Skip to main content

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Earth Sciences ((BRIEFSEARTH))

  • 1730 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter gives a brief review of the basic equations needed to simulate single-phase and two-phase (oil–water) flow through porous media. It discusses the governing partial-differential equations, their physical interpretation (especially the diffusive nature of pressures and the convective behavior of saturations), spatial discretization with finite differences, and the treatment of wells. It contains well-known theory and is primarily meant to form a basis for the next chapter where the equations will be reformulated in terms of systems-and-control notation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Darcy velocity or the filtration velocity , is the superficial velocity that would occur if the entire cross section, and not just the pores, would be open to flow. This is as opposed to the interstitial velocity \(\tilde{\nu}\), which is defined as \(\tilde{\nu}\,=\,\nu/\phi \), and which is the true fluid velocity in the pore space. The Darcy velocity can also be interpreted as a volumetric flux , i.e. the amount of volume flowing through a unit of surface area per unit time.

  2. 2.

    We use an arrow above a vector or matrix to indicate that it its components are representing quantities in physical space. For example \( {\vec{\mathbf{v}}} \) is a velocity vector with one, two or three components, depending on whether we use a one-, two-, or three-dimensional reservoir description. Note that the spatial-coordinate vector \( {\vec{\mathbf{x}}} \) is unrelated to the state vector x as used in Chaps. 2 and 3. The use of the same symbol for two different quantities is somewhat unfortunate, but results from conventions in different disciplines.

  3. 3.

    Permeability has a dimension of length squared and is therefore expressed in SI units in m2. In reservoir engineering use is often made of Darcy units, which are defined as: 1 D = 9.869233 × 10−13 ≈ 10−12 m2.

  4. 4.

    More complicated boundary conditions are possible, e.g. by specifying a relationship between p and ∂p/∂n, a so-called mixed boundary condition. Furthermore, different boundary conditions may be specified along different parts of the boundary.

  5. 5.

    This two-dimensional grid-block numbering is introduced to obtain a systematic description of the transmissibilities in a two-dimensional reservoir model. In a numerical implementation, however, one normally uses a one-dimensional grid-block numbering as displayed in Fig. 1.3, and a connectivity table to list the pairs of adjacent grid blocks. See also Table 1.2 which illustrates the two different numbering systems as applied to Example 1.

  6. 6.

    Absence of source terms corresponds to considering the (1-D) flow between an injector and a producer, in which case the flow is driven through the boundary conditions.

  7. 7.

    The coefficients are still functions of saturation.

  8. 8.

    \( f_w(S_w) \) is sometimes referred to as the flux function.

  9. 9.

    In fact, the hyperbolic saturation equation in the form given in Eq. (1.73) is coupled to the elliptic pressure Eq. (1.67) because we assumed incompressible flow in its derivation. In that case the pressure changes are instantaneous.

  10. 10.

    We may either consider the water mass or the oil mass. Moreover, because we assume the fluids to be incompressible, it is sufficient to consider a volume balance rather than a mass balance.

  11. 11.

    As was first shown in Welge (1952), Eq. (1.92) implies that the tangent at \( f_w\) in \( S_{w}^{*} \) and the secant from \( S_{wc} \) to \( S_{w}^{*} \) are identical, leading to a simple graphical solution procedure, known as the Welge method, which was popular before the advent of computers.

  12. 12.

    In the upstream oil industry standard conditions are usually defined as a pressure p sc  = 100 kPa (14.7 psi) and a temperature T sc  = 15 °C (60 °F), which can be considered as typical for atmospheric conditions in temperate climates. Oil at standard conditions is often referred to as stock tank oil.

  13. 13.

    To stay in line with the notation used in the single-phase flow case, we should have used ϕ 0, ρ o,0 and ρ w,0 to indicate the pressure-independence of these parameters, but we have dropped the subscripts 0 to simplify the notation.

  14. 14.

    Here the sub-matrices are displayed as vectors, which form, however, building blocks for matrices when the equations for multiple grid blocks are combined.

  15. 15.

    As discussed before, we disregard the dependency of the transmissibility terms on pressure.

  16. 16.

    We use a bold-face italics font to represent vectors with properties at the grid-blocks boundaries, whereas the conventional bold-face font is used to represent vectors with properties at the grid-blocks centers. In particular we use p and p for pressures, λ and λ for mobilities, \(\varvec{\nu}\) and v for Darcy velocities, and \(\tilde{\varvec \nu}\) and \({\tilde{\bf{v}}}\) for interstitial velocities.

  17. 17.

    This is an example of an incidence matrix as used in the analysis of e.g. electrical or mechanical networks, to define the pattern of nodes and edges. Other names used in the literature are topology matrixor connectivity matrix . Note that we use the term connectivity in a slightly different sense; see p. 69.

References

  • Aarnes JE, Gimse T, Lie KA (2007) An introduction to the numerics of flow in porous media using Matlab. In: Hasle G, Lie KA, Quack E (eds) Geometric modeling, numerical simulation, and optimization; applied mathematics at SINTEF. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Aziz K, Settari A (1979) Petroleum reservoir simulation. Applied Science Publishers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bear J (1972) Dynamics of fluids in porous media. Elsevier, New York. Reprinted in 1988 by Dover, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley SE, Leverett MC (1942) Mechanisms of fluid displacement in sands. Pet Trans AIME 146:107–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Huan G, Ma Y (2006) Computational methods for multiphase flows in porous media. SIAM, Philadelphia

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ding Y, Lemonnier PA, Estebenet T, Magras J-F (2000) Control-volume method for simulation in the well vicinity for arbitrary well configurations. SPE J 5(1):118–125. doi:10.2118/62169-PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing RE (1983) Problems arising in the modeling of processes for hydrocarbon recovery. In: Ewing RE (ed) The mathematics of reservoir simulation. SIAM, Philadelphia

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fanchi JR (2006) Principles of applied reservoir simulation, 3rd edn. Gulf Professional Publishing, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerritsen MG, Durlofsky LJ (2005) Modeling fluid flow in oil reservoirs. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 37:211–238. doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.37.061903.175748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmig R (1997) Multiphase flow and transport processes in the subsurface. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen JD, Bosgra OH, Van den Hof PMJ (2008) Model-based control of multiphase flow in subsurface oil reservoirs. J Process Control 18:846–855. doi:10.1016/j.jprocont.2008.06.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lake LW (1989) Enhanced oil recovery. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattax CC, Dalton RL (1990) Reservoir simulation. SPE Monograph Series 13, SPE, Richardson

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver DS, Reynolds AC, Liu N (2008) Inverse theory for petroleum reservoir characterization and history matching. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Patankar SV (1980) Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow. Series in computational methods and in mechanics and thermal sciences, Taylor and Francis

    Google Scholar 

  • Peaceman DW (1977) Fundamentals of numerical reservoir simulation. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Peaceman DW (1978) Interpretation of well-block pressures in numerical reservoir simulation. SPE J 18(3):183–194. doi:10.2118/6893-PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Peaceman DW (1983) Interpretation of well-block pressures in numerical reservoir simulation with nonsquare grid blocks and anisotropic permeability. SPE J 23(3):531–543. doi:10.2118/10528-PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Russel TF, Wheeler MF (1983) Finite-element and finite-difference methods for continuous flows in porous media. In: Ewing RE (ed) The mathematics of reservoir simulation. SIAM, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Welge HJ (1952) A simplified method for computing oil recovery by gas or water drive. Pet Trans AIME 195:91–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitson CH, Brulé MR (2000) Phase behavior. SPE Monograph Series 20, SPE, Richardson

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Dirk Jansen .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jansen, J.D. (2013). Porous-Media Flow. In: A Systems Description of Flow Through Porous Media. SpringerBriefs in Earth Sciences. Springer, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00260-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics