Skip to main content

A Refinement Operator Based Learning Algorithm for the \(\mathcal{ALC}\) Description Logic

  • Conference paper
Inductive Logic Programming (ILP 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4894))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

With the advent of the Semantic Web, description logics have become one of the most prominent paradigms for knowledge representation and reasoning. Progress in research and applications, however, faces a bottleneck due to the lack of available knowledge bases, and it is paramount that suitable automated methods for their acquisition will be developed. In this paper, we provide the first learning algorithm based on refinement operators for the most fundamental description logic \(\mathcal{ALC}\). We develop the algorithm from thorough theoretical foundations and report on a prototype implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D.L., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Badea, L., Nienhuys-Cheng, S.-H.: A refinement operator for description logics. In: Cussens, J., Frisch, A.M. (eds.) ILP 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1866, pp. 40–59. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Blumer, A., Ehrenfeucht, A., Haussler, D., Warmuth, M.K.: Occam’s razor. In: Shavlik, J.W., Dietterich, T.G. (eds.) Readings in Machine Learning, pp. 201–204. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen, W.W., Borgida, A., Hirsh, H.: Computing least common subsumers in description logics. In: Proceedings of the Tenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 754–760. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen, W.W., Hirsh, H.: Learning the CLASSIC description logic: Theoretical and experimental results. In: Doyle, J., Sandewall, E., Torasso, P. (eds.) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, may 1994, pp. 121–133. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Esposito, F., Fanizzi, N., Iannone, L., Palmisano, I., Semeraro, G.: Knowledge-intensive induction of terminologies from metadata. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 441–455. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fanizzi, N., Iannone, L., Palmisano, I., Semeraro, G.: Concept formation in expressive description logics. In: ECML 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3201, Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Iannone, L., Palmisano, I.: An algorithm based on counterfactuals for concept learning in the semantic web. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Industrial and Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems, Bari, Italy, June 2005, pp. 370–379 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lehmann, J., Hitzler, P.: A refinement operator based learning algorithm for the \(\mathcal{ALC}\) description logic. In: Blockeel, H., Ramon, J., Shavlik, J., Tadepalli, P. (eds.) ILP 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4894, pp. 147–160. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lehmann, J., Hitzler, P.: A refinement operator based learning algorithm for the \(\mathcal{ALC}\) description logic. In: Technical report, University of Leipzig (2007), http://www.jens-lehmann.org

  11. Lisi, F.A., Malerba, D.: Ideal refinement of descriptions in AL-log. In: Horváth, T., Yamamoto, A. (eds.) ILP 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2835, pp. 215–232. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Michalski, R.S.: Pattern recognition as rule-guided inductive inference. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2(4), 349–361 (1980)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Nienhuys-Cheng, S.-H., de Wolf, R. (eds.): Foundations of Inductive Logic Programming. LNCS. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Winston, P.: Learning structural descriptions from examples. In: Winston, P. (ed.) The Psychology of Computer Vision, pp. 157–209. McGraw-Hill, New York (1975)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Hendrik Blockeel Jan Ramon Jude Shavlik Prasad Tadepalli

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lehmann, J., Hitzler, P. (2008). A Refinement Operator Based Learning Algorithm for the \(\mathcal{ALC}\) Description Logic. In: Blockeel, H., Ramon, J., Shavlik, J., Tadepalli, P. (eds) Inductive Logic Programming. ILP 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4894. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78469-2_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78469-2_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-78468-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-78469-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics