Skip to main content

Evolving Pattern of Intra-industry Trade Specialization of the New Member States of the EU: The Case of the Automotive Industry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Five Years of an Enlarged EU

Abstract

The paper investigates the development of intra-industry trade of the new Member States with major partners between 2000 and 2007. Intra-industry trade is separated into horizontal and vertical components on the basis of differences in unit values. We have found that although inter-industry trade still accounts for almost 50% of the trade of the countries that joined the EU in 2004, its share has been declining to the benefit of intra-industry trade (except for Malta). Intra-industry trade accelerated in the post-accession period and in 2007 Slovenia and the Czech Republic recorded the highest shares. Intra-industry trade of the new Member States has been dominated by the vertical component, usually low-quality goods. However, in almost all new Member States, the share of high-quality vertical intra-industry trade, as well as the horizontal component increased. Thus, the pattern of trade specialization in the new Member States has improved. Growing shares of intra-industry trade, particularly the horizontal component, reflect increasing similarities between new and old Member States and a favourable convergence process between the two groups of countries. In the automotive sector, intra-industry trade is generally larger than in total trade, meaning deeper specialization. This phenomenon can be largely attributed to the high volume of foreign direct investment in the sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The average exports of the EU-10 countries in the period 2000–2003 developed at 15.2% per year while in the after-accession period (2004–2007) at 19.4%. The respective average rates of growth of exports from the EU-15 amounted to 5.7 and 7.8%, respectively.

  2. 2.

    The Grubel-Lloyd index is useful for comparisons across products and over time, but it can overstate the size of IIT trade and can mask different levels of IIT within a given group of products. (see: European Competitiveness Report 2004. Commission Staff Working Document SEC(2004) 1397. European Commission. Brussels. 2004, p. 91).

  3. 3.

    Austria, the Netherlands, Germany, Italy and Sweden.

  4. 4.

    Taking into account that FDI flows towards the new Member States are dominated by financial services, the FDI impact on trade is lower than it might result from the size of total FDI flows. In this study we take into account only FDI in manufacturing sector.

  5. 5.

    Automotive goods are relatively important also in industrial trade of Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia but the share of FDI in automotive sectors is here relatively low.

  6. 6.

    In the first half of 2008, around 94% of cars produced in Poland were exported. At the same time, almost all cars sold on the Polish market were of foreign origin, a big part of them being used cars (about 40% in 2002–2003).

References

  • Abd-el-Rahman, K. (1991). Firms’ competitive and national comparative advantages as joint determinants of trade composition. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 127(1), 87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aturupane, C., Djankov, S., & Hoekman, B. (1999). Horizontal and vertical intra-industry trade between eastern Europe and the European Union. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 135(1), 62–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balassa, B. (1966). Tariff reductions and trade in manufactures among industrial countries. American Economic Review, 56(3), 466–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Černoša, S. (2007). Horizontal and vertical intra-industry trade between the former CEFTA countries and the European Union. Managing Global Transitions, 5(2), 157–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cieślik, A. (2008). Multinational firms and international fragmentation of production in Poland. Working Papers of International Business, Sopot: University of Gdańsk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarny, E., & Śledziewska, K. (2008). Poland’s intra-industry trade with the European Union at the beginning of the 21th century. In M. A. Weresa (Ed.), Poland. Competitiveness report. Focus on services. Warszawa: World Economy Research Institute, Warsaw School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Simone, G. (2007, May). Trade in parts and components and central eastern European countries’ industrial geography. Department of Economics, University of Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falvey, R. (1981). Commercial policy and intra-industry trade. Journal of International Economics, 11(4), 495–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falvey, R., & Kierzkowski, H. (1987). Product quality, intra-industry trade and (im)perfect competition. In H. Kierzkowski (Ed.), Protection and competition in international trade. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferto, I., & Soos, K. A. (2006, February). The development of intra-industry trade between the European Union and European former communist countries before the 2004 enlargement. INDEUNIS Papers, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fidrmuc, J., Grozea-Helmenstein, D., & Wörgötter, A. (1997, December). Intra-industry trade dynamics in the east-west relations. Comparison of Austrian, Dutch, German, Italian and Swedish trade with the CEEC. East European Series, No. 52, Vienna: Institute for Advanced Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finger, J. M. (1975). Trade overlap and intra-industry trade. Economic Inquiry, 13, 581–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flam, H., & Helpman, E. (1987). Vertical product differentiation and north-south trade. American Economic Review, 76(5), 810–822.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gacs, J. (1994). The economic interpenetration between the EC and eastern Europe: Hungary. European Economy, 6, 191–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenaway, D., Hine, R. C., & Milner, C. (1994). Country-specific factors and pattern of horizontal and vertical intra-industry trade in the UK. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 130, 77–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grubel, H. G., & Lloyd, P. J. (1975). Intra-industry trade: The theory and measurement of intra-industry trade in differentiated products. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E. (1981). International trade in the presence of product differentiation, economies of scale and monopolistic competition: A Chamberlin-Heckscher-Ohlin approach. Journal of International Economics, 11(3), 305–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E., & Krugman, P. (1985). Market structure and foreign trade. Brighton: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hine, R. C., Greenaway, D., & Milner, Ch. (1998). Vertical and horizontal intra-industry trade: An analysis of country- and industry-specific determinants. In M. Brülhart & R. C. Hine (Eds.), Intra-industry trade and adjustment. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaminski, B. (2001, April). How accession to the European Union has affected external trade and foreign direct investment in central European countries. Policy Research Working Paper, No. 2578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. R. (1979). Increasing returns, monopolistic competition and international trade. Journal of International Economics, 9, 469–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. R. (1980). Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade. American Economic Review, 70(5), 950–959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, K. (1980). Intra-industry trade under perfect monopolistic competition. Journal of International Economics, 10(2), 151–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loertscher, R., & Wolter, F. (1980). Determinants of intra-industry trade: Among countries and across industries. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 116, 280–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Przystupa, J. (Ed.). (2006). Economy and foreign trade of Poland in 2006. Warsaw: Institute for Market, Consumption and Business Cycles Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruffin, R. J. (1999). The nature and significance of intra-industry trade. Economic and Financial Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Fourth Quarter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirpak, M. (2006, November). The automobile industry in central Europe. Washington DC: IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdoorn, P. J. (1960). The intra-block trade of Benelux. In E. A. G. Robinson (Ed.), Economic consequences of the size of nations. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to thank Prof. Elżbieta Czarny for helpful comments. Data has been compiled by Łukasz Ambroziak and Maciej Sewerski, who produced the tables and figures.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elżbieta Kawecka-Wyrzykowska .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kawecka-Wyrzykowska, E. (2010). Evolving Pattern of Intra-industry Trade Specialization of the New Member States of the EU: The Case of the Automotive Industry. In: Keereman, F., Szekely, I. (eds) Five Years of an Enlarged EU. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12516-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12516-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12515-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12516-4

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics