Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Clinical Neurophysiology of the Pelvic Floor

  • Chapter
Pelvic Floor Disorders

Abstract

Electrodiagnostic testing of the pelvic floor is becoming increasingly common in clinical pelvic medicine and pelvic floor research. Clinically, it can be used with history, physical examination, and urodynamic testing to aid in the diagnosis of certain pelvic floor disorders and to determine if a central or peripheral neurologic problems exists. Electrodiagnostic testing is also emerging in studies investigating the etiology of pelvic floor disorders. A basic understanding of the principles and techniques used in electrodiagnostic medicine is essential for reconstructive pelvic surgeons. However, most pelvic surgeons will never have the skills or expertise to perform pelvic floor neurophysiologic testing. Multidisciplinary teams including urogynecologic, urologic, and colorectal surgeons, physiatrists, neurologists, and physical therapists are imperative if we are going to improve our understanding of pelvic floor disorders and improve treatment outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kiff ES, Swash M. Slowed conduction in the pudendal nerves in idiopathic (neurogenic) faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 1984;71:614–616.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Snooks SJ, Swash M, Mathers SE, Henry MM. Effect of vaginal delivery on the pelvic floor: A 5-year follow-up. Br J Surg 1990;77:1358–1360.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Snooks SJ, Swash M, Henry MM, Setchell M. Risk factors in childbirth causing damage to the pelvic floor innervation. Int J Colorectal Dis 1986;1:20–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Snooks SJ, Badenoch DF, Tiptaft RC, Swash M. Perineal nerve damage in genuine stress urinary incontinence. An electrophysiological study. Br J Urol 1985;57:422–426.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Snooks SJ, Henry MM, Swash M. Faecal incontinence due to external anal sphincter division in childbirth is associated with damage to the innervation of the pelvic floor musculature: A double pathology. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985; 92:824–828.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Snooks SJ. Risk factors in childbirth causing damage to the pelvic floor innervation. Br J Surg 1985;72(suppl):S15–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Snooks SJ, Barnes PR, Swash M. Damage to the innervation of the voluntary anal and periurethral sphincter musculature in incontinence: an electrophysiological study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1984;47:1269–1273.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Snooks SJ, Swash M. Abnormalities of the innervation of the urethral striated sphincter musculature in incontinence. Br J Urol 1984;56:401–405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Olsen AL, Ross M, Stansfield RB, Kreiter C. Pelvic floor nerve conduction studies: Establishing clinically relevant normative data. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:1114–1119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mahajan ST, Fitzgerald MP, Kenton K et al. Concentric needle electrodes are superior to perineal surface-patch electrodes for electromyographic documentation of urethral sphincter relaxation during voiding. BJU Int 2006;97:117–120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Podnar S, Vodusek DB. Standardization of anal sphincter electromyography: Utility of motor unit potential parameters. Muscle Nerve 2001;24:946–951.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Enck P, Franz H, Azpiroz F et al. Innervation zones of the external anal sphincter in healthy male and female subjects. Preliminary results. Digestion 2004;69:123–130.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Merletti R, Bottin A, Cescon C et al. Multichannel surface EMG for the non-invasive assessment of the anal sphincter muscle. Digestion 2004;69:112–122.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Oelrich TM. The striated urogenital sphincter muscle in the female. Anat Rec 1983;205:223–232.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Junemann KP, Schmidt RA, Melchior H, Tanagho EA. Neuroanatomy and clinical significance of the external urethral sphincter. Urol Int 1987;42:132–136.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Barber MD, Bremer RE, Thor KB et al. Innervation of the female levator ani muscles. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:64–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Snooks SJ, Barnes PR, Swash M. Damage to the innervation of the voluntary anal and periurethral sphincter musculature in incontinence: an electrophysiological study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1984;47:1269–1273.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Snooks SJ, Swash M, Henry MM. Abnormalities in central and peripheral nerve conduction in patients with anorectal incontinence. J R Soc Med 1985;78:294–300.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Snooks SJ, Barnes PR, Swash M, Henry MM. Damage to the innervation of the pelvic floor musculature in chronic constipation. Gastroenterology 1985;89:977–981.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gilliland R, Altomare DF, Moreira H Jr et al. Pudendal neuropathy is predictive of failure following anterior overlapping sphincteroplasty. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:1516–1522.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sangwan YP, Coller JA, Barrett RC et al. Unilateral pudendal neuropathy. Impact on outcome of anal sphincter repair. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:686–689.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen AS, Luchtefeld MA, Senagore AJ et al. Pudendal nerve latency. Does it predict outcome of anal sphincter repair? Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:1005–1009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gregory WT, Lou JS, Stuyvesant A, Clark AL. Quantitative electromyography of the anal sphincter after uncomplicated vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:327–335.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kondo Y, Homma Y, Takahashi S et al. Transvaginal ultrasound of urethral sphincter at the mid urethra in continent and incontinent women. J Urol 2001;165:149–152.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Heit M. Intraurethral sonography and the test-retest reliability of urethral sphincter measurements in women. J Clin Ultrasound 2002;30:349–355.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kenton K, FitzGerald MP, Shott S, Brubaker L. Role of urethral electromyography in predicting outcome of burch retropubic urethropexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185:51–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fischer JR, Hale DS, McClellan E, Benson JT. The use of urethral electrodiagnosis to select the method of surgery in women with instrinsic sphincter deficiency. Int Urogynecol J 2001;12(suppl 1):51.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zivkovic F, Tamussino K, Ralph G et al. Long-term effects of vaginal dissection on the innervation of the striated urethral sphincter. Obstet Gynecol 1996;87:257–260.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Benson JT, McClellan E. The effect of vaginal dissection on the pudendal nerve. Obstet Gynecol 1993;82:387–389.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Benson JT, Lucente V, McClellan E. Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: A prospective randomized study with longterm outcome evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175:1418–1421; discussion 1421-1422.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Maher CF, Qatawneh AM, Dwyer PL et al. Abdominal sacral colpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: A prospective randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;190:20–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Fynes M, Donnelly VS, O’Connell PR, O’Herlihy C. Cesarean delivery and anal sphincter injury. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:496–500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Podnar S, Lukanovic A, Vodusek DB. Anal sphincter electromyography after vaginal delivery: Neuropathic insufficiency or normal wear and tear? Neurourol Urodyn 2000;19:249–257.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Urology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA

    W. Thomas Gregory MD

  2. Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery, Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Urology, Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA

    Kimberly Kenton MD

Authors
  1. W. Thomas Gregory MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kimberly Kenton MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Pelvic Floor Unit and Colorectal Service 1st Department of General Surgery, Regional Hospital, Treviso, Italy

    Giulio Aniello Santoro (Head) (Head)

  2. Department of Pediatric Radiology Children’s Teaching Hospital, Skubiszewski Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland

    Andrzej Paweł Wieczorek

  3. Diagnostic Imaging, Princess Grace Hospital, London, UK

    Clive I. Bartram

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gregory, W.T., Kenton, K. (2010). Clinical Neurophysiology of the Pelvic Floor. In: Santoro, G.A., Wieczorek, A.P., Bartram, C.I. (eds) Pelvic Floor Disorders. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1542-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1542-5_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-1541-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-1542-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation