Skip to main content

Capacitated Network Design Games

  • Conference paper
Algorithmic Game Theory (SAGT 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7615))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We study a capacitated symmetric network design game, where each of n agents wishes to construct a path from a network’s source to its sink, and the cost of each edge is shared equally among its agents. The uncapacitated version of this problem has been introduced by Anshelevich et al. (2003) and has been extensively studied. We find that the consideration of edge capacities entails a significant effect on the quality of the obtained Nash equilibria (NE), under both the utilitarian and the egalitarian objective functions, as well as on the convergence rate to an equilibrium. The following results are established. First, we provide bounds for the price of anarchy (PoA) and the price of stability (PoS) measures with respect to the utilitarian (i.e., sum of costs) and egalitarian (i.e., maximum cost) objective functions. Our main result here is that, unlike the uncapacitated version, the network topology is a crucial factor in the quality of NE. Specifically, a network topology has a bounded PoA if and only if it is series-parallel (SP). Second, we show that the convergence rate of best-response dynamics (BRD) may be super linear (in the number of agents). This is in contrast to the uncapacitated version, where convergence is guaranteed within at most n iterations.

This work was partially supported by the Israel Science Foundation (grant number 1219/09), by the Leon Recanati Fund of the Jerusalem School of Business Administration, the Google Inter-university center for Electronic Markets and Auctions, and the People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Unions Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under REA grant agreement number 274919. The authors wish to thank Eli Ben-Sasson and Irit Dinur for helpful discussion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 72.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albers, S.: On the value of coordination in network design. In: Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2008, pp. 294–303. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andelman, N., Feldman, M., Mansour, Y.: Strong Price of Anarchy. In: SODA 2007 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anshelevich, E., Dasgupta, A., Kleinberg, J., Tardos, E., Wexler, T., Roughgarden, T.: The price of stability for network design with fair cost allocation. In: Proceedings of the 45th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 295–304. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Anshelevich, E., Dasgupta, A., Tardos, É., Wexler, T.: Near-optimal network design with selfish agents. In: STOC, pp. 511–520 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bala, V., Goyal, S.: A noncooperative model of network formation. Econometrica 68(5), 1181–1230 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Corbo, J., Parkes, D.: The price of selfish behavior in bilateral network formation. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, PODC 2005, pp. 99–107. ACM, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Devanur, N.R., Mihail, M., Vazirani, V.V.: Strategyproof cost-sharing mechanisms for set cover and facility location games. In: Proc. of ACM EC, pp. 108–114 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Epstein, A., Feldman, M., Mansour, Y.: Strong equilibrium in cost sharing connection games. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, EC 2007, pp. 84–92. ACM, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Epstein, A., Feldman, M., Mansour, Y.: Efficient graph topologies in network routing games. Games and Economic Behavior 66(1), 115–125 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Even-Dar, E., Kesselman, A., Mansour, Y.: Convergence Time to Nash Equilibria. In: Baeten, J.C.M., Lenstra, J.K., Parrow, J., Woeginger, G.J. (eds.) ICALP 2003. LNCS, vol. 2719, pp. 502–513. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Fabrikant, A., Papadimitriou, C., Talwar, K.: The complexity of pure nash equilibria. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2004, pp. 604–612. ACM, New York (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Feldman, M., Tamir, T.: Convergence rate of best response dynamics in scheduling games with conflicting congestion effects. Working paper (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fotakis, D.: Congestion games with linearly independent paths: Convergence time and price of anarchy. Theory Comput. Syst. 47(1), 113–136 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Garey, M.R., Johnson, D.S.: Computers and Intractability; A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W. H. Freeman & Co., New York (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Holzman, R., Law-Yone, N.: Strong equilibrium in congestion games. Games and Economic Behavior 21(1-2), 85–101 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Holzman, R., Law-Yone (Lev-tov), N.: Network structure and strong equilibrium in route selection games. Mathematical Social Sciences 46(2), 193–205 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Koutsoupias, E., Papadimitriou, C.: Worst-Case Equilibria. In: Meinel, C., Tison, S. (eds.) STACS 1999. LNCS, vol. 1563, pp. 404–413. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen, H.L., Roughgarden, T.: Network design with weighted players. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architextures (SPAA), pp. 29–38 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Milchtaich, I.: Topological conditions for uniqueness of equilibrium in networks. Mathematics of Operations Research 30, 225–244 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Milchtaich, I.: The Equilibrium Existence Problem in Finite Network Congestion Games. In: Spirakis, P.G., Mavronicolas, M., Kontogiannis, S.C. (eds.) WINE 2006. LNCS, vol. 4286, pp. 87–98. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Milchtaich, I.: Network topology and the efficiency of equilibrium. Games and Economic Behavior 57(2), 321–346 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Monderer, D.: Potential games. Games and Economic Behavior 14(1), 124–143 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Papadimitriou, C.: Algorithms, games, and the internet. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2001, pp. 749–753. ACM, New York (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Rosenthal, R.W.: A class of games possessing pure-strategy nash equilibria. International Journal of Game Theory 2(1), 65–67 (1973)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Roughgarden, T., Tardos, É.: How bad is selfish routing? J. ACM 49(2), 236–259 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Feldman, M., Ron, T. (2012). Capacitated Network Design Games. In: Serna, M. (eds) Algorithmic Game Theory. SAGT 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7615. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33996-7_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33996-7_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33995-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33996-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics