Skip to main content

A Survey and Empirical Comparison of Object Ranking Methods

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Preference Learning

Abstract

Ordered lists of objects are widely used as representational forms. Such ordered objects include Web search results or bestseller lists. In spite of their importance, methods of processing orders have received little attention. However, research concerning orders has recently become common; in particular, researchers have developed various methods for the task of Object Ranking to acquire functions for object sorting from example orders. Here, we give a unified view of these methods and compare their merits and demerits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    quantification of respondents’ sensations or impressions

  2. 2.

    This data set can be downloaded from http://www.kamishima.net/sushi/

References

  1. J.I. Marden, Analyzing and Modeling Rank Data, Vol. 64, Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability (Chapman & Hall, 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Kendall, J.D. Gibbons, Rank Correlation Methods, 5th edn. (Oxford University Press, 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  3. K.J. Arrow, Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd edn. (Yale University Press, 1963)

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Bollegala, N. Okazaki, M. Ishizuka, A machine learning approach to sentence ordering for multidocument summarization and its evaluation, in Proceedings of the Natural Language Processing society of Japan (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Dwork, R. Kumar, M. Naor, D. Sivakumar, Rank aggregation methods for the Web, in Proceedings of The 10th International Conference on World Wide Web (2001), pp. 613–622

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Agresti, Categorical Data Analysis, 2nd edn. (Wiley, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. McCullagh, Regression models for ordinal data. J. Royal Stat. Soc. B 42(2), 109–142 (1980)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Shashua, A. Levin, Ranking with large margin principle: Two approaches, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 15 (2003), pp. 961–968

    Google Scholar 

  9. W.W. Cohen, R.E. Schapire, Y. Singer, Learning to order things. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 10, 243–270 (1999)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Grötschel, M. Jünger, G. Reinelt, A cutting plane algorithm for the linear ordering problem. Oper. Res. 32(6), 1195–1220 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. N. Littlestone, Learning quickly when irrelevant attributes abound: A new linear-threshold algorithm. Mach. Learn. 2, 285–318 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Y. Freund, R. Iyer, R.E. Schapire, Y. Singer, An efficient boosting algorithm for combining preferences, in Proceedings of The 15th International Conference on Machine Learning (1998), pp. 170–178

    Google Scholar 

  13. Y. Freund, R. Iyer, R.E. Schapire, Y. Singer, An efficient boosting algorithm for combining preferences. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 4, 933–969 (2003)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. H. Kazawa, T. Hirao, E. Maeda, Order SVM: a kernel method for order learning based on generalized order statistics. Syst. Comput. Jpn. 36(1), 35–43 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. R. Herbrich, T. Graepel, P. Bollmann-Sdorra, K. Obermayer, Learning preference relations for information retrieval, in ICML-98 Workshop: Text Categorization and Machine Learning (1998), pp. 80–84

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Herbrich, T. Graepel, K. Obermayer, Support vector learning for ordinal regression, in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks (1999), pp. 97–102

    Google Scholar 

  17. T. Joachims, Optimizing search engines using clickthrough data, in Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2002), pp. 133–142

    Google Scholar 

  18. O. Luaces, G.F. Bayón, J.R. Quevedo, J. Díez, J.J. del Coz, A. Bahamonde, Analyzing sensory data using non-linear preference learning with feature subset selection, in Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Machine Learning (2004), pp. 286–297 [LNAI 3201]

    Google Scholar 

  19. T. Kamishima, H. Kazawa, S. Akaho, Supervised ordering – an empirical survey, in Proceedings of The 5th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (2005), pp. 673–676

    Google Scholar 

  20. B.C. Arnold, N. Balakrishnan, H.N. Nagaraja, A First Course in Order Statistics (Wiley, 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  21. L.L. Thurstone, A law of comparative judgment. Psychol. Rev. 34, 273–286 (1927)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. T. Kamishima, Nantonac collaborative filtering: Recommendation based on order responses, in Proceedings of The 9th International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2003), pp. 583–588

    Google Scholar 

  23. T. Kamishima, J. Fujiki, Clustering orders, in Proceedings of The 6th International Conference on Discovery Science (2003), pp. 194–207 [LNAI 2843]

    Google Scholar 

  24. T. Kamishima, S. Akaho, Efficient clustering for orders, in Mining Complex Data, vol. 165, Studies in Computational Intelligence, ed. by D.A. Zighed, S. Tsumoto, Z.W. Ras, H. Hacid (Springer, 2009), pp. 261–280

    Google Scholar 

  25. D.E. Critchlow, M.A. Fligner, J.S. Verducci, Probability models on rankings. J. Math. Psychol. 35, 294–318 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. F. Mosteller, Remarks on the method of paired comparisons: I – the least squares solution assuming equal standard deviations and equal correlations. Psychometrika 16(1), 3–9 (1951)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. B. Babington Smith, Discussion on professor ross’s paper. J. Royal Stat. Soc. B 12, 53–56 (1950) (A.S.C. Ross, “Philological Probability Problems”, pp. 19–41)

    Google Scholar 

  28. R.A. Bradley, M.E. Terry, Rank analysis of incomplete block designs – i. The method of paired comparisons. Biometrika 39, 324–345 (1952)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. C.L. Mallows, Non-null ranking models, I. Biometrika 44, 114–130 (1957)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. R.L. Plackett, The analysis of permutations. J. Royal Stat. Soc. C 24(2), 193–202 (1975)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

A part of this work is supported by the grant-in-aid 14658106 and 16700157 of the Japan society for the promotion of science. Thanks are due to the Mainichi Newspapers for permission to use the articles.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshihiro Kamishima .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kamishima, T., Kazawa, H., Akaho, S. (2010). A Survey and Empirical Comparison of Object Ranking Methods. In: Fürnkranz, J., Hüllermeier, E. (eds) Preference Learning. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14125-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14125-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14124-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14125-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics