Skip to main content

The Geometry of the South Leading Carpathian Thrust Line and the Moesia Boundary: The Role of Inherited Structures in Establishing a Transcurent Contact on the Concave Side of the Carpathians

  • Conference paper
Thrust Belts and Foreland Basins

Part of the book series: Frontiers in Earth Sciences ((FRONTIERS))

  • 3040 Accesses

Abstract

The NW-most corner of Moesia offers the possibility to unravel the structural architecture as well as the kinematic characteristics of a highly-bent contact between an orogenic nappe pile and its foreland plate. The major fault system, dominantly transcurent that accommodated during the Tertiary the displacement and rotation of the Latest Cretaceous Carpathian orogenic wedge around the Moesian corner had originated from a passive margin stage when W-E to WNWESE extensional faulting predated the formation of the Late Jurassic Severin oceanic crust. In the NW-most Moesia, these old structures are cut by an E-W-trending major normal fault system which accommodated the Late Oligocene (?) - Burdigalian dextral movements of the Carpathian units along the Timok lineament. Structural evidence shows that this initially rather straight N-S dextral transfer fault evolved into a curved anastomozed system parallel to the present-day shape of the orogen not earlier than the Middle Miocene. This was at the time when the Carpathian units commenced to rotate around the Moesian corner along the original Timok and one of the major E-W-trending normal faults. Farther ENE- to E-wards displacement of the Carpathian units along the northern margin of the Moesian plate induced an oblique inversion of the Mid-Tertiary extensional basin by peeling-off E-SE-wards its sedimentary fill. Overall, the inversion created a duplex-style system that changes E-wards to a major plan-view wedge bounded by a NW-SE dextral tear fault passing gradually to the thin-skinned Subcarpathian nappe. In this contribution we stress the role of inherited structural weaknesses within the foreland plate in the creation of a transcurent contact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Berza T, Draganescu A (1988) The Cerna-Jiu fault system (South Carpathians, Romania), a major Tertiary transcurent lineament. DSS Inst. Geol. Geofiz. 72–73: 43–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Csontos L, Voros A (2004) Mesozoic plate tectonic reconstruction of the Carpathian region. Paleogeogr. Paleoclim. Paleoecol. 210: 1–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dicea O (1995) The structure and hydrocarbon geology of the Romanian East Carpathians border from seismic data. Petrol. Geosci. 1: 135–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Doglioni C, Busatta C, Bolis G, Marianini L, Zanella M (1996) Structural evolution of the eastern Balkans (Bulgaria). Marine Petrol. Geol. 13: 225–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fugenschuh B, Schmid S (2005) Age and significance of core complex formation in a very curved orogen: evidence from fission track studies in the South Carpathians (Romania). Tectonophysics 404: 33–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hippolyte J-C, Badescu D, Constantin P (1999) Evolution of the transport direction of the Carpathian belt during its collision with the east European platform. Tectonics 18: 1120–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huismans R, Bertotti G, Ciulavu D, Sanders CAE, Cloetingh S, Dinu C (1997) Structural evolution of the Transylvanian Basin (Romania): a sedimentary basin in the bend zone of the Carpathians. Tectonophysics 272: 249–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iancu V, Berza T, Seghedi A, Gheuca I, Hann H-P (2005) Alpine polyphase tectono-metamorphic evolution of the South Carpathians: a new overview. Tectonophysics 410: 337–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matenco L (1997) Tectonic evolution of the Outer Romanian Carpathians: constraints from kinematic analysis and flexural modeling. Ph.D. thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 160p

    Google Scholar 

  • Matenco L, Schmid S (1999) Exumation of the Danubian nappes system (South Carpathians) during the early Tertiary: inferences from kinematic and paleostress analysis at the Getic/Danubian nappes contact. Tectonophysics 314: 401–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matenco L, Bertotti G, Dinu C, Cloetingh S (1997) Tertiary tectonic evolution of the external South Carpathians and the adjacent Moesian platform (Romania). Tectonics 16: 896–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matresu J, Dinu C (2004) Paleozoic extensional basins in the western part of the Moesian platform. In: Dinu C, Mocanu V (eds) Geology, tectonics and hydrocarbon potential of the Romanian Moesian platform. BGF special volume 3, pp 63–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Motas C (1981) Nouvelles donnees sur les rapports structuraux entre les Carpathes Meridionales et la Depression Getique. (Proceedings of the 12th Congress of the Carpathian-Balkan Geological Association, Bucharest, Romania)

    Google Scholar 

  • Paraschiv D (1979) The Moesian platform and its hydrocarbon fields (in Romanian with summary in English). Romanian Academy, Bucharest, 196p

    Google Scholar 

  • Paraschiv D (1997) The pre-Parathethys buried denudational surface in Romanian territory. Rev. Roumaine Geograph. 41: 21–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Paraschiv D, Baltes N (1983) The relathionship between phytometamorphism and the oil and gas-bearing potential of the Bibesti-Bulbuceni area (in Romanian with summary in English). St. Cerc. Geol. Geofiz. Geograf., Serie Geol. 28: 54–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindell JL (1991) Geologic rationale for hydrocarbon exploration in the Caribbean and adjacent regions. J. Petrol. Geol. 14: 237–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Popescu BM (1995) Romania’s petroleum systems and their remaining potential. Petrol. Geosci. 1: 337–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabagia T, Matenco L (1999) Tertiary tectonic and sedimentological evolution of the South Carpathians foredeep: tectonic versus eustatic control. Marine Petrol. Geol. 16: 719–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabagia T, Tarapoanca M (1999) Tectonic evolution of the Romanian part of the Moesian platform: an integrated model. In: Matenco L, Ioane D, Seghedi A (eds) Dobrogea — the interface between the Carpathians and the Trans-European Suture Zone. Europrobe TESZ/PANCARDI/GeoRift Abs. Vol., Romanian J. of Tectonics and Reg. Geol. 7 suppl. 1, p. 58

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratschbacher L, Linzer HG, Moser F, Strusievicz RO, Bedelean H, Har N, Mogos PA (1993) Cretaceous to Miocene thrusting and wrenching along the central South Carpathians due to a cornel effect during collision and orocline formation. Tectonics 12: 855–873

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosu V (2005) The contribution of the Tertiary tectonic events to the geological structure and formation of hydrocarbon fields in Getic Depression, the sector between Olt and Jiu valleys (in Romanian). Ph.D. thesis, Bucharest University, 240p

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandulescu M (1984) Geotectonics of Romania (in Romanian). Tehnica, Bucharest, 450p

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandulescu M (1988) Cenozoic tectonic history of the Carpathians. In: Royden LH, Horvath F (eds) The Pannonian basin. A study in basin evolution. AAPG Memoir 45, pp 17–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid S, Berza T, Diaconescu V, Froitzheim N, Fugenschuh B (1998) Orogen parallel extension in the Southern Carpathians. Tectonophysics 297: 209–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarapoanca M (2004) Architecture, 3D geometry and tectonic evolution of the Carpathians foreland basin. Ph.D. thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 120p

    Google Scholar 

  • Tari G (2005) The divergent continental margins of the Jurassic proto-Pannonian Basin: implications for the petroleum systems of the Vienna Basin and the Moesian Platform. In: Transactions GCSSEPM Foundation 25th Annual Res. Conf., pp 955–986

    Google Scholar 

  • Tari G, Dicea O, Faulkerson J, Georgiev G, Popov S, Stefanescu M, Weir G (1997) Cimmerian and Alpine stratigraphy and structural evolution of the Moesian platform (Romania/Bulgaria). In: Robinson AG (ed) Regional and petroleum geology of the Black Sea and surrounding regions. AAPG Memoir 68, pp 63–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Wijk JW, Cloetingh SAPL (2002) Basin migration caused by slow lithospheric extension. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 198: 275–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willingshofer E, Andriessen P, Cloetingh S, Neubauer F (2001) Detrital fission track thermochronology of Upper Cretaceous syn-orogenic sediments in the South Carpathians (Romania): inference on the tectonic evolution of a collisional hinterland. Basin Res. 13: 379–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tarapoanca, M., Tambrea, D., Avram, V., Popescu, B. (2007). The Geometry of the South Leading Carpathian Thrust Line and the Moesia Boundary: The Role of Inherited Structures in Establishing a Transcurent Contact on the Concave Side of the Carpathians. In: Lacombe, O., Roure, F., Lavé, J., Vergés, J. (eds) Thrust Belts and Foreland Basins. Frontiers in Earth Sciences. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69426-7_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics