Abstract
In the aftermath of the financial crisis, policymakers at both global and national levels have begun to implement a range of regulatory measures designed to address systemic risk more consistently. One of the key elements of this has been a framework to contain the moral hazard and the negative externalities related to systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs). Regulators are seeking to make these institutions more resilient and to avoid future defaults. Another line of defense in this context is a more efficient restructuring and resolution regime. Against this backdrop, there has been increased interest on the part of policymakers in quantitative indicators measuring systemic importance. Based on indicator categories proposed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) we illustrate how, in principle, a set of indicators like this can be used to monitor the development of banks’ systemic importance over time. Overall, the set of indicators suggests that the systemic importance of large German banks has declined somewhat over the last 4 years. This finding appears to be driven mostly, however, by factors other than new policies directly addressing the too-important-to-fail-problem, chiefly the difficult economic environment. Therefore, it is still too early for a final judgment on the effectiveness of such policies. Given that credit rating-based measures of systemic government support suggest that large German banks are still benefitting from a substantial public subsidy, it may be necessary to consider additional policy measures over the medium term.
The views expressed in the paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Deutsche Bundesbank or its staff. Thilo Liebig is Head of the Macroprudential Analysis Division in the Financial Stability Department of the Deutsche Bundesbank and Sebastian Wider is a senior economist in the same division.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
As a paper by Völz and Wedow (2009) implies, it would have been possible – even before 2008 – to find evidence in CDS spreads suggesting that banks’ size distorted market prices.
- 2.
Source: Company Websites.
- 3.
For a deeper analysis see, for example, DĂĽllmann and Puzanova (2011). They find some empirical evidence that size alone is not a reliable proxy for the systemic importance of a bank.
- 4.
See Buch et al. (2010) for empirical evidence that this can be a mixed blessing for the banks themselves.
References
BCBS (2011) Global systemically important banks: assessment methodology and the additional loss absorbency requirement. http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs207.pdf and http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs255.pdf. Accessed 29 Aug 2013
Bloomberg (2011) German Bank subordinated debt downgraded by Moody’s on regulation concern, 18 Feb 2011. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-02-17/german-bank-debt-securities-totaling-33-billion-cut-by-moody-s-on-risks.html. Accessed 29 Aug 2013
Buch CM, et al (2010) Do banks benefit from internationalization? Revisiting the market power-risk nexus. Deutsche Bundesbank discussion paper, series 2: banking and financial studies, no 09/2010
Bundesfinanzministerium (2013) German government approves draft bank-separation law and new criminal-law provisions for the financial sector, 6 Feb 2013. http://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Content/EN/Pressemitteilungen/2013/2013-02-06-german-government-approves-draft-bank-separation-law.html. Accessed 29 Aug 2013
Dam L, Koetter M (2011) Bank bailouts, interventions, and moral hazard. Deutsche Bundesbank discussion paper, series 2: banking and financial studies, no 10/2011
Deutsche Bundesbank (2011) Fundamental features of the German Bank Restructuring Act, Monthly Report, June 2011
Deutsche Bundesbank (2012) The German banking system five years into the financial crisis, Financial Stability Review, Nov 2012, p 37. http://www.bundesbank.de/Redaktion/EN/Downloads/Publications/Financial_Stability_Review/2012_financial_stability_review_print.pdf?__blob=publicationFile. Accessed 29 Aug 2013
Deutscher Bundestag (2008) Gesetzentwurf der Fraktionen der CDU/CSU und SPD: Finanzmarktstabilisierungsgesetz (FMStG), Drucksache 16/10600, 14 Oct 2008, p 9. http://dip21.bundestag.de/dip21/btd/16/106/1610600.pdf. Accessed 29 Aug 2013
DĂĽllmann K, Puzanova N (2011) Systemic risk contributions: a credit portfolio approach. Deutsche Bundesbank discussion paper, series 2: banking and financial studies, no 08/2011
FSB (2011a) Key attributes of effective resolution regimes for financial institutions, Oct 2011. http://www.financialstabilityboard.org/publications/r_111104cc.pdf. Accessed 29 Aug 2013
FSB (2011b) Policy measures to address systemically important financial institutions http://www.financialstabilityboard.org/publications/r_111104bb.pdf. Accessed 29 Aug 2013
G20 (2009) Leaders’ statement the Pittsburgh Summit, 25 Sep 2009. http://www.g20.org/documents/final-communique.pdf. Accessed 29 Aug 2013
IMF/BIS/FSB (2009) Guidance to assess the systemic importance of financial institutions, markets and instruments: initial considerations, Oct 2009. www.financialstabilityboard.org/publications/r_091107c.pdf. Accessed 29 Aug 2013
Ueda K, Weder di Mauro B (2012) Quantifying structural subsidy values for systemically important financial institutions, IMF working paper no 12/128
Völz M, Wedow M (2009) Does banks’ size distort market prices? Evidence for too-big-to-fail in the CDS market. Deutsche Bundesbank discussion paper, series 2: banking and financial studies, no 06/2009
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Liebig, T., Wider, S. (2013). SIFIs in the Cross Sea: How Are Large German Banks Adjusting to a Rough Economic Environment and a New Regulatory Setting?. In: Maltritz, D., Berlemann, M. (eds) Financial Crises, Sovereign Risk and the Role of Institutions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03104-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03104-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-03103-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-03104-0
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)