Abstract
An experimental study of the digital trust game in [2] is presented. The study consists of an initial survey followed by a four-part dynamic experiment investigating various aspects of digital trust decisions. Digital trust in online environments differs from its offline variants due to its unique characteristics such as near instantaneous communication, transient and impersonal nature of interactions, immediate access to opinions of others, and availability of high amount of (but often low quality) information. It is observed that while the game theory provides a suitable analytical framework for quantitative analysis of digital trust decisions, the model in [2] has its shortcomings. Firstly, the subjects do not seem to adopt an iterative best or gradient response strategy. They exhibit significant (mental) inertia and only respond to new information or significant situation changes. Secondly, they take into account signals from their social circle much more than aggregate signals such as average scores. Both of these results and additional insights gained have important implications for future game theoretic modeling efforts of digital trust.
This work is supported by Deutsche Telekom Laboratories. T. Alpcan was with Technical Univ. of Berlin and Deutsche Telekom Laboratories during this research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alpcan, T., Başar, T.: Network Security: A Decision and Game Theoretic Approach. Cambridge University Press (2011)
Alpcan, T., Örencik, C., Levi, A., Savaş, E.: A game theoretic model for digital identity and trust in online communities. In: Proc. of the 5th ACM Symp. on Information, Computer and Communications Security, ASIACCS 2010, pp. 341–344. ACM, New York (2010), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1755688.1755735
Anderhub, V., Engelmann, D., Güth, W.: An experimental study of the repeated trust game with incomplete information. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 48(2), 197–216 (2002), http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268101002165
Camerer, C.F.: Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton University Press (2003), http://press.princeton.edu/titles/7517.html
Dellarocas, C.: The digitization of word-of-mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Tech. rep., MIT Dspace, United States (2003), http://dspace.mit.edu/dspace-oai/request , http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/1851
Despotovic, Z., Aberer, K.: P2p reputation management: Probabilistic estimation vs. social networks. Computer Networks 50(4), 485–500 (2006), management in Peer-to-Peer Systems, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389128605002161
Engle-Warnick, J., Slonim, R.L.: The evolution of strategies in a repeated trust game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 55(4), 553–573 (2004), trust and Trustworthiness, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268104000721
Engle-Warnick, J., Slonim, R.L.: Inferring repeated-game strategies from actions: evidence from trust game experiments. Economic Theory 28, 603–632 (2006), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00199-005-0633-6 , doi: 10.1007/s00199-005-0633-6
Hubbard, W.D.: How to measure anything finding the value of ’intangibles’ in business. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken (2007)
Josang, A., Ismail, R., Boyd, C.: A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision. Decision Support Syst. 43(2), 618–644 (2007)
King-Casas, B., Tomlin, D., Anen, C., Camerer, C.F., Quartz, S.R., Montague, P.R.: Getting to know you: Reputation and trust in a two-person economic exchange. Science 308(5718), 78–83 (2005), http://www.sciencemag.org/content/308/5718/78.abstract
Lorenz, J., Rauhut, H., Schweitzer, F., Helbing, D.: How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect. Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences (2011), http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2011/05/10/1008636108.abstract
Marden, J., Arslan, G., Shamma, J.: Joint strategy fictitious play with inertia for potential games. In: 44th IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control and 2005 European Control Conf. CDC-ECC 2005, pp. 6692–6697 (December 2005)
Mcluhan, M., Fiore, Q.: The Medium is the Massage. Gingko Press, http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=citeulike07-20&path=ASIN/1584230703
Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R.: Trust among strangers in Internet transactions: Empirical analysis of eBay’s reputation system. In: Baye, M.R. (ed.) The Economics of the Internet and E-Commerce, Advances in Applied Microeconomics, vol. 11, pp. 127–157. Elsevier Science (2002), http://www.si.umich.edu/~presnick/papers/ebayNBER/index.html
Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R., Swanson, J., Lockwood, K.: The value of reputation on ebay: A controlled experiment. Experimental Economics 9, 79–101 (2006), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10683-006-4309-2 , doi: 10.1007/s10683-006-4309-2
Yan, Z., Holtmanns, S.: Trust modeling and management: from social trust to digital trust. In: Subramanian, R. (ed.) Computer Security, Privacy, and Politics: Current Issues, Challenges, and Solutions. IRM Press, IGI Global (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Alpcan, T., Levi, A., Savaş, E. (2011). Digital Trust Games: An Experimental Study. In: Baras, J.S., Katz, J., Altman, E. (eds) Decision and Game Theory for Security. GameSec 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7037. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25280-8_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25280-8_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-25279-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-25280-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)