Skip to main content
  • 1764 Accesses

Abstract

Over the past three decades, the following view has gained increasing favor throughout the medical community: clinical practice should be based on the critical evaluation of the results obtained from medical scientific research. Today this evaluation is greatly favored by Internet which provides instantaneous online access to the most recent studies even before they appear in print form. The possibility of instantaneously accessing quality-filtered and relevance-filtered secondary publications (meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and guidelines) has become real in routine practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Acheson L, Mitchell L (1993) The routine antenatal diagnostic imaging with ultrasound study. The challenge to practice evidence-based obstetrics. Arch Fam Med 2:1229–1231

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • American College of Radiology (2003) ACR breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS): Breast Imaging Atlas. American College of Radiology, Reston, Va

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrivé L, Tubiana JM (2002) “Evidence-based” radiology. J Radiol 83:661

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barr HJ, Ohlhaber T, Finder C (2006) Focusing in on dose reduction: the FDA perspective. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:1716–1717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett JD (2003) Evidence-based radiology problems. Covered stent treatment of an axillary artery pseudoaneurysm: June 2003-June 2004. Can Assoc Radiol J 54:140–143

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore CC (2003) Evidence-based imaging evaluation of the cervical spine in trauma. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 13:283–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore CC (2004) Critically assessing the radiology literature. Acad Radiol 11:134–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brealey SD; Damask (Direct Access to Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Assessment for Suspect Knees) Trial Team (2007) Influence of magnetic resonance of the knee on GPs’ decisions: a randomised trial. Br J Gen Pract 57:622–629

    Google Scholar 

  • Bui AA, Taira RK, Dionisio JD et al (2002) Evidence-based radiology: requirements for electronic access. Acad Radiol 9:662–669

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen WA, Giauque AP, Hallam DK et al (2003) Evidence-based approach to use of MR imaging in acute spinal trauma. Eur J Radiol 48:49–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union (1997) Council Directive 97/43/Euratom of 30 June 1997 on health protection of individuals against the dangers of ionizing radiation in relation with medical exposure, and repealing Directive 84/466/Euratom. J Eur Commun L 180:22–27 (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/dat/1997/en_397L0043.htlm)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon AK (1997) Evidence-based diagnostic radiology. Lancet 350:509–512

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dodd JD (2007) Evidence-based practice in radiology: steps 3 and 4 — Appraise and apply diagnostic radiology literature. Radiology 242:342–354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dodd JD, MacEneaney PM, Malone DE (2004) Evidence-based radiology: how to quickly assess the validity and strength of publications in the diagnostic radiology literature. Eur Radiol 14:915–922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Erden A (2004) Evidence based radiology Tani Girisim Radyol 10:89–91

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evidence-Based Radiology Working Group (2001) Evidence-based radiology: a new approach to the practice of radiology. Radiology 220:566–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fineberg HV, Bauman R, Sosman M (1977) Computerized cranial tomography. Effect on diagnostic and therapeutic plans. JAMA 238:224–227

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fryback DG, Thornbury JR (1991) The efficacy of diagnostic imaging. Med Decis Making 11:88–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Galli G (2002) Guida alla statistica nelle scienze radiologiche. Ecoedizioni internazionali, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert FJ, Grant AM, Gillan MGC (2004) Low back pain: influence of early MR imaging or CT on treatment and outcome — multicenter randomized trial. Radiology 231:343–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giovagnoni A, Ottaviani L, Mensà A et al (2005) Evidence based medicine (EBM) and evidence based radiology (EBR) in the follow-up of the patients after surgery for lung and colon-rectal carcinoma. Radiol Med 109:345–357

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goergen SK, Fong C, Dalziel K, Fennessy G (2003) Development of an evidence-based guideline for imaging in cervical spine trauma. Australas Radiol 47:240–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh T (2006) How to read a paper. The basics of evidence-based medicine. 3rd ed. Blackwell, Oxford, England: ix-xii (a); 1-3 (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillerman RP, Brody AS, Kraus SJ (2002) Evidence-based guidelines for pediatric imaging: the example of the child with possible appendicitis. Pediatr Ann 31:629–640

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman BJ, Gatsonis CA (2008) When is the right time to conduct a clinical trial of a diagnostic imaging technology? Radiology 248:12–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingworth W, Jarvik JG (2007) Technology assessment in radiology: putting the evidence in evidence-based radiology. Radiology 244:31–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hunink MG, Glasziou PP, Siegel JE et al (2001) Decision making in health and medicine: integrating evidence and values. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunink MG, Krestin GP (2002) Study design for concurrent development, assessment, and implementation of new diagnostic imaging technology. Radiology 222:604–614

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvik JG (2002) Study design for the new millennium: changing how we perform research and practice medicine. Radiology 222:593–594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan HS, Bert RB, Chew P et al (2003) Magnetic resonance spectroscopy for brain tumors. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD:109

    Google Scholar 

  • Kainberger F, Czembirek H, Frühwald F et al (2002). Guidelines and algorithms: strategies for standardization of referral criteria in diagnostic radiology. Eur Radiol 12:673–679

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl CK, Träber F, Schild HH (2008) Whole-body high-field-strength (3.0-T) MR imaging in clinical practice. Part I. Technical considerations and clinical applications. Radiology 246:675–696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Launois R (2003) Economic assessment, a field between clinical research and observational studies. Bull Cancer 90:97–104

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JM, Kopans DB, McMahon PM et al (2008). Breast cancer screening in BRCA1 mutation carriers: effectiveness of MR imaging-Markov Monte Carlo decision analysis. Radiology 246:763–771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liedberg J, Panmekiate S, Petersson A, Rohlin M (1996) Evidence-based evaluation of three imaging methods for the temporomandibular disc. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 25:234–241

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie R, Dixon AK (1995) Measuring the effects of imaging: an evaluative framework. Clin Radiol 50:513–518

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malone DE (2007) Evidence-based practice in radiology: an introduction to the series. Radiology 242:12–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malone DE, Staunton M (2007) Evidence-based practice in radiology: step 5 (evaluate)-Caveats and common questions. Radiology 243:319–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matowe L, Gilbert FJ (2004) How to synthesize evidence for imaging guidelines. Clin Radiol 59:63–68

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Medina LS, Aguirre E, Zurakowski D (2003) Introduction to evidence-based imaging. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 13:157–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Medina LS, Blackmore CC (2006) Evidence-based imaging. 1st edn. Springer, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Medina LS, Blackmore CC (2007) Evidence-based radiology: review and dissemination. Radiology 244:331–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Möller-Hartmann W, Herminghaus S, Krings T et al (2002) Clinical application of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the diagnosis of intracranial mass lesions. Neuroradiology 44:371–381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mukerjee A (1999) Towards evidence based emergency medicine: best BETs from the Manchester Royal Infirmary. Magnetic resonance imaging in acute knee haemarthrosis. J Accid Emerg Med 16:216–217

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oei EH, Nikken JJ, Ginai AZ et al; From the Program for the Assessment of Radiological Technology (ART Program) (2008) Costs and effectiveness of a brief MRI examination of patients with acute knee injury. Eur Radiol 2008 Sep 16. [Epub ahead of print]

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouwendijk R, de Vries M, Stijnen T et al; From the Program for the Assessment of Radiological Technology (2008) Multicenter randomized controlled trial of the costs and effects of noninvasive diagnostic imaging in patients with peripheral arterial disease: the DIPAD trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:1349–1357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Plevritis SK (2005) Decision analysis and simulation modeling for evaluating diagnostic tests on the basis of patient outcomes. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:581–590

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad KN, Cole WC, Haase GM (2004) Radiation protection in humans: extending the concept of as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) from dose to biological damage. Br J Radiol 77:97–99

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond J, Trop I (2007) The practice of ethics in the era of evidence-based radiology. Radiology 244:643–649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • RCR Working Party (1998) Making the best use of a department of clinical radiology: guidelines for doctors. 4th edn. The Royal College of Radiologists, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA et al (1996) Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 312:71–72

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Semelka RC, Armao DM, Elias J Jr, Huda W (2007) Imaging strategies to reduce the risk of radiation in CT studies, including selective substitution with MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 25:900–909

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soares HP, Kumar A, Daniels S et al (2005) Evaluation of new treatments in radiation oncology: are they better than standard treatments? JAMA 293:970–978

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sunshine JH, Applegate KE (2004) Technology assessment for radiologists. Radiology 230:309–314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taïeb S, Vennin P (2001) Evidence-based medicine: towards evidence-based radiology. J Radiol 82:887–890

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thornbury JR (1994) Clinical efficacy of diagnostic imaging: love it or leave it. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162:1–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thornbury JR (1999) Intermediate outcomes: diagnostic and therapeutic impact. Acad Radiol 6[suppl 1]:S58–S65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tonelli MR (1998) The philosophical limits of evidence-based medicine. Acad Med 73:1234–1240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trinder L (2000) A critical appraisal of evidence-based practice. In: Trinder L, Reynolds S (eds) Evidence-based practice: a critical appraisal. Blackwell Science, Oxford, England:212–214

    Google Scholar 

  • van Beek EJ, Malone DE (2007) Evidence-based practice in radiology education: why and how should we teach it? Radiology 243:633–640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • White SJ, Ashby D, Brown PJ (2000) An introduction to statistical methods for health technology assessment. Health Technol Assess 4:i–iv, 1-59

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woolf SH, Grol R, Hutchinson A et al (1999) Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ 318:527–530

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2009). Introduction. In: Biostatistics for Radiologists. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1133-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1133-5_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-1132-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-1133-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics