Skip to main content

Is There a Difference Between the Acute and Chronic Anti-Ischemic Efficacy of Nisoldipine?

  • Conference paper
Nisoldipine 1987

Summary

The number of calcium channel-blocking agents is still growing. The newly developed nisoldipine is a dihydropyridine derivative. In comparison with the mother compound nifedipine, nisoldipine has a higher vessel selectivity and a longer duration of action. This study was carried out to look for tolerance development or augmentation of antiischemic effects by comparing the results on the 1st day with those on the 21st day of treatment.

In 12 patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease, nisoldipine was tested (10 mg twice daily) in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study. Ergometric measurements were performed on 1 days, and 21 before, 3 h, and 7 h after drug administration. We analyzed ST-segment depression (ST), time to ST-segment depression of 1 mm (ST-1), blood pressure (BP), and heart rate (HR). Results are expressed in percentage differences at 3 h (*, P < 0.05).

In the dosage used, nisoldipine acutely administered led to significant changes in ST, ST-1, BP, and HR. With the exception of HR, in all parameters nisoldipine led to the same changes after 3 weeks of treatment. Thus, a development of tolerance or an augmentation of effects was not detectable. Nisoldipine demonstrated an antiischemic effect at 7 h and 10 h, the extent of which was not diminished from that seen at 3 h. Some patients were nonresponders to the drug after acute and after long-term treatment. Nisoldipine was well tolerated, with no undesired side effects.

This study was performed at the German Heart Center, Munich

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brügmann U, Dirschinger J, Blasini R, Rudolph W (1982) Antüschämische Wirksamkeit unterschiedlicher Nifedipindosen. Herz 7: 235

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brügmann U, Blasini R, Goebel G, Mannes A, Dirschinger J, Rudolph W (1982) UnterschiedlichesAnsprechen von Patienten mit stabiler Belastungs-Angina-pectoris auf Nifedipin. Herz 7: 117

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brügmann U, Blasini R, Reiniger G, Rudolph W (1986) Nutzen und Aussagefähigkeit von Verapamil Plasmaspiegelbestimmungen. Z Kardiol 75: 38

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brügmann U, Blasini R, Reiniger G, Rudolph W (1985) Antihypertensive und antiischämische Wirkung von Nitrendipin. Herz 10: 53

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kazda S, Garthoff B, Rämsch KD, Schlüter G (1983) Nisoldipine. New drugs annual: cardiovascular drugs. Raven, New York, p 243

    Google Scholar 

  6. Klein HH, Nordbeck H, Kreuzer H (1983) Der Einfluß des Calcium-Antagonisten Nisoldipin auf elektrophysiologische Parameter beim Menschen. Z Kardiol 72: 180

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Knorr A (1982) Nisoldipine (Bay K 5552) a new calcium antagonist. Antihypertensive effect in conscious unrestrained renal hypertensive dogs. Arch Int Pharmacodyn 260: 141

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Minderjahn KP, Hanrath P, Bleifeld W (1983) Einfluß von Nisoldipine auf die Ruhe- und Belastungshämodynamik des linken Ventrikels bei chronischer Linksherzinsuffizienz. Z Kardiol 72 [Suppl II]: 83

    Google Scholar 

  9. Suryapranata H, Serruys PW, Ribiero V, Wijns W, Slager C (1983) Acute hemodynamic effects of nisoldipine in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Asian-Pacific Congress of Cardiology (Abstr.) Taipeh, p 171

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vogt A, Kreuzer H (1983) Hemodynamic effects of nisoldipine in chronic congestive heart failure. Arzneimittelforsch 33(1): 877

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Brügmann, U.E. (1987). Is There a Difference Between the Acute and Chronic Anti-Ischemic Efficacy of Nisoldipine?. In: Hugenholtz, P.G., Meyer, J. (eds) Nisoldipine 1987. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73010-8_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73010-8_32

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-18394-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-73010-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics