Skip to main content

LTL Path Checking Is Efficiently Parallelizable

  • Conference paper
Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 5556))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We present an AC 1(logDCFL) algorithm for checking LTL formulas over finite paths, thus establishing that the problem can be efficiently parallelized. Our construction provides a foundation for the parallelization of various applications in monitoring, testing, and verification.

This work was partly supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) as part of the Transregional Collaborative Research Center “Automatic Verification and Analysis of Complex Systems” (SFB/TR 14 AVACS).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Armoni, R., Korchemny, D., Tiemeyer, A., Vardi, M.Y., Zbar, Y.: Deterministic Dynamic Monitors for Linear-Time Assertions. In: Havelund, K., Núñez, M., Roşu, G., Wolff, B. (eds.) FATES 2006 and RV 2006. LNCS, vol. 4262, pp. 163–177. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Artho, C., Barringer, H., Goldberg, A., Havelund, K., Khurshid, S., Lowry, M., Pasareanu, C., Rosu, G., Sen, K., Visser, W., Washington, R.: Combining test case generation and runtime verification. Theoretical Computer Science 336(2-3), 209–234 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Barrington, D.A.M., Lu, C.-J., Miltersen, P.B., Skyum, S.: On monotone planar circuits. In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (COCO 1999), Washington, DC, USA, pp. 24–31. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boule, M., Zilic, Z.: Automata-based assertion-checker synthesis of PSL properties. ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems (TODAES) 13(1) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chakraborty, T., Datta, S.: One-input-face MPCVP is hard for L, but in LogDCFL. In: Arun-Kumar, S., Garg, N. (eds.) FSTTCS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4337, pp. 57–68. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Dahan, A., Geist, D., Gluhovsky, L., Pidan, D., Shapir, G., Wolfsthal, Y., Benalycherif, L., Kamdem, R., Lahbib, Y.: Combining system level modeling with assertion based verification. In: ISQED 2005: Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Quality of Electronic Design, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 310–315. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Delcher, A.L., Kosaraju, S.R.: An NC algorithm for evaluating monotone planar circuits. SIAM J. Comput. 24(2), 369–375 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Demri, S., Schnoebelen, P.: The complexity of propositional linear temporal logics in simple cases. Inf. Comput. 174(1), 84–103 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Dymond, P.W., Cook, S.A.: Complexity theory of parallel time and hardware. Information and Computation 80(3), 205–226 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Finkbeiner, B., Sipma, H.B.: Checking finite traces using alternating automata. Formal Methods in System Design 24, 101–127 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldschlager, L.M.: A space efficient algorithm for the monotone planar circuit value problem. Inf. Process. Lett. 10(1), 25–27 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Havelund, K., Roşu, G.: Efficient monitoring of safety properties. Software Tools for Technology Transfer (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. IEEE Std 1850-2007. Standard for Property Specification Language (PSL). IEEE, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jiang, T., Ravikumar, B.: A note on the space complexity of some decision problems for finite automata. Information Processing Letters 40, 25–31 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Rao Kosaraju, S.: On parallel evaluation of classes of circuits. In: Veni Madhavan, C.E., Nori, K.V. (eds.) FSTTCS 1990. LNCS, vol. 472, pp. 232–237. Springer, Heidelberg (1990)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Lichtenstein, O., Pnueli, A., Zuck, L.D.: The glory of the past. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Logic of Programs, London, UK, pp. 196–218. Springer, London (1985)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Limaye, N., Mahajan, M., Sarma, J.M.N.: Evaluating monotone circuits on cylinders, planes and tori. In: Durand, B., Thomas, W. (eds.) STACS 2006. LNCS, vol. 3884, pp. 660–671. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Markey, N., Schnoebelen, P.: Model checking a path (preliminary report). In: Amadio, R.M., Lugiez, D. (eds.) CONCUR 2003. LNCS, vol. 2761, pp. 251–265. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Petersen, H.: Decision problems for generalized regular expressions. In: Proc. 2nd International Workshop on Descriptional Complexity of Automata, Grammars and Related Structures, London (Ontario), pp. 22–29 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Petersen, H.: The membership problem for regular expressions with intersection is complete in LOGCFL. In: Alt, H., Ferreira, A. (eds.) STACS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2285, pp. 513–522. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang, H.: An NC algorithm for the general planar monotone circuit value problem. In: Proc. 3rd IEEE Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing, pp. 196–203 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Younes, H.L.S., Simmons, R.G.: Probabilistic Verification of Discrete Event Systems Using Acceptance Sampling. In: Brinksma, E., Larsen, K.G. (eds.) CAV 2002. LNCS, vol. 2404, p. 223. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kuhtz, L., Finkbeiner, B. (2009). LTL Path Checking Is Efficiently Parallelizable. In: Albers, S., Marchetti-Spaccamela, A., Matias, Y., Nikoletseas, S., Thomas, W. (eds) Automata, Languages and Programming. ICALP 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5556. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02930-1_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02930-1_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02929-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02930-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics