Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Light Pollution Reduction

Methods to Reduce the Environmental Impact of Artificial Light at Night

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Advanced Lighting Technology

Abstract

Artificial light at night is an irreplaceable technology for our society and its activities at nighttime. But this indispensable tool has detrimental side effects, which have only come to light in the past 10–20 years. This chapter reviews ways to implement technology in order to lower the impact of artificial light at night on nature and humans. Further, it provides guidelines for environmental protection and scientific approaches to reduce the increase in light pollution and discusses the urgent need for further research.

Measures to prevent obtrusive light and unintentional trespass into homes and natural habitats are mostly simple solutions like shielding luminaires and predominantly require awareness. Shades are another effective tool to reduce trespass from interior lights. Especially in greenhouses, the use of shades significantly reduces the contribution to skyglow. Artificial light should be switched off whenever it is not needed. Smart, flexible lighting systems can help to use artificial light with precision. The choice of the appropriate illumination has to be balanced by the needs for optimal visibility, human well-being, environmental conservation and protection of the night sky. For visibility, conditions comparable to bright moonlit nights (0.3 lx) are sufficient. Low-level streetlights that produce only 1–3 lx at the surface meet the requirement of facial cognition. Although this light level might be too low for road safety, a consideration of maximum illumination levels in street lighting is recommended. The spectral power distribution of illuminants can impact several environmental parameters. For example, illuminants emitting short wavelengths can suppress melatonin in higher vertebrates (including humans), are attracting many insect species, and contribute in skyglow above average. Recent findings in different measures for energy efficiency of illuminants at scotopic or mesopic vision conditions compared to photopic conditions indicate that the assessment of lighting products needs fundamental revision. Further research is crucially needed to create refuges for light-sensitive species at night, to measure the impact of artificial light on nature, and also to monitor the improvements of light pollution-reducing measures.

Decrees in various regions have helped to lower the impact of artificial light at night significantly. Measures to reduce the impact of artificial light at night need to be carefully balanced with the surrounding environment. Thoughtful guidelines are crucial to reducing the rapid increase in sky brightness worldwide. These guidelines need to be made accessible for decision makers especially in areas which require new light installations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Albright LD, Both AJ, Chiu AJ (2000) Controlling greenhouse light to a consistent daily integral. Trans ASAE 43(2):421–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aubé M, Roby J, Kocifaj M (2013) Evaluating potential spectral impacts of various artificial lights on melatonin suppression, photosynthesis, and star visibility. PLoS One 8(7):e67798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aubrecht C, Stojan-Dolar M, De Sherbinin A, Jaiteh M, Longcore T, Elvidge C (2010) Lighting governance for protected areas and beyond–Identifying the urgent need for sustainable management of artificial light at night. Earthzine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benenson W, Harris WJ, Stocker H, Lutz H (2002) Handbook of physics. Springer, New York, p 376

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bisketzis N, Polymeropoulos G, Topalis FV (2004) A mesopic vision approach for a better design of road lighting. WSEAS Trans Circuits Syst 3(5):1380–1385

    Google Scholar 

  • Brainard GC, Rollag MD, Hanifin JP (1997) Photic regulation of melatonin in humans: ocular and neural signal transduction. J Biol Rhythms 12(6):537–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce-White C, Shardlow M (2011) A review of the impact of artificial light on invertebrates. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullough JD, Donnell ET, Rea MS (2013) To illuminate or not to illuminate: roadway lighting as it affects traffic safety at intersections. Accid Anal Prev 53:65–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cathey HM, Campbell LE (1975) Effectiveness of five vision-lighting sources on photo-regulation of 22 species of ornamental plants. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 100:65–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Cha JS, Lee JW, Lee WS, Jung JW, Le KM, Han JS, Gu JH (2014) Policy and status of light pollution management in Korea. Light Res Technol 46(1):78–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CIE (1997) Guidelines for minimizing sky glow. Publication No 126-1997. CIE, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • CIE (2004) Technical report: colorimetry, 3rd edn. Publication No 15-2004. CIE, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • CIE (2007) Technical report: road transport lighting in developing countries. Publication No 180-2007. CIE, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinzano P (2002) Technical measures for an effective limitation of the effects of light pollution. In: Cinzano P (ed) Light pollution and the protection of the night environment. Proceedings of the IDA regional meeting “Venice: let’s save the night”. ISTIL, Thiene, pp 193–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinzano P, Falchi F, Elvidg CD (2001) The first world atlas of the artificial night sky brightness. Mon Not R Astron Soc 328(3):689–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies TW, Bennie J, Gaston KJ (2012) Street lighting changes the composition of invertebrate communities. Biol Lett 8(5):764–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick R (2014) Applied scotobiology in luminaire design. Light Res Technol 46:50–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duriscoe DM, Luginbuhl CB, Elvidge CD (2014) The relation of outdoor lighting characteristics to sky glow from distant cities. Light Res Technol 46:35–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenbeis G, Hänel A (2009) Light pollution and the impact of artificial night lighting on insects. In: Eisenbeis G, Hänel A (eds) Ecology of cities and towns. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Books online http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609763.016

  • Elejoste P, Angulo I, Perallos A, Chertudi A, Zuazola IJG, Moreno A, Azpilicueta L, Astrain JJ, Falcone F, Villadangos J (2013) An easy to deploy street light control system based on wireless communication and LED technology. Sensors 13(5):6492–6523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elvik R (1995) Meta-analysis of evaluations of public lighting as accident countermeasure. In: Transportation research record no 1485. Transportation Research Board/National Research Council, Washington, DC, pp 112–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Falchi F (2011) Campaign of sky brightness and extinction measurements using a portable CCD camera. Mon Not R Astron Soc 412:33–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falchi F, Cinzano P, Elvidge CD, Keith DM, Haim A (2011) Limiting the impact of light pollution on human health, environment and stellar visibility. J Environ Manage 92(10):2714–2722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Davies TW, Bennie J, Hopkins J (2012) Reducing the ecological consequences of night-time light pollution: options and developments. J Appl Ecol 49(6):1256–1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gehring J, Kerlinger P, Manville AM II (2009) Communication towers, lights, and birds: successful methods of reducing the frequency of avian collisions. Ecol Appl 19:505–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He Y, Rea M, Bierman A, Bullough J (1997) Evaluating light source efficacy under mesopic conditions using reaction times. J Illum Eng Soc 26:125–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hölker F (2013) Lichtverschmutzung und die Folgen für Ökosysteme und Biodiversität. In: Held M, Hölker F, Jessel B (eds) Schutz der Nacht – Lichtverschmutzung, Biodiversität und Nachtlandschaft. BfN-Skripten 336, Bonn. pp 73–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölker F, Moss T, Griefahn B, Kloas W, Voigt CC, Henckel D, Hänel A, Kappeler PM, Völker S, Schwope A, Franke S, Uhrlandt D, Fischer J, Klenke R, Wolter C, Tockner K (2010a) The dark side of light – a transdisciplinary research agenda for light pollution policy. Ecol Soc 15(4), 13

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölker F, Wolter C, Perkin EK, Tockner K (2010b) Light pollution as a biodiversity threat. Trends Ecol Evol 25:681–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IDA/IESNA (2011) Model Lighting Ordinance (MLO) with users guide. http://www.darksky.org/outdoorlighting/mlo

  • ILE (2005) Guidance notes for the reduction of obtrusive light. http://www.britastro.org/dark-skies/pdfs/ile.pdf

  • ILP (2011) Guidance for the reduction of obtrusive light, GN01. https://www.theilp.org.uk/documents/obtrusive-light/

  • Jackett M, Frith W (2013) Quantifying the impact of road lighting on road safety – A New Zealand Study. IATSS Res 36:139–145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2012.09.001

  • Juntunen E, Tetri E, Tapaninen O, Yrjänä S, Kondratyev V, Sitomaniemi A, Siirtola H, Sarjanoja EM, Aikio J, Heikkinen V (2013) A smart LED luminaire for energy savings in pedestrian road lighting. Light Res Technol. DOI: 10.1177/1477153513510015

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayumov L, Casper RF, Hawa RJ, Perelman P, Chung SH, Sokalsky S, Shapiro CM (2005) Blocking low-wavelength light prevents nocturnal melatonin suppression with no adverse effect on performance during simulated shift work. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol 90(5):2755–2761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinteich A, Schneider JM (2011) Developmental strategies in an invasive spider: constraints and plasticity. Ecol Entomol 36(1):82–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuechly HU, Kyba CCM, Ruhtz T, Lindemann C, Wolter C, Fischer J, Hölker F (2012) Aerial survey and spatial analysis of sources of light pollution in Berlin, Germany. Remote Sens Environ 126:39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyba CCM, Hölker F (2013) Do artificially illuminated skies affect biodiversity in nocturnal landscapes? Landsc Ecol 28:1637–1640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyba CCM, Ruhtz T, Fischer J, Hölker F (2011) Cloud coverage acts as an amplifier for ecological light pollution in urban ecosystems. PLoS One 6(3):e17307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyba CCM, Ruhtz T, Fischer J, Hölker F (2012) Red is the new black: how the colour of urban skyglow varies with cloud cover. Mon Not R Astron Soc 425(1):701–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li XY, Zhang WQ (2013) Design of intelligent street light control system based on ZigBee. Appl Mech Mater 299:71–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longcore T, Rich C (2006) In: Synthesis Rich C, Longcore T (eds) Ecological consequences of artificial night lighting. Island Press, Washington, DC. pp 413–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Luginbuhl CB, Boley PA, Davis DR (2013) The impact of light source spectral power distribution on sky glow. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2013.12.004i

  • Marchant PR (2004) A demonstration that the claim that brighter lighting reduces crime is unfounded. Br J Criminol 44:441–447. http://bjc.oupjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/44/3/441

  • Marchant PR (2005) What works? A critical note on the evaluation of crime reduction initiatives. Crime Prev Community Saf Int J 7(2):7–13

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Marchant PR (2006) Shining a light on evidence based policy: street lighting and crime. Crim Justice Matters 62(1):18–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narisada K, Schreuder D (2004) Light pollution handbook, vol 322, Astrophysics and space science library. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • National Park Service (2012) Natural sounds and night skies. Managing Lightscapes. http://www.nature.nps.gov/night/management.cfm

  • Navara KJ, Nelson RJ (2007) The dark side of light at night: physiological, epidemiological, and ecological consequences. J Pineal Res 43:215–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parks B (2013) Ecological responsible outdoor lighting guidelines. In: Krop-Benesch A, Kyba CCM, Hölker F (eds) ALAN – first international conference on artificial light at night, Berlin, 28–30 Oct, p 95

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauen-Höppner U, Höppner M (2013) Öffentliche Beleuchtung – mehr Licht heißt nicht mehr Sicherheit. In: Held M, Hölker F, Jessel B (eds) Schutz der Nacht – Lichtverschmutzung, Biodiversität und Nachtlandschaft. BfN-Skripten 336, Bonn. pp 10–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkin EK, Hölker F, Richardson JS, Sadler JP, Wolter C, Tockner K (2011) The influence of artificial light on stream and riparian ecosystems: questions, challenges, and perspectives. Ecosphere 2(11):122. doi:10.1890/ES11-00241.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkin EK, Hölker F, Tockner K (2014) The effects of artificial lighting on adult aquatic and terrestrial insects. Freshw Biol 59(2):368–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabelis I (2013) Lichtverschmutzung durch Gewächshäuser in den Niederlanden. In: Held M, Hölker F, Jessel B (eds) Schutz der Nacht – Lichtverschmutzung, Biodiversität und Nachtlandschaft. BfN (Federal Agency for Nature Conservation)-Skripten 336, Bonn. pp 181–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Setlur AA, Radkov EV, Henderson CS, Her JH, Srivastava AM, Karkada N, Kishore MS, Kumar NP, Aesram D, Deshpande A, Kolodin B, Grigorov LS, Happek U (2010) Energy-efficient, high-color-rendering LED lamps using oxyfluoride and fluoride phosphors. Chem Mater 22(13):4076–4082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van’t Ooster A, van Henten EJ, Janssen EGON, Bongaerts E (2008) Use of supplementary lighting top screens and effects on greenhouse climate and return on investment. Acta Horticult 801:645–652

    Google Scholar 

  • Waks L (2013) Regulation of light pollution in France. In: Krop-Benesch A, Kyba CCM, Hölker F (eds) ALAN – first international conference on artificial light at night, Berlin, 28–30 Oct, pp 181–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanvik A (2009) Effects of road lighting: an analysis based on Dutch accident statistics 1987–2006. Accid Anal Prev 41:123–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2014) World Health Organization. International travel and health. http://www.who.int/ith/other_health_risks/injuries_violence/en/index.html

Further Reading

  • Bennie J, Davies TW, Duffy JP, Inger R, Gaston KJ (2014) Contrasting trends in light pollution across Europe based on satellite observed night time lights. Sci Rep 4:3789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CIE (2003) Guide on the limitation of the effect of obtrusive light from outdoor lighting installations. Publication No 150. CIE, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Longcore T, Rich C (2004) Ecological light pollution. Front Ecol Environ 2(4):191–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mizon B (2002) Light pollution: responses and remedies. Springer, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Posch T, Hölker F, Uhlmann T, Freyhoff A (2014) Das Ende der Nacht: Lichtsmog: Gefahren-Perspektiven-Lösungen. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We want to acknowledge the support by the European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) through the Action ES1204 LoNNe (Loss of the Night Network), and the national support by both the German Federal Ministry of Research and Technology (support code: 033L038A) and the Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (support code: 3514821700).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Müggelseedamm 310, 12587, Berlin, Germany

    Sibylle Schroer & Franz Hölker

Authors
  1. Sibylle Schroer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Franz Hölker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sibylle Schroer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Smart Lighting Engineering Center, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, USA

    Robert Karlicek

  2. Department of Optics and Photonics, National Central University, Jhongli, Taiwan

    Ching-Cherng Sun

  3. Toulouse University, Toulouse, France

    Georges Zissis

  4. OLED Lighting, Universal Display Corporation, Ewing, USA

    Ruiqing Ma

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Schroer, S., Hölker, F. (2014). Light Pollution Reduction. In: Karlicek, R., Sun, CC., Zissis, G., Ma, R. (eds) Handbook of Advanced Lighting Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00295-8_43-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00295-8_43-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-00295-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EngineeringReference Module Computer Science and Engineering

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation