Skip to main content

Financing Urban Logistics Projects

From Public Utility to Public–Private Partnerships

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Urban Logistics: Concepts, Methods and Information Systems

Part of the book series: EcoProduction ((ECOPROD))

Abstract

Urban goods movement and urban logistics started to be defined as a scientific discipline 20 years ago, where several actions in research, development, policy and deployment were started to be coordinated. However, most of the innovations and projects presented in that field are stopped or reduced because of a common constraint that becomes its worst enemy: the financing mechanisms. Although many studies deal with urban logistics, only a few of them show the difficulties at financing, but without entering in detail on the financing mechanisms. This chapter aims to present the main financing issues in urban logistics. First, the main categories of funding strategies that can be applied to urban logistics are presented, focusing on public–private interactions and collaborations. After that, a scenario assessment using a cost benefit analysis framework shows the different interests and issues of each category of stakeholders, and the main advantages and limits of each category of investment and financing strategies. Then, the fields of urban logistics that seem the most adapted to public–private collaboration in terms of financing are identified and commented. As a conclusion, guidelines for researchers and practitioners to take into account financing issues in urban logistics decision support are proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The following statements are made after a quantitative and a qualitative analyses of two delivery bay and road parking behaviour surveys (one in Bilbao, Spain and one in Lyon, France) made between 2011 and 2012 in the context of the FREILOT project. For a detailed description of the surveys and their main results, see Blanco et al. (2012).

References

  • Allen J, Thorne G, Browne M (2007) Good practice guide on urban freight. Bestufs, Rijswijk

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrosini C, Routhier JL (2004) Objectives, methods and results of surveys carried out in the field of urban freight transport: an international comparison. Trans Rev 24(1):57–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Augereau V, Dablanc L (2008) An evaluation of recent pick-up point experiments in European cities: the rise of two competing models? In: Taniguchi E, Thompson RG (eds) Innovations in city logistics. Nova Science, New York, pp 301–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey M (1996) Demographic decline in Late Medieval England: some thoughts on recent research. T. S. Ashton prize: joint winning essay. Econ Hist Rev New Ser 49(1):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanco R, Garcia E, Novo I, Pluvinet P, Gardrat M, Gonzalez-Feliu J, Sartre V, Salanova Grau JM, Koenders E (2012) FREILOT. Urban freight energy efficient pilot. D. FL. 4.2. Evaluation results. Ertico–ITS, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnafous A, Faivre d’Arcier B (2013) The conditions of efficiency of a PPP for public finances. 13th world conference on transport research, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 15–18 July 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnafous A, Jensen P, Roy W (2006) Le cofinancement usager—contribuable et le partenariat public-privé changent les termes de l’évaluation des programmes d’investissement public. Economie Prevision 175–176:15–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Boone JL, Myers JE, Redman CL (1990) Archeological and historical approaches to complex societies: the Islamic states of Medieval Morocco. Am Anthropol 92(3):630–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britnell RH (1995) A Commercialising economy: England 1086 to C. 1300. Manchester University Press, Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne M, Nemoto T, Visser J, Whiteing T (2004) Urban freight movements and public-private partnerships. In: Taniguchi E, Thompson RG (eds) Logistics systems for sustainable cities. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 17–36

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • CNR (2012) Evolution du prix du gazole et incidence sur le prix de revient. Situation au 30 juillet 2012, Comité National Routier, Paris, France, available at: www.cnr.fr/content/download/357/3457/version/15/file/Note%20gazole%2001%20ao%C3%BBt%202012.pdf

  • Danielis R, Marcucci E, Rotaris L (2005) Logistics managers’ stated preferences for freight service attributes. Transp Res Part E 41(3):201–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durand B, Gonzalez-Feliu J (2012) Impacts of proximity deliveries on e-grocery trips. Supply Chain Forum Int J 13(1):10–19

    Google Scholar 

  • French Ministery of Land Use and Transport (2005) Instruction-cadre relative aux méthodes d’èvaluation économique des grands projets d’infrastructures de transport du 25 mars 2004. Mise à jour de 2005, French Ministery of Land Use and Transport, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Feliu J (2008) Models and methods for the city logistics. The two-echelon capacitated vehicle routing problem. Ph.D. thesis, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Feliu J, Morana J (2010) Are city logistics solutions sustainable? The Cityporto case. TeMA J Land Use Mobility Environ 3(2):55–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Feliu J, Morana J (2011) Collaborative transportation sharing: from theory to practice via a case study from France. In: Yearwood JL, Stranieri A (eds) Technologies for supporting reasoning communities and collaborative decision making: cooperative approaches. Information Science Reference, Hershey, pp 252–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Feliu J, Salanova J (2012) Defining and evaluating collaborative urban freight distribution systems. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 39:172–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Feliu J, Durand B, Adirankaja D (2012) Urban logistics and e-grocery: have new B2C trends a positive impact on the environment? In: Golinska P, Romano CA (eds) Environmental issues in supply chain management—new trends and applications. Springer, Series: EcoProduction—Environmental Issues in Logistics and Manufacturing, Amsterdam, pp 251–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Feliu J, Faivre d’Arcier B, Rojas N, Basck P, Gardrat M, Lekuona G, Zubillaga F, Vernoux G (2013) FREILOT. Uban freight energy efficiency pilot. DL. 6.4—cost-benefit analysis. Ertico—ITS, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi Y, Morisugi H (2000) International comparison of background concept and methodology of transportation project appraisal. Transp Policy 7(1):73–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maccharis C, Melo S (2010) City distribution and urban freight transport: multiple perspectives. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • MODUM (2011) Mutualisation et Optimisation des Déplacements Urbains de Marchandises. Rapport intermédiaire, ANR, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Morana J, Gonzalez-Feliu J, Semet F (2013) Urban consolidation and logistics pooling. Planning, management and scenario assessment issues. In: Gonzalez-Feliu J, Semet F, Routhier JL (eds) Sustainable urban logistics: concepts, methods and information systems, Springer, Berlin, Chapter 10 of the present book

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogden K (1992) Urban goods movement: a guide to policy and planning. Ashgate, Brookfield

    Google Scholar 

  • PIARC Project (2012). Working group report. Public sector governance on urban freight transport

    Google Scholar 

  • Pluvinet P, Gonzalez-Feliu J, Ambrosini C (2012) GPS data analysis for understanding urban goods movement. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 39:450–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Quak H (2008) Sustainability of urban freight transport. Retail distribution and local regulations in cities. ERIM Ph.D. series research in management N. 124, TRAIL thesis series T2008/5, TRAIL Research School, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Regio DG (2008) Guide to cost benefit analysis of investment projects. European Commission, Directorate General Regional Policy, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith W (1875) A dictionary of Greek and Roman antiquities. John Murray, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Taniguchi E, Thompson RG (eds) (1999) City logistics I. Institute for City Logistics, Kyoto

    Google Scholar 

  • Taniguchi E, Thompson RG (eds) (2001) City logistics II. Institute for City Logistics, Kyoto

    Google Scholar 

  • Taniguchi E, Thompson RG (eds) (2004) Logistics systems for sustainable cities. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Taniguchi E, Thompson RG (eds) (2006) Recent advances in city logistics. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Taniguchi E, Thompson RG (eds) (2008) Innovations in city logistics. Nova Science Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Taniguchi E, Thompson RG (2010) The 6th international conference on city logistics. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 3 (2): 5897–6386

    Google Scholar 

  • Taniguchi E, Thompson RG (2012) The 7th international conference on city logistics. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 3(2):1–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trentini A, Malhéné N (2010) Toward a shared urban transport system ensuring passengers and goods cohabitation. TeMA J Land Use Mobility Environ 3(2):37–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Trentini A, Gonzalez-Feliu J, Malhéné N (2012) Developing urban logistics spaces: UCC and PLS in South-Western Europe. Working paper LET

    Google Scholar 

  • Ville S, Gonzalez-Feliu J, Dablanc L (2012) The limits of public policy intervention in urban logistics: lessons from Vicenza (Italy). Eur Plan Stud. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.722954

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2005) Valutation of time savings. Transport economics, policy and poverty group transport note n°-TR15, pp 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Wygonik E, Goodchild A (2012) Evaluating the efficacy of shared-use vehicles for reducing greenhouse gas emissions: a US case study of grocery delivery. J Transp Res Forum 51(2):111–126

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jesus Gonzalez-Feliu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gonzalez-Feliu, J., Taniguchi, E., Faivre d’Arcier, B. (2014). Financing Urban Logistics Projects. In: Gonzalez-Feliu, J., Semet, F., Routhier, JL. (eds) Sustainable Urban Logistics: Concepts, Methods and Information Systems. EcoProduction. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31788-0_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics