Abstract
In this chapter we see how organic agriculture depends on solidarity between farmers and consumers. The purposes of protecting environment and human health cannot be achieved without a healthy society in which people know the situation of each other and the impact of their conducts on the environment and their neighbors. On the other hand, modern technology such as chemical fertilizers and pesticides deprived us of our understanding of environment and society. Many people are now interested in organic agriculture but the basis is our concern for a healthy society and therefore solidarity. Organic agriculture is a holistic system which promotes and enhances ecosystem, health, food safety and local environment etc. Organic agriculture can be roughly divided into two types, maintaining face-to-face relationships and the certification type found in Japan. In Korea, these days market of certified products is becoming more and more competitive, so that farmers with less competitiveness turn towards direct relationships with local consumers. In the Northeastern Thailand, many groups are performing organic agriculture already and these days local government has been promoting the organic agriculture.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
It is interesting to note that the different strategies of the large-scale and small-scale farmers corresponds to the two solutions which Axelrod showed to overcome the market failure, that is, label and territoriality (Axelrod 1984). In the case of organic agriculture, label corresponds to the certificate while territoriality corresponds to Teikei and face-to-face relationships (Kim 2009).
- 2.
The capability approach can be used for evaluating human development, inequality and poverty, too.
References
Adachi K (2002) Korean agricultural policies shift towards an environmentally friendly agriculture: an interview with Minister of Agriculture and Chief of Staff of Agriculture in the Executive Mansion. J Agric Policy Res 2:220–232 (in Japanese)
Axelrod R (1984) The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books Inc., Publishers, New York
Heo J (2000) An empirical assessment of environment-friendly agriculture programs. Korea Rural Econ Rev 23(1) (Korea Rural Economic Institute, in Korean)
Honjo N (2004) Organic agriculture in Japan-problem of policies and institution. Noubunkyo (in Japanese)
Huh G-H (2000) Emerging issues for Korean agriculture in the 21st century. Korea Rural Econ Rev 23(1) (Korea Rural Economic Institute, in Korean)
Ikemoto Y, Kim K-H (2008) Organic Farming and Amartya Sen’s capability approach. Kokugakuin Univ Econ Rev 56(3, 4):437–481 (Kokugakuin University, in Japanese)
Kim K-H (2009) The role and challenges of organic agriculture: comparative study between Japan and Korea. Doctoral degree, The University of Tokyo (In Japanese)
Kim K-H (2011) Local-based organic agriculture: experience of Japan and Korea. Tsukuba-shobo, Japan (In Japanese)
Kubota H (2001) Perspective of organic agriculture movement and JAS of organic agricultural products. Kokugakuin Econ No 49-1 (In Japanese)
Nussbaum MC (2000) Women and human development: the capabilities approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Sen AK (1992) Inequality examined. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Sen AK (1999) Development as freedom. Knopf Press, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kim, KH., Ikemoto, Y. (2015). Role of Solidarity in Organic Agriculture. In: Matsui, N., Ikemoto, Y. (eds) Solidarity Economy and Social Business. SpringerBriefs in Economics. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55471-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55471-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-55470-7
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-55471-4
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)