Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Art and Science of Esophageal Anastomosis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Innovation in Esophageal Surgery

Abstract

The esophageal anastomosis is prone to leak and development of stricture. Tumor recurrence at the anastomosis is also a difficult problem to treat. Many aspects of the esophageal anastomosis are controversial. The choice of the site of the anastomosis is dependent on the location of the tumor and the method of esophagectomy. An adequate proximal resection margin ensures a low incidence of anastomotic recurrence. Leak from the esophageal anastomosis is largely technique-dependent. A hand-sewn or anastomosis with a circular stapler are equally safe though in some studies the later resulted in a higher stricture rate. This is avoided with the use of a semi-mechanical method with a linear stapler. Gastric conduit ischemia also predisposes to leaks; ischemic pre-conditioning of the gastric conduit though promising in the laboratory, has failed to result in better clinical outcome. Meticulous construction of the anastomosis and careful preparation of the gastric conduit with a tension free anastomosis are the keys to success. Death from anastomotic leak should be uncommon with modern peri-operative care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Orringer MB, Marshall B, Chang AC et al (2007) Two thousand transhiatal esophagectomies: changing trends, lessons learned. Ann Surg 246(3):363–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tsutsui S, Kuwano H, Watanabe M et al (1995) Resection margin for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Ann Surg 222(2):193–202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lam KY, Ma LT, Wong J (1996) Measurement of extent of spread of oesophageal squamous carcinoma by serial sectioning. J Clin Pathol 49:124–129

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Law S, Suen DT, Wong KH et al (2005) A single-layer, continuous, hand-sewn method for esophageal anastomosis: prospective evaluation in 218 patients. Arch Surg 140(1):33–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Siu KF, Cheung HC, Wong J (1986) Shrinkage of the esophagus after resection for carcinoma. Ann Surg 203(2):173–176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Law S, Arcilla C, Chu KM et al (1998) The significance of histologically infiltrated resection margin after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Am J Surg 176:286–290

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Urschel JD (1995) Esophagogastrostomy anastomotic leaks complicating esophagectomy: a review. Am J Surg 169:634–640

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zieren HU, Muller JM, Pichlmaier H (1993) Prospective randomized study of one- or two-layer anastomosis following oesophageal resection and cervical oesophagogastrostomy. Br J Surg 80(5):608–611

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Biere SS, Maas KW, Cuesta MA et al (2011) Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Surg 28(1):29–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Goldfaden D, Orringer MB, Appelman HD et al (1986) Adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus and gastric cardia: comparison of results of transhiatal esophagectomy and thoracoabdominal esophagogastrectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 91:242–247

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lam TC, Fok M, Cheng SW et al (1992) Anastomotic complications after esophagectomy for cancer. A comparison of neck and chest anastomoses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 104(2):395–400

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Liebermann-Meffert DMI, Meier R, Siewert JR (1992) Vascular anatomy of the gastric tube used for esophageal reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg 54:1110–1115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Peters JH, Kronson JW, Katz M et al (1995) Arterial anatomic considerations in colon interposition for esophageal replacement. Arch Surg 130:858–863

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Davis PA, Law S, Wong J (2003) Colonic interposition after esophagectomy for cancer. Arch Surg 138(3):303–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Holscher AH, Schneider PM, Gutschow C et al (2007) Laparoscopic ischemic conditioning of the stomach for esophageal replacement. Ann Surg 245(2):241–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schroder W, Holscher AH, Bludau M et al (2010) Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy with and without laparoscopic conditioning of the gastric conduit. World J Surg 34(4):738–743

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bludau M, Holscher AH, Vallbohmer D et al (2010) Ischemic conditioning of the gastric conduit prior to esophagectomy improves mucosal oxygen saturation. Ann Thorac Surg 90(4):1121–1126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Urschel JD, Blewett CJ, Bennett WF et al (2001) Handsewn or stapled esophagogastric anastomoses after esophagectomy for cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dis Esophagus 14(3–4):212–217

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim RH, Takabe K (2010) Methods of esophagogastric anastomoses following esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review. J Surg Oncol 101(6):527–533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Law S, Fok M, Chu KM et al (1997) Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 226(2):169–173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu QR, Wang KN, Wang WP et al (2011) Linear stapled esophagogastrostomy is more effective than hand-sewn or circular stapler in prevention of anastomotic stricture: a comparative clinical study. J Gastrointest Surg 15(6):915–921

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Johansson J, Oberg S, Wenner J et al (2009) Impact of proton pump inhibitors on benign anastomotic stricture formations after esophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction: results from a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 250(5):667–673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dai JG, Zhang ZY, Min JX et al (2011) Wrapping of the omental pedicle flap around esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surgery 149(3):404–410

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bhat MA, Dar MA, Lone GN et al (2006) Use of pedicled omentum in esophagogastric anastomosis for prevention of anastomotic leak. Ann Thorac Surg 82(5):1857–1862

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Patil PK, Patel SG, Mistry RC et al (1992) Cancer of the esophagus: esophagogastric anastomotic leak- a retrospective study of predisposing factors. J Surg Oncol 49(3):163–167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Whooley BP, Law S, Alexandrou A et al (2001) Critical appraisal of the significance of intrathoracic anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for cancer. Am J Surg 181(3):198–203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lorentz T, Fok M, Wong J (1989) Anastomotic leakage after resection and bypass for esophageal cancer: lessons learned from the past. World J Surg 13(4):472–477

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Murthy SC, Law S, Whooley BP et al (2003) Atrial fibrillation after esophagectomy is a marker for postoperative morbidity and mortality. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 126(4):1162–1167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nguyen NT, Hinojosa MW, Fayad C et al (2007) Minimally invasive management of intrathoracic leaks after esophagogastrectomy. Surg Innov 14(2):96–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wedemeyer J, Brangewitz M, Kubicka S et al (2010) Management of major postsurgical gastroesophageal intrathoracic leaks with an endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure system. Gastrointest Endosc 71(2):382–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kauer WKH, Stein HJ, Dittler HJ, Siewert JR Stent implantation as a treatment option in patients with thoracic anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy Surg Endosc 2008;22:50–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hunerbein M, Stroszczynski C, Moesta KT et al (2004) Treatment of thoracic anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy with self-expanding plastic stents. Ann Surg 240(5):801–807

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Dai YY, Gretschel S, Dudeck O et al (2009) Treatment of oesophageal anastomotic leaks by temporary stenting with self-expanding plastic stents. Br J Surg 96(8):887–891

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mok VW, Ting AC, Law S et al (2004) Combined endovascular stent grafting and endoscopic injection of fibrin sealant for aortoenteric fistula complicating esophagectomy. J Vasc Surg 40(6):1234–1237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Division of Esophageal and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, 102 Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, China

    Simon Law

Authors
  1. Simon Law
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Law .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Department ofSurgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese (Mi), Italy

    Luigi Bonavina

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Law, S. (2012). The Art and Science of Esophageal Anastomosis. In: Bonavina, L. (eds) Innovation in Esophageal Surgery. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2469-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2469-4_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-2468-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2469-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation