassoie, & E. C. M. Fernandes (Eds.), Agroforestry in sustainable agricultural systems (pp. 245–275). Boca Raton, FL: CRC.
Sivaramakrishnan, K. (1996). The politics of fire and forest regeneration in colonial Bengal. Environment and History, 2(2), 145–194.
Stape, J. L., Binkley, D., Ryan, M. G., & do Nascimento Gomes, A. (2004). Water use, water limitation and water use efficiency in a Eucalyptus plantation. Bosque, 25(2), 35–41.
Swallow, B. M., & Bromley, D. W. (1995). Institutions, governance and incentives in common property regimes for African rangelands. Environmental and Resource Economics, 6(2), 99–118.
Tinker, P. B., Ingram, J. S. I., & Struwe, S. (1996). Effects of slash-and-burn agriculture and deforestation on climate change. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 58(1), 13–22.
Tomich, T. P., van Noordwijk, M., Vosti, S. A., & Witcover, J. (1998). Agricultural development with rainforest conservation: Methods for seeking best bet alternatives to slash-and-burn, with applications to Brazil and Indonesia. Agricultural Economics, 19(1–2), 159–174.
Trouiller, P., Torreele, E., Olliaro, P., White, N., Foster, S., Wirth, D., et al. (2001). Drugs for neglected diseases: A failure of the market and a public health failure? Tropical Medicine and International Health, 6(11), 945–951.
Uhl, C. (1987). Factors controlling succession following slash-and-burn agriculture in Amazonia. The Journal of Ecology, 75(2), 377–407.
van den Brink, R., Bromley, D. W., & Chavas, J. P. (1995). The economics of Cain and Abel: Agro-pastoral property rights in the Sahel. Journal of Development Studies, 31(3), 373–399.
van Noordwijk, M., Poulsen, J. G., & Ericksen, P. J. (2004). Quantifying off-site effects of land use change: Filters, flows and fallacies. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 104(1), 19–34.
Walker, B. H., Anderies, J. M., Kinzig, A. P., & Ryan, P. (2006). Exploring resilience in social–ecological systems through comparative studies and theory development: Introduction to the special issue. Ecology and Society, 11(1), 12.
Warren, D. M. (1990). Using indigenous knowledge in agricultural development. World Bank Discussion Paper No. 127. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Wickama, J. & Mowo, J. G. (2001). Using local resources to improve soil fertility in Tanzania. Managing Africa’s soils No. 21. London: IIED.
Wisheu, I. C., Rosenzweig, M. L., Olsvig-Whittaker, L., & Shmida, A. (2000). What makes nutrient-poor Mediterranean heathlands so rich in plant diversity? Evolutionary Ecology Research, 2, 935–955.
Zarger, R. K., & Stepp, J. R. (2004). Persistance of botanical knowledge among Tzeltal Maya children. Current Anthropology, 45(3), 413–418.
Zent, S. (2001). Acculturation and ethnobotanical knowledge knowledge loss among the Piaroa of Venezuela. In L. Maffi (Ed.), On biocultural diversity: Linking language, knowledge and the environment (pp. 190–211). Washington, DC: Smithsonian.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
German, L. (2010). Local Knowledge and Scientific Perceptions: Questions of Validity in Environmental Knowledge. In: German, L., Ramisch, J., Verma, R. (eds) Beyond the Biophysical. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8826-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8826-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8825-3
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-8826-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)