Skip to main content

Risk-Taking in Advertising Agencies: A Stakeholder Perspective

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 1999 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference

Abstract

The stakes are high for both advertiser and agency with rewards and penalties that accompany taking risks in advertising. Perceptions of advertising risk will likely differ from an advertiser's or agency's perspective. To date, advertisers have been the focus of advertising risk studies. The indications are that advertising manager's view risktaking as context-specific given the company's internal and external situation. This paper examines the attitudes of advertising agencies towards advertising risk-taking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Basu, Amiya K., Rajiv Lal, V. Srinivasan and Richard Staelin. “Salesforce Compensation Plans: An Agency Theoretic Framework.” Marketing Science 4, Fall (1985): 267-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, M.H. “An Empirical Investigation of Advertising Wearin and Wearout.” Journal of Advertising Research 28, 6 (1988): 45-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, S. and M. Lubatkin. “Corporate Mergers, Stockholder Diversification, and Changes in Systematic Risk.” Strategic Management Journal!! (1990): 255-69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt. Kathleen M. “Agency Theory: an Assessment and Review.” Academy of Management Review" 14, 1 (1989): 57-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E.F. “Agency Problems and the Theory ofthe Firm.” Journal of Political Economics 88, 2, (1980): 288-307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, Daniel. and Amos Tversky. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk.” Econometrica 47, 2 (1979): 263-89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D.Y. “The Impact of Firms' Risk Taking in Attitudes on Advertising Budgets.” Journal of Business Research 31, 1-2 (1994): 247-56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michell, P.C.N., and H. Cataquet. “Establishing the Causes of Disaffection in Agency-Client Relations.” Journal of Advertising Research 32,2 (1992): 41-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter, John R., and Larry Percy. Advertising Communications & Promotion Management. New York: McGrawHill, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackman, Daniel B., C. T. Salmon and C. Salmon. “Developing an Advertising Agency-Client Relationship.” Journal of Advertising Research 26,6 (1986/1987): 21-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, Douglas C., and Pierre Berthon. “Antecedents of Risk Taking Behavior By Advertisers: Empirical Evidence and Management Implications.” Journal of Advertising Research 37, 5 (1997): 27-40.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Academy of Marketing Science

About this paper

Cite this paper

West, D.C., Miciak, A.R. (2015). Risk-Taking in Advertising Agencies: A Stakeholder Perspective. In: Noble, C. (eds) Proceedings of the 1999 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13078-1_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics