Skip to main content

Structural Damage and Risk Assessment and Uncertainty Quantification

  • Conference paper
Damage Assessment and Reconstruction after War or Natural Disaster

This article concentrates on the interplay between structural damage and risk assessment on one hand and numerical techniques, especially for uncertainty quantification, on the other hand. It shows the connection between damage assessment and risk quantification, touching on the methods of probabilistic risk assessment (PRA). It then details on how to initially asses the damage, which by necessity will involve some uncertainty, and how to update that initial assessment through additional testing. This is essential a statistical system identification process. The decision making process of finding whether the structure should be repaired or demolished is also mentioned shortly. It should involve a cost/benefit appraisal in the light of the information gained on the extent of the damage. Especially if the damage was caused by environmental forces, e.g. such as seismic action, it may be advantageous to determine the characteristic of this external action which caused the damage. This is a similar problem to the system identification of the structure, only that the testing is purely computational. Having identified the cause and the extent of the damage, one may want to draw lessons as to mitigate the hazard due future extreme environmental effect, in the form of robust design, minimizing vulnerability of life-lines and the fragility of structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Augusti, G., Baratta, A., and Casciati, F. (1984) Probabilistic Methods in Structural Engineering, Chapman&Hall, London.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Haim, Y. and Elishakoff, I. (1990) Convex Models of Uncertainty in Applied Mechanics, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Box, G. E., William, G. and Hunter, J. S. H. (2005) Statistics for Experimenters: Design, Innovation, and Discovery, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Caflisch, R. E. (1998) Monte Carlo and quasi-Monte Carlo methods, Acta Numer.7, 1–49.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chernoff, H. (1972) Sequential Analysis and Optimal Design, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, A. P. (1968) A generalization of Bayesian inference, J. Royal Stat. Soc.—SerB 30, 205–247.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ditlevsen, O. and Madsen, H. O. (1996) Structural Reliability Methods, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, J. (2007) Physical vulnerability modelling in natural hazard risk assessment, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.(http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/7/283/2007/) 7, 283–288.

  • Elishakoff, I. (1999) Whys and Hows in Uncertainty Modelling—Probability, Fuzziness, and Anti-optimization, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • FEMA (2004) HAZUS-MH Technical Manual, Washington, DC http://www.fema.gov/hazus/dl-sr2.shtm.

  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2006) From Nobel Prize to project management: Getting risks right, Proj. Manage.J. 37, 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghanem, R. and Spanos, P. (1991) Stochastic Finite Elements — A Spectral Approach, Springer, Berlin.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, D. (2007) How to Measure Anything: Finding the Value of Intangibles in Business, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ. in Engineering, Uncertainly (2000) (http://www.uncertainty-in-engineering.net/).

  • Jaynes, E. T. (2003) Probability Theory, The Logic of Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S. and Garrick, B. J. (1981) On the quantitative definition of risk, Risk Anal. 1, 11–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khuri, A. and Cornell, J. (1987) Response Surfaces: Designs and Analyses, Marcel Dekker, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • King, A., Kiremidjian, S., Basöz, N., Law, K., Vučetić, M., Doroudian, M., Olson, R., Eidinger, J., Goettel, K., and Horner, G. (1997) Methodologies for evaluating the socio-economic consequences of large earthquakes, Earthq. Spect. 13, 565–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleiber, M. and Hien, T. D. (1992) The Stochastic Finite Element Method. Basic Perturbation Technique and Computer Implementation, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. H. (1921) Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit, Hart, Schaffner&Marx; Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krée, P. and Soize, C. (1986) Mathematics of Random Phenomena — Random Vibrations of Mechanical Structures, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kumamoto, H. and Henley, E. J. (1996) Probabilistic risk assessment and management for engineers and scientists, IEEE Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindley, D. V. (1972) Bayesian Statistics, a Review, SIAM, Philadelphia PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindley, D. V. (2006) Understanding uncertainty, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ljung, L. (1999) System Identification — Theory for the User, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loève, M. (1977) Probability Theory, Springer, Berlin.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Matthies, H. G. (2007a) Quantifying uncertainty: Modern computational representation of probability and applications. In A. Ibrahimbegovíc and I. Kožar (Eds.), Extreme Man-Made and Natural Hazards in Dynamics of Structures, NATO-ARW, Springer, Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthies, H. G. (2007b) Uncertainty quantification with stochastic finite elements. In E. Stein, R. de Borst, and T. J. R. Hughes, (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Computational Mechanics. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthies, H. G. and Bucher, C. (1999) Finite elements for stochastic media problems, Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 168, 3–17.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Matthies, H. G. and Keese, A. (2005) Galerkin methods for linear and nonlinear elliptic stochastic partial differential equations, Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 194, 1295–1331.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Matthies, H. G, Brenner, C.E. and Soares, C. G. B. (1997) Uncertainties in probabilistic numerical analysis of structures and solids — stochastic finite elements, J. Stuct. Safety 19(3), 283–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möller, B. and Beer, M. (1998) Safety assessment using fuzzy theory, In: Proceedings of the 1998 International Computing Congress in Civil EngineeringASCE, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möller, B. and Beer, M. (2004) Fuzzy Randomness, Springer, Berlin.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Möller, B. and Reuter, U. (2007) Uncertainty Forecasting in Engineering, Springer, Berlin.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Natke, H. G. and Ben-Haim, Y. (1997) Uncertainty: Models and Measures, Akademie, Berlin.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Natke, H. G. and Cempel, C. (1997) Model-Aided Diagnosis of Mechanical Systems, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Net, F. R. (2000) http://www.floodrisknet.org.uk/.

  • Pearl, J. (2000) Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Revadigar, S. and Mau, S. T. (1999) Automated multi-criterion building damage assessment from seismic data, J. Struct. Eng. 125(2), 211–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schueller, G. (1997) A state of the art report on computational stochastic mechanics, Prob. Eng. Mech. 12(4), 197–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, G. (1976) A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Starr, C. (1969) Social benefit versus technological risk, Science 165(3899), 1232–1238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannert, C., Elvers, H.-D., and Jandrig, B. (2007) The ethics of uncertainty, EMBO Rep. 8(10), 892–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. and Crouch, E. (2001) Risk/Benefit Analysis, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiu, D. and Karniadakis, G. E. (2002) Modeling uncertainty in steady state diffusion problems via generalized polynomial chaos, Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 191, 4927– 4948.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yao, J. T. P. and Kawamura, H. (2001) On structural reliability, J. Temporal Des. Arch. Environ. 12, 34–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, H. (1992) Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications, Kluwer, Boston London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Matthies, H.G. (2009). Structural Damage and Risk Assessment and Uncertainty Quantification. In: Ibrahimbegovic, A., Zlatar, M. (eds) Damage Assessment and Reconstruction after War or Natural Disaster. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2386-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2386-5_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2384-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-90-481-2386-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics