Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Anal Sphincteroplasty

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Complications of Female Incontinence and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery

Part of the book series: Current Clinical Urology ((CCU))

Abstract

Direct sphincter trauma or neuropathic injuries from vaginal deliveries are the principal causative factors in the development of fecal incontinence in women less than 40 years old [1]. Treatment options for the incontinent woman include anal sphincteroplasty, sacral nerve stimulation (SNS), artificial anal sphincter, posterior anal repair, and dynamic graciloplasty. Anal sphincteroplasty has been the preferred surgical treatment for the symptomatic female with an anatomically disrupted external anal sphincter (EAS) muscle. Short-term results report improved bowel incontinence as high as 90% [2, 3] with decreasing continence on long-term follow-up studies. Over the past decade, SNS has been utilized as a treatment modality with good results for patients with fecal incontinence with or without an anal sphincter defect [4–7], but SNS has only recently approved in the USA for this indication. The artificial anal sphincter, a silastic band surgically placed around the lower rectum, has been shown to improve bowel control. However, infection rates are reported at 33% [8, 9] leading to device failure or extrusion. Posterior anal repair is indicated for neuropathic incontinence and not very popular as its earlier results could not be duplicated. At best, only about 30% of the patients report improvement [10–12]. However, several long-term studies have shown favorable results [13, 14]. Dynamic graciloplasty is a complex procedure that involves gracilious muscle transposition and stimulation. This requires expertise; it is associated with a high morbidity and it is expensive [15–20]. This procedure is not an option in the United States since the stimulator used for muscle contraction is not commercially available. Other options include injectable bulking agents [21–24] into the anal sphincter which have shown to be effective in some studies, but are not presently approved in the USA for treatment of fecal incontinence. Transobturator insertion of a rectal sling has been reported with some success [25] and ongoing USA studies are in progress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Bartram CI, Hudson CN. Anal sphincter trauma during instrumental delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1993;43(3):263–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Simmang C, Birnbaum EH, Kodner IJ, Fry RD, Fleshman JW. Anal sphincter reconstruction in the elderly: does advancing age affect outcome? Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37(11):1065–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Grey BR, Sheldon RR, Telford KJ, Kiff ES. Anterior anal sphincter repair can be of long term benefit: a 12-year case cohort from a single surgeon. BMC Surg. 2007;7:1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jarrett ME, Dudding TC, Nicholls RJ, Vaizey CJ, Cohen CR, Kamm MA. Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence related to obstetric anal sphincter damage. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51(5):531–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chan MK, Tjandra JJ. Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: external anal sphincter defect vs. intact anal sphincter. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51(7):1015–24; discussion 1024–5.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Leroi AM, Parc Y, Lehur PA, et al. Efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: results of a multicenter double-blind crossover study. Ann Surg. 2005;242(5):662–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wexner SD, Coller JA, Devroede G, et al. Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: results of a 120-patient prospective multicenter study. Ann Surg. 2010;251(3):441–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wong WD, Jensen LL, Bartolo DC, Rothenberger DA. Artificial anal sphincter. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39(12):1345–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Christiansen J, Rasmussen OO, Lindorff-Larsen K. Long-term results of artificial anal sphincter implantation for severe anal incontinence. Ann Surg. 1999;230(1):45–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Engel AF, van Baal SJ, Brummelkamp WH. Late results of postanal repair for idiopathic faecal incontinence. Eur J Surg. 1994;160(11):637–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jameson JS, Speakman CT, Darzi A, Chia YW, Henry MM. Audit of postanal repair in the treatment of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37(4): 369–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Setti Carraro P, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ. Long-term results of postanal repair for neurogenic faecal incontinence. Br J Surg. 1994;81(1):140–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Abbas SM, Bissett IP, Neill ME, Parry BR. Long-term outcome of postanal repair in the treatment of faecal incontinence. ANZ J Surg. 2005;75(9):783–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mackey P, Mackey L, Kennedy ML, et al. Postanal repair—do the long-term results justify the procedure? Colorectal Dis. 2010;12(4):367–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sielezneff I, Malouf AJ, Bartolo DC, Pryde A, Douglas S. Dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of patients with faecal incontinence. Br J Surg. 1999;86(1):61–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Eccersley AJ, Williams NS. Dynamic graciloplasty for severe anal incontinence. Br J Surg. 1998;85(8): 1158–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rosen HR, Novi G, Zoech G, Feil W, Urbarz C, Schiessel R. Restoration of anal sphincter function by single-stage dynamic graciloplasty with a modified (split sling) technique. Am J Surg. 1998;175(3):187–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Christiansen J, Rasmussen OO, Lindorff-Larsen K. Dynamic graciloplasty for severe anal incontinence. Br J Surg. 1998;85(1):88–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Baeten CG, Geerdes BP, Adang EM, et al. Anal dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of intractable fecal incontinence. N Engl J Med. 1995;332(24):1600–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mander BJ, Wexner SD, Williams NS, et al. Preliminary results of a multicentre trial of the electrically stimulated gracilis neoanal sphincter. Br J Surg. 1999;86(12):1543–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chan MK, Tjandra JJ. Injectable silicone biomaterial (PTQ) to treat fecal incontinence after hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49(4):433–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Davis K, Kumar D, Poloniecki J. Preliminary evaluation of an injectable anal sphincter bulking agent (Durasphere) in the management of faecal incontinence. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;18(2):237–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kenefick NJ, Vaizey CJ, Malouf AJ, Norton CS, Marshall M, Kamm MA. Injectable silicone biomaterial for faecal incontinence due to internal anal sphincter dysfunction. Gut. 2002;51(2):225–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA. Injectable bulking agents for treating faecal incontinence. Br J Surg. 2005;92(5): 521–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yamana T, Takahashi T, Iwadare J. Perineal puborectalis sling operation for fecal incontinence: preliminary report. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47(11): 1982–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Halverson AL, Hull TL. Long-term outcome of overlapping anal sphincter repair. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45(3):345–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nikiteas N, Korsgen S, Kumar D, Keighley MR. Audit of sphincter repair. Factors associated with poor outcome. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39(10):1164–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zutshi M, Tracey TH, Bast J, Halverson A, Na J. Ten-year outcome after anal sphincter repair for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(6):1089–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Keighley M, Williams N. Fecal incontinence. In: Keighley M, editor. Surgery of the anus, colon and rectum, vol. 1. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Evans C, Davis K, Kumar D. Overlapping anal sphincter repair and anterior levatorplasty: effect of patient’s age and duration of follow-up. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2006;21(8):795–801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Vaizey CJ, Norton C, Thornton MJ, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA. Long-term results of repeat anterior anal sphincter repair. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47(6): 858–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gilliland R, Altomare DF, Moreira Jr H, Oliveira L, Gilliland JE, Wexner SD. Pudendal neuropathy is predictive of failure following anterior overlapping sphincteroplasty. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41(12): 1516–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hasegawa H, Yoshioka K, Keighley MR. Randomized trial of fecal diversion for sphincter repair. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43(7):961–4; discussion 964–5.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tjandra JJ, Han WR, Goh J, Carey M, Dwyer P. Direct repair vs. overlapping sphincter repair: a randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46(7):937–42; discussion 942–3.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Galandiuk S, Roth LA, Greene QJ. Anal incontinence-sphincter ani repair: indications, techniques, outcome. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2009;394(3):425–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Karoui S, Leroi AM, Koning E, Menard JF, Michot F, Denis P. Results of sphincteroplasty in 86 patients with anal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000; 43(6):813–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Bravo Gutierrez A, Madoff RD, Lowry AC, Parker SC, Buie WD, Baxter NN. Long-term results of anterior sphincteroplasty. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47(5): 727–31; discussion 731–2.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Barisic GI, Krivokapic ZV, Markovic VA, Popovic MA. Outcome of overlapping anal sphincter repair after 3 months and after a mean of 80 months. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2006;21(1):52–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Oom DM, Gosselink MP, Schouten WR. Anterior sphincteroplasty for fecal incontinence: a single center experience in the era of sacral neuromodulation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(10):1681–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Johnson E, Carlsen E, Steen TB, Backer Hjorthaug JO, Eriksen MT, Johannessen HO. Short- and long-term results of secondary anterior sphincteroplasty in 33 patients with obstetric injury. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(11):1466–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Colorectal Surgery A30, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA

    Patricia C. Alves-Ferreira PT & Brooke Gurland MD, FACS

Authors
  1. Patricia C. Alves-Ferreira PT
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brooke Gurland MD, FACS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brooke Gurland MD, FACS .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, The Cleveland Clinic, Center for Female Pelvic Medicine and Re, 9500 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, 44195, Ohio, USA

    Howard B. Goldman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alves-Ferreira, P.C., Gurland, B. (2013). Anal Sphincteroplasty. In: Goldman, H. (eds) Complications of Female Incontinence and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery. Current Clinical Urology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-924-2_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-924-2_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-61779-923-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-61779-924-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation