Abstract
The subject of this chapter is the common representational format. Conversion of all sensor observations to a common format is a basic requirement for image fusion. The reason for this is that only after conversion to a common format are the input images compatible, i. e. the input images “speak a common language” and image fusion may be performed. In this chapter we shall consider the principal theories and techniques which underlie the concept of a common representational format.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ahonen, T.: Face and texture image analysis with quantized filter response statistics. PhD thesis, University of Oulu, Finland (2009)
Ahonen, T., Hadid, A., Pietikainen, M.: Face description with local binary patterns: Application to face recognition. IEEE Trans Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 28, 2037–2041 (2006)
Behloul, F., Lelieveldt, B.P.E., Boudraa, A., Janier, M., Revel, D., Reiber, J.H.C.: Neuro-fuzzy systems for computer-aided myocardial viability assessment. IEEE Trans. Medical Imag. 20, 1302–1313 (2001)
Belongie, S., Malik, J., Puzicha, J.: Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts. IEEE Trans Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 24, 509–522 (2002)
Gevers, T., Smeulders, A.W.M.: Color-based object recognition. Patt. Recogn. 32, 453–464 (1999)
Gevers, T., Stockman, H.M.G.: Robust photometric invariant region detection in multi-spectral images. Int. J. Comp. Vis. 53, 135–151 (2003)
Jolliffe, I.T.: Principal Component Analysis, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Ling, H., Jacobs, D.: Shape classification using the inner-distance. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 29, 286–299 (2007)
Lowe, D.G.: Distinctive image features from scale-invariant key-points. Int. J. Comp. Vis. 60, 91–100 (2004)
Ojala, T., Pietikainen, M., Harwood, D.: A comparative study of texture measures with classification based on feature distributions. Patt. Recogn. 29, 51–59 (1999)
Ojala, T., Pietikainen, M., Maenpaa, T.: Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 24, 971–987 (2002)
Mikolajczek, K., Schmid, C.: A performance evaluation of local descriptors. IEEE Trans Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 27, 1615–1630 (2005)
Schlei, B.R.: A new computational framework for 2D shape-enclosing contours. Image Vis. Comp. 27, 637–647 (2009)
Thompson, P.M., Mega, M.S., Narr, K.L., Sowell, E.R., Blanton, R.E., Toga, A.W.: Brain image analysis and atlas construction. In: Handbook of Medical Imaging, Washington, USA, vol. 2. SPIE Press, Bellington
Valera Espina, M., Velastin, S.A.: Intelligent distributed surveillance systems: a review. IEE Proc. Vis. Image Sig. Process. 152, 192–204 (2005)
Verboven, S., Hubert, M.: Libra: A matlab library for robust analysis. Chemometrics and Intell. Laboratory Syst. 75, 127–136 (2005)
van de Weijer, J., Gevers, T., Smeulders, A.W.M.: Robust photometric invariant features from the color tensor. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 15, 118–127 (2006)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mitchell, H.B. (2010). Common Representational Format. In: Image Fusion. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11216-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11216-4_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-11215-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-11216-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)