Skip to main content

Quality Assessment in the Presence of Additional Data in Photovoltaics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control 10

Part of the book series: Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control ((FSQC,volume 10))

  • 1611 Accesses

Abstract

Acceptance sampling represents an important tool for quality control. The practical methods of choice for non-normal variables are attribute sampling and variables sampling assuming normality applied to averages instead of single observations. Both methods usually lead to very large sample sizes and are therefore infeasible in practice if observations are expensive. We discuss and extend recent results developed for the photovoltaic industry and actively used there. Here – and presumably in other industries as well – additional data are available which can be used to construct valid and asymptotically optimal sampling plans for non-normal measurements. Consistency and asymptotic optimality of the sampling plans, which are random in our setup, as well as asymptotic normality of the required sample size are established under weak assumptions. We also provide sensitivity studies dealing with the effects of a systematic bias (shift) between the additional data and the lot (shipment), which may matter in practice. The new plans are investigated by simulations to some extent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bahadur, R. R. (1966) A note on quantiles in large samples. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 37, 577–580.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Herrmann, W., & Steland, A. (2010) Evaluation of photovoltaic modules based on sampling inspection using smoothed empirical quantiles. Progress in Photovoltaics, 18(1), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Herrmann, W., Althaus, J., Steland, A., & Zaehle, H. (2006) Statistical and experimental methods for assessing the power output specification of PV modules. In Proceedings of the 21st European photovoltaic solar energy conference, Dresden (pp. 2416–2420).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Herrmann, W., Steland, A., & Herff, W. (2010) Sampling procedures for the validation of PV module output specification. In Proceedings of the 24th European photovoltaic solar energy conference, Hamburg (pp. 3540–3547). ISBN: 3-936338-25-6, doi: 10.4229/24thEUPVSEC2009-4AV.3.70.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hyndman R. J., & Fan Y. (1996) Sample quantiles in statistical packages. The American Statistician, 50(4), 361–364.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kiefer, J. (1967) On Bahadurs representation of sample quantiles. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 38, 1323–1342.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kuurne, J., Tolvanen, A., Hyvärinen, J., & Oy, E. (2008) Sweep time, spectral mismatch and ligh soaking in thin film module measurements. In PVSC ’08. 33rd IEEE, San Diego (pp. 1–3). ISSN 0160-8371.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Meisen, S. (2010) Ein nichtparametrisches Verfahren zur Annahmeprüfung. Diploma thesis, Institute of Statistics, RWTH Aachen University.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rau, U., Schmitt, M., & Parisi, J. (1989) Persistent photoconductivity in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 heterojunctions and thin films prepared by sequential deposition. Journal of Applied Physics, 73(2), 223–225.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Roy, J.N., Gariki, G.R., & Nagalakhsmi, V. (2010) Reference module selection criteria for accurate testing of photovoltaic (PV) panels. Solar Energy, 84, 32–36.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ruberto, M.N., & Rothwarf, J. (1987) Time-dependent open-circuit voltage in CuInSe2/CdS solar cells: Theory and experiment. Journal of Applied Physics, 61(9), 4662–4669.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schilling, D.G., & Neubauer, D.V. (2009) Acceptance sampling in quality control. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Steland, A., & Zaehle, H. (2009) Sampling inspection by variables: Nonparametric setting. Statistica Neerlandica, 63(1), 101–123.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Steland, A., Padmanabhan, A.R., & Akram, M. (2011) Resampling methods for the nonparametric and generalized Behrens-Fisher problems. Sankhya A, 73, 267–302.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Virtuani, A., Muellejans, H., Ponti, F., & Dunlop, E. (2010) Comparison of indoor and outdoor performance measurements of recent commercially available solar modules. In Proceedings of the 23th European photovoltaic solar energy conference, Hamburg (pp. 2379–2385). ISBN: 3-936338-25-6, doi: 10.4229/24thEUPVSEC2009-3CO.12.1.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge financial support from the German Federal Ministry of the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (grant no. 0325226).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sabine Meisen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Meisen, S., Pepelyshev, A., Steland, A. (2012). Quality Assessment in the Presence of Additional Data in Photovoltaics. In: Lenz, HJ., Schmid, W., Wilrich, PT. (eds) Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control 10. Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control, vol 10. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2846-7_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics