Skip to main content

A Review of Notations for Conceptual Modeling of Groupware Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Trends on Human–Computer Interaction

Abstract

The use of interactive applications to support group work is increasing. However, the development and, in particular, the design of this kind of applications is complicated. In recent years, the development based on conceptual modeling has acquired a greater importance and attention. This chapter presents a review of the main notations for the analysis and modeling of interaction and collaboration. This study has allowed us to detect that there are no proposals that tackle both issues jointly. We have created a methodological approach to solve this lack. This proposal includes notations, tools and procedures to give a comprehensive modeling support of groupware applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Paternò F (2004) ConcurTaskTrees: An Engineered Notation for Task Models. In: D. Diaper and N.A. Stanton (eds) The Handbook of Task Analysis for HCI. LEA, Mahwah, NJ., pp. 483–501.

    Google Scholar 

  2. van Welie, M. and G.C. van der Veer (2003) Groupware Task Analysis. In: E. Hollnagel (ed.) Handbook Of Cognitive Task Design, LEA., NJ. pp. 447–476.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Pinelle, D. (2004) Improving Groupware Design for Loosely Coupled Groups, in Department of Computer Science. PhD thesis, University of Saskatchewan.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lim, Y.-k. (2004) Multiple aspect based task analysis (MABTA) for user requirements gathering in highly-contextualized interactive system design. Third Annual Conference on Task models and Diagrams (TAMODIA 2004). Prague, Czech Republic: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carlsen, S. (1998) Action port model: A mixed paradigm conceptual workflow modelling language. Third IFCIS International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Trætteberg, H. (2002) Model-Based User Interface Design, in Department of Computer and Information Sciences. PhD. thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  7. van der Aalst, W.M.P., et al. (2001) Proclets: a framework for lightweight interacting workflow processes. Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 10 (4): 443–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Garrido, J.L., Gea, M., and M.L. Rodríguez, (2005) Requirements Engineering in Cooperative Systems. Requirements Engineering for Sociotechnical Systems. IDEA GROUP, Inc.USA, 226–244.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rubart, J. and P. Dawabi (2004) Shared Data modelling with UML-G. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, 19.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yu, E. (1995) Modelling Strategic Relationships for Process Reengineering, PhD thesis, University of Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dillenbourg, P., et al. (1995) The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In: P. Reimann, H. Spada, (eds) Learning in Humans and Machines: Towards an Interdisciplinary Learning Science. London, 189–211.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lacaze, X. and P. Palanque (2004) Comprehensive handling of temporal issues in tasks models: What is needed and how to support it? In Workshop ‘The Temporal Aspects of Work for HCI (CHI 2004)’. Vienna, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Molina, A.I., M.A. Redondo, and M. Ortega (2008). CIAM: A methodology for the development of groupware user interfaces. Journal of Universal Computer Science. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Molina, A.I., M.A. Redondo, and M. Ortega (2006) A conceptual and methodological framework for modelling interactive groupware applications. 12th International Workshop on Groupware (CRIWG 2006). Valladolid, Spain: Springer-Verlag (LNCS), 413–420.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Work supported by the Castilla–La Mancha University and Junta de Comunidades de Castilla–La Mancha in the project mGUIDE (PBC08-0006-512) and M-CUIDE (TC20080552).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana I. Molina .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Molina, A.I., Redondo, M.A., Ortega, M. (2009). A Review of Notations for Conceptual Modeling of Groupware Systems. In: Macías, J., Granollers Saltiveri, A., Latorre, P. (eds) New Trends on Human–Computer Interaction. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-352-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-352-5_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-351-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-352-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics