Skip to main content

Translational Bioinformatics and Clinical Research Informatics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Medical Informatics, e-Health

Part of the book series: Health Informatics ((HI))

Abstract

Two new emerging sub-domains in biomedical informatics – translational bioinformatics and clinical research informatics – provide information technology (IT) solutions supporting research – whether basic, clinical or translational research. The aim of the so-called “translational research” is to improve the continuum between research and care and to facilitate personalized medicine. Translational research requires better cooperation between basic research centers, healthcare facilities, clinical research and public health organizations and therefore better integration of information systems of these sectors.

This chapter presents the main characteristics of information systems used in the biomedical research domain and especially focuses on the information technology (IT) infrastructures developed to better integrate clinical care and research activities. The opportunities for the different stakeholders and the main challenges faced while developing such infrastructures are presented. The technical challenges are especially addressed (semantic interoperability, data integration, solutions ensuring data quality, data security and patient privacy, data mining). The potential of EHRs and PHRs to improve patient recruitment, conduct feasibility studies, refine inclusion/exclusion criteria, enhance safety data and, in general, to inform basic and clinical research is addressed. Examples of key national or international information technology (IT) infrastructures dedicated to translational research are shortly described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.amia.org/applications-informatics/translational-bioinformatics

  2. 2.

    This guide, edited in May 2007 by the “Food and Drug Administration” (FDA) and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services supplements the guidance for industry entitled “21 CFR Part 11” (Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures – Scope and Application), dated August 2003 and the Agency's international harmonization efforts (E6 Good Clinical Practice) when applying these guidances to source data generated at clinical study sites.

References

  • Aryanto KYE, Broekema A, Oudkerk M, Van Ooijen PMA (2012) Implementation of an anonymisation tool for clinical trials using a clinical trial processor integrated with an existing trial patient data information system. Eur Radiol 22:144–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ash JS, Anderson NR, Tarczy-Hornoch P (2008) People and organizational issues in research systems implementation. J Am Med Inform Assoc 15:283–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA et al (2000) Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 25:25–29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstam EV, Hersh WR, Johnson SB et al (2009) Synergies and distinctions between computational disciplines in biomedical research: perspective from the Clinical and Translational Science Award programs. Acad Med 84:964–970

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown PJ, Sönksen P (2000) Evaluation of the quality of information retrieval of clinical findings from a computerized patient database using a semantic terminological model. J Am Med Inform Assoc 7:392–403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brownstein JS, Sordo M, Kohane IS, Mandl KD (2007) The tell-tale heart: population-based surveillance reveals an association of rofecoxib and celecoxib with myocardial infarction. PLoS One 2(9):e840

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burgun A, Bodenreider O (2008) Accessing and integrating data and knowledge for biomedical research. Yearb Med Inform 91–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Butte AJ (2008a) Medicine. The ultimate model organism. Science 320:325–327

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Butte AJ (2008b) Translational bioinformatics: coming of age. J Am Med Inform Assoc 15:709–714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Canim M, Kantarcioglu M, Malin B (2012) Secure management of biomedical data with cryptographic hardware. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 16:166–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CDISC (2013) http://www.cdisc.org/. Accessed 5 Oct 2013

  • Chen R, Mias GI, Li-Pook-Than J et al (2012) Personal omics profiling reveals dynamic molecular and medical phenotypes. Cell 148:1293–1307

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Covitz PA, Hartel F, Schaefer C et al (2003) caCORE: a common infrastructure for cancer informatics. Bioinformatics 19:2404–2412

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cuggia M, Besana P, Glasspool D (2011) Comparing semi-automatic systems for recruitment of patients to clinical trials. Int J Med Inform 80:371–388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dugas M, Lange M, Müller-Tidow C et al (2010) Routine data from hospital information systems can support patient recruitment for clinical studies. Clin Trials 7:183–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • El Fadly A, Rance B, Lucas N et al (2011) Integrating clinical research with the Healthcare Enterprise: from the RE-USE project to the EHR4CR platform. J Biomed Inform 44(Suppl 1):S94–S102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Embi PJ, Payne PRO (2009) Clinical research informatics: challenges, opportunities and definition for an emerging domain. J Am Med Inform Assoc 16:316–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • FDA (2013) Computerized Systems Used in Clinical Investigations. http://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/98fr/04d-0440-gdl0002.pdf. Accessed 5 Oct 2013

  • Fridsma DB, Evans J, Hastak S, Mead CN (2008) The BRIDG project: a technical report. J Am Med Inform Assoc 15:130–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaughan A (2006) Bridging the divide: the need for translational informatics. Pharmacogenomics 7:117–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • IHE QRPH (2013) IHE Quality Research and Public Health. http://www.ihe.net/qrph/index.cfm. Accessed 5 Oct 2013

  • Kohane IS, Churchill SE, Murphy SN (2012) A translational engine at the national scale: informatics for integrating biology and the bedside. J Am Med Inform Assoc 19:181–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kush R, Alschuler L, Ruggeri R et al (2007) Implementing single source: the STARBRITE proof-of-concept study. J Am Med Inform Assoc 14:662–673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kush RD, Helton E, Rockhold FW, Hardison CD (2008) Electronic health records, medical research, and the Tower of Babel. N Engl J Med 358:1738–1740

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Masys DR, Jarvik GP, Abernethy NF et al (2012) Technical desiderata for the integration of genomic data into electronic health records. J Biomed Inform 45:419–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy SN, Mendis M, Hackett K, et al (2007) Architecture of the open-source clinical research chart from informatics for integrating biology and the bedside. AMIA annual symposium proceedings, pp 548–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy SN, Gainer V, Mendis M et al (2011) Strategies for maintaining patient privacy in i2b2. J Am Med Inform Assoc 18(Suppl 1):i103–i108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy SN, Dubey A, Embi PJ et al (2012) Current state of information technologies for the clinical research enterprise across academic medical centers. Clin Transl Sci 5:281–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nadkarni PM, Brandt CA (2006) The common data elements for cancer research: remarks on functions and structure. Methods Inf Med 45:594–601

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ohmann C, Kuchinke W (2009) Future developments of medical informatics from the viewpoint of networked clinical research. Interoperability and integration. Methods Inf Med 48:45–54

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Payne PRO, Embi PJ, Sen CK (2009) Translational informatics: enabling high-throughput research paradigms. Physiol Genomics 39(3):131–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prokosch HU, Ganslandt T (2009) Perspectives for medical informatics. Reusing the electronic medical record for clinical research. Methods Inf Med 48:38–44

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey SD, Scoggins JF, Blough DK et al (2009) Sensitivity of administrative claims to identify incident cases of lung cancer: a comparison of 3 health plans. J Manag Care Pharm 15:659–668

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar IN (2010) Biomedical informatics and translational medicine. J Transl Med 8:22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tan TW, Tong JC, Khan AM et al (2010) Advancing standards for bioinformatics activities: persistence, reproducibility, disambiguation and Minimum Information About a Bioinformatics investigation (MIABi). BMC Genomics 11(Suppl 4):S27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor CF, Field D, Sansone S-A et al (2008) Promoting coherent minimum reporting guidelines for biological and biomedical investigations: the MIBBI project. Nat Biotechnol 26:889–896

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Te FC, Chunyan W, Zhiyuan S (2012) The impact of development of population-based study in the biomedical field on laws and regulations: a cross-strait experience on biobank development. J Int Bioethique 23(143–163):181–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang RY (1998) A product perspective on total data quality management. Commun ACM 41:58–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warzel DB, Andonaydis C, McCurry B, et al (2003) Common data element (CDE) management and deployment in clinical trials. AMIA annual symposium proceedings, p 1048

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber GM, Murphy SN, McMurry AJ et al (2009) The Shared Health Research Information Network (SHRINE): a prototype federated query tool for clinical data repositories. J Am Med Inform Assoc 16:624–630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weng C, Tu SW, Sim I, Richesson R (2010) Formal representation of eligibility criteria: a literature review. J Biomed Inform 43:451–467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhan C, Elixhauser A, Richards CL Jr et al (2009) Identification of hospital-acquired catheter-associated urinary tract infections from Medicare claims: sensitivity and positive predictive value. Med Care 47:364–369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Daniel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag France

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Daniel, C., Albuisson, E., Dart, T., Avillach, P., Cuggia, M., Guo, Y. (2014). Translational Bioinformatics and Clinical Research Informatics. In: Venot, A., Burgun, A., Quantin, C. (eds) Medical Informatics, e-Health. Health Informatics. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0478-1_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0478-1_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0477-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0478-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics