Abstract
Raman spectroscopy is an optical technique for the vibrational spectroscopy of molecules. It is a rather unique and powerful technique, because, similar to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or X-ray imaging, it is capable of live cell chemical analysis and imaging without destroying or altering the biological materials under investigation. In contrast to these techniques, however, Raman spectroscopy works really well at the cellular and subcellular levels, because it can easily be integrated with optical microscopy. Also, it does not require exogenous probes, such as in fluorescence microscopy, but instead relies fully on an intrinsically generated signal. Raman spectroscopy is based on the fact that a very small number of photons from an intense light source (typically a laser) can inelastically scatter off molecular bonds in a sample, leading todiscrete shifts in the wavelength (or color) of the scattered photons. This chapter will provide a brief introduction to Raman spectroscopy, explain the principles behind it, provide a brief “how-to” guide for interested experimentalists, and discuss applications and recent advancements in the chemical analysis of living cells.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Raman CV, Krishnan KS. 1928. A new type of secondary radiation. Nature 121:501-502.
Smith E, Dent G. 2005. Modern raman spectroscopy: a practical approach. New York: Wiley.
Pawley JB, ed. 2006. Handbook of biological confocal microscopy. 3rd ed. New York: Springer.
Jeanmaire DL, Vanduyne RP. 1977. Surface Raman spectroelectrochemistry, 1: heterocyclic, aromatic, and aliphatic-amines adsorbed on anodized silver electrode. J Electroanal Chem 84:1-20.
Otto A, Mrozek I, Grabhorn H, Akemann W. 1992. Surface-enhanced Raman-scattering. J Phys Condens Matter 4:1143-1212.
Moskovits M. 1985. Surface-enhanced spectroscopy. Rev Mod Phys 57:783-828.
Michaels AM, Jiang J, Brus LE. 2000. Ag nanocrystal junctions as the site for surface-enhanced Raman scattering of single rhodamine 6G molecules. J Phys Chem B 104:11965-11971.
Talley CE, Jackson JB, Oubre C, Grady NK, Hollars CW, Lane SM, Huser TR, Nordlander P, Halas NJ. 2005. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering from individual Au nanoparticles and nanoparticle dimer substrates. Nano Lett 5:1569-1574.
Jackson J, Halas N. 2004. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering on tunable plasmonic nanoparticle substrates. PNAS 101:17930-17935.
Schwartzberg AM, Oshiro TY, Zhang JZ, Huser T, Talley CE. 2006. Improving nanoprobes using surface- enhanced Raman scattering from 30-nm hollow gold particles. Anal Chem 78:4732-4736.
Haynes CL, McFarland AD, Van Duyne RP. 2005. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Anal Chem 77:A338-346A.
Vo-Dinh T, Yan F, Wabuyele MB. 2005. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering for medical diagnostics and biological imaging. J Raman Spectrosc 36:640-647.
Lyandres O, Shah NC, Yonzon CR, Walsh Jr JT, Glucksberg MR, Van Duyne RP. 2005. Real-time glucose sensing by surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy in bovine plasma facilitated by a mixed decanethiol/mercaptohexanol partition layer. Anal Chem 77:6134-6139.
Stuart DA, Yonzon CR, Zhang X, Lyandres O, Shah NC, Glucksberg MR, Walsh JT, Van Duyne RP. 2005. Glucose sensing using near-infrared surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy: gold surfaces, 10-day stability, and improved accuracy. Anal Chem 77:4013-4019.
Yonzon CR, Haynes CL, Zhang X, Walsh Jr JT, Van Duyne RP. 2004. A glucose biosensor based on surface-enhanced Raman scattering: improved partition layer, temporal stability, reversibility, and resistance to serum protein interference. Anal Chem 76:78-85.
Stuart DA, Yuen JM, Shah N, Lyandres O, Yonzon CR, Glucksberg MR, Walsh JT, Van Duyne RP. 2006. In vivo glucose measurement by surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Anal Chem 78:7211-7215.
Vo-Dinh T, Allain LR, Stokes DL. 2002. Cancer gene detection using surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS). J Raman Spectrosc 33:511-516.
Allain LR, Vo-Dinh T. 2002. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering detection of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1 using a silver-coated microarray platform. Anal Chim Acta 469:149-154.
Cao YC, Jin R, Mirkin CA. 2002. Nanoparticles with Raman spectroscopic fingerprints for DNA and RNA detection. Science 297:1536-1540.
Qian X, Peng XH, Ansari DO, Yin-Goen Q, Chen GZ, Shin DM, Yang L, Young AN, Wang MD, Nie S. 2008. In vivo tumor targeting and spectroscopic detection with surface-enhanced Raman nanoparticle tags. N Biotecnol 26:83-90.
Crane NJ, Morris MD, Ignelzi MA, Yu GG. 2005. Raman imaging demonstrates FGF2-induced craniosynostosis in mouse calvaria. J Biomed Opt 10:8.
Kazanci M, Wagner HD, Manjubala NI, Gupta HS, Paschalis E, Roschger P, Fratzl P. 2007. Raman imaging of two orthogonal planes within cortical bone. Bone 41:456-461.
Zhang GJ, Moore DJ, Flach CR, Mendelsohn R. 2007. Vibrational microscopy and imaging of skin: from single cells to intact tissue. Anal Bioanal Chem 387:1591-1599.
Zhang GJ, Moore DJ, Sloan KB, Flach CR, Mendelsohn R. 2007. Imaging the prodrug-to-drug transformation of a 5-fluorouracil derivative in skin by confocal Raman microscopy. J Invest Dermatol 127:1205-1209.
Burkacky O, Zumbusch A, Brackmann C, Enejder A. 2006. Dual-pump coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy. Opt Lett 31:3656-3658.
Fu Y, Wang HF, Shi RY, Cheng JX. 2007. Second harmonic and sum frequency generation imaging of fibrous astroglial filaments in ex vivo spinal tissues. Biophys J 92:3251-3259.
Cheng JX, Jia YK, Zheng GF, Xie XS. 2002. Laser-scanning coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy and applications to cell biology. Biophys J 83:502-509.
Cheng JX, Volkmer A, Xie XS. 2002. Theoretical and experimental characterization of coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy. J Opt Soc Am B 19:1363-1375.
Cheng JX, Xie XS. 2004. Coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy: instrumentation, theory, and applications. J Phys Chem B 108:827-840.
Djaker N, Lenne PF, Marguet D, Colonna A, Hadjur C, Rigneault H. 2007. Coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy (CARS): instrumentation and applications. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 571:177-181.
Evans CL, Potma EO, Puoris'haag M, Cote D, Lin CP, Xie XS. 2005. Chemical imaging of tissue in vivo with video-rate coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:16807-16812.
Huff TB, Cheng JX. 2007. In vivo coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering imaging of sciatic nerve tissue. J Microsc Oxford 225:175-182.
Kano H, Hamaguchi H. 2005. Vibrationally resonant imaging of a single living cell by supercontinuum-based multiplex coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microspectroscopy. Opt Express 13:1322-1327.
Muller M, Zumbusch A. 2007. Coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy. Chemphyschem 8:2157-2170.
Nan XL, Potma EO, Xie XS. 2006. Nonperturbative chemical imaging of organelle transport in living cells with coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy. Biophys J 91:728-735.
Rodriguez LG, Lockett SJ, Holtom GR. 2006. Coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy: a biological review. Cytometry A 69A:779-791.
Tong L, Lu Y, Lee RJ, Cheng JX. 2007. Imaging receptor-mediated endocytosis with a polymeric nanoparticle-based coherent anti-Stokes raman scattering probe. J Phys Chem B 111:9980-9985.
Volkmer A, Cheng JX, Xie XS. 2001. Vibrational imaging with high sensitivity via epidetected coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy. Phys Rev Lett 8702:4.
Wang HF, Fu Y, Zickmund P, Shi RY, Cheng JX. 2005. Coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering imaging of axonal myelin in live spinal tissues. Biophys J 89:581-591.
Duncan MD, Reintjes J, Manuccia TJ. 1982. Scanning Coherent anti-Stokes Raman Microscope. Opt Lett 7:350-352.
Zumbusch A, Holtom GR, Xie XS. 1999. Three-dimensional vibrational imaging by coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering. Phys Rev Lett 82:4142-4145.
Cheng JX, Xie XS. 2004. Coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy: Instrumentation, theory, and applications [Review]. J Phys Chem B 108:827-840.
Cheng JX, Volkmer A, Book LD, Xie XS. 2001. An epi-detected coherent anti-Stokes raman scattering (E- CARS) microscope with high spectral resolution and high sensitivity. J Phys Chem B 105:1277-1280.
Hashimoto M, Araki T. 2000. Molecular vibration imaging in the fingerprint region by use of coherent anti- Stokes Raman scattering microscopy with a collinear configuration. Opt Lett 25:1768-1770.
Lee ES, Lee JY, Yoo YS. 2007. Nonlinear optical interference of two successive coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering signals for biological imaging applications. J Biomed Opt 12:5.
Potma EO, Evans CL, Xie XS. 2006. Heterodyne coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS) imaging. Opt Lett 31:241-243.
Toytman I, Cohn K, Smith T, Simanovskii D, Palanker D. 2007. Wide-field coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy with non-phase-matching illumination. Opt Lett 32:1941-1943.
Fu Y, Wang HF, Shi RY, Cheng JX. 2006. Characterization of photodamage in coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy. Opt Express 14:3942-3951.
Ganikhanov F, Carrasco S, Xie XS, Katz M, Seitz W, Kopf D. 2006. Broadly tunable dual-wavelength light source for coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy. Opt Lett 31:1292-1294.
Le TT, Langohr IM, Locker MJ, Sturek M, Cheng J-X. 2007. Label-free molecular imaging of atherosclerotic lesions using multimodal nonlinear optical microscopy. J Biomed Opt 12:10.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
8.1 Electronic Supplementary material
Figure 8.1.
(a) Schematics of an inelastic photon scattering event: incoming photons with energy E i scatter off a molecular bond, thereby depositing energy into the bond vibration. The outgoing, inelastically scattered photons have a slightly lower energy E s . (b) Model of a molecular bond: two atoms with masses M 1 and M 2 are connected by a spring with spring constant k. The energy of the resulting vibration written in spectroscopic terms is shown below, where c is the speed of light and µ = M 1 M 2l(M 1 + M 2) is the reduced mass of both atoms. Please visit http://extras.springer.com/ to view a high-resolution full-color version of this illustration. (PDF 2,774 KB)
Figure 8.2.
(a) Schematics of an inelastic photon scattering event where the photon deposits energy into the bond vibration, and its associated energy diagram. The scattered photon has lost energy relative to the incident photon. This process is called Stokes-shifted Raman scattering. (b) Schematics of an inelastic photon scattering event where the photon scatters off a vibrationally excited bond, and its associated energy diagram. The scattered photon has gained energy relative to the incident photon. This process is called anti-Stokes-shifted Raman scattering. Please visit http://extras.springer.com/ to view a high-resolution full-color antiversion of this illustration. (PDF 2,779 KB)
Figure 8.3.
The energy diagram describing Raman scattering is directly related to the Raman spectrum of a molecule. Here, the energy of the incoming photons (e.g., from a laser) defines the vibrational ground state, while the scattered photons are shifted to the red (blue) depending on the bond vibration and the scattering process. This is shown schematically for the spectrum (red) obtained from an unsaturated fatty acid (oleic acid), where the lipid CH deformation mode results in a peak at 1442 cm–1. Other peaks are not assigned to keep the energy diagram simple. Please visit http://extras.springer.com/ to view a high-resolution full-color version of this illustration. (PDF 2,767 KB)
Figure 8.4.
The fingerprint Raman spectrum of oleic acid results in both Stokes and anti-Stokes scattered photons. The distribution with which each fraction of photons is scattered to the left or right of the laser line (blue) depends on the temperature. Raman spectra are labeled in relative wavenumbers (cm–1) to describe the spectrum in terms independent of the source wavelength. Please visit http://extras.springer.com/ to view a high-resolution full-color version of this illustration. (PDF 2,760 KB)
Figure 8.5.
The strength of the Raman scattering process depends on the wavelength of the source. Since it is a scattering process, the intensity of the inelastically scattered light scales with λ–4. This leads to Raman spectra obtained from the same compound to be more intense when probed with a green laser (box a) rather than a red laser (box b). Also, since green light has a higher photon energy than red light, Raman scattering off the same molecular bond can lead to more “condensed” or “stretched” spectra depending on the laser wavelength. Since Raman scattering by a specific bond always requires the same amount of energy, independent of the wavelength of the source, spectra obtained with a green laser are “denser” relative to those obtained with a red laser (when plotted against a wavelength axis). This is the reason why Raman spectra are typically plotted in terms of the energy difference between the source wavelength and the signal wavelength. These spectra are independent of the wavelength at which they were obtained. Please visit http://extras.springer.com/ to view a high-resolution full-color version of this illustration. (PDF 2,783 KB)
Figure 8.6.
An example of Raman spectra observed from biological samples, in this case bovine sperm cells. (a) Intact, whole sperm cells are deposited onto a quartz cover slip and imaged in a confocal Raman microscope based on their autofluorescence. Specific areas, i.e., the sperm head (I) or sperm tail (II), can then be addressed by point spectroscopy. The resulting spectra and their assigned bond vibrations (see b) show that the sperm head is mostly composed of DNA and proteins (spectrum I), while the major constituent of the tail is just protein (spectrum II). Please visit http://extras.springer.com/ to view a high-resolution full- color version of this illustration. (PDF 2,803 KB)
Figure 8.7.
Modern Raman spectrometers require at least two sets of filters. A laser clean-up (narrow bandpass) filter on the excitation side removes plasma lines and other background contributions that can easily overwhelm the weak Raman signal. On the detection side a steep edge notch filter with high rejection for the laser line (optical density OD > 6) enables detection of both the Stokes and anti-Stokesscattered light. Instead, lower-cost steep-edge longpass filters can also be used, but enable only detection of Stokes-shifted photons. Please visit http://extras.springer.com/ to view a high-resolution full-color version of this illustration. (PDF 2,762 KB)
Figure 8.8.
Diagram of a confocal micro-Raman spectroscopy setup. Light from a continuous wave laser passes a dichroic beamsplitter and is focused onto the sample through a microscope objective lens. The same lens collects the backscattered Raman photons, which are deflected to the left by the dichroic beamsplitter. A spatial filter assembly ensures that only Raman-scattered photons from the very focus of the laser beam at the sample are sent to the detectors, which could utilize a point detector for Raman imaging of a single vibrational mode, or a spectrometer for collecting the entire Raman spectrum. Please visit http://extras.springer.com/ to view a high-resolution full-color version of this illustration. (PDF 2,773 KB)
Figure 8.9.
Calibration of Raman spectra typically utilize a well-characterized substance. Toluene and some alcohols, or mixtures thereof, of strong Raman-active modes spanning most of the fingerprint and high-wavenumber region. Their spectra are also relatively independent of temperature fluctuations, making them good calibration standards. The spectrum shown here was obtained from toluene by gently focusing ~300 μW of power from a red helium-neon laser (632.8 nm wavelength) into a solution of pure toluene. The spectrum was dispersed onto a CCD camera with 1340 pixels by a 600-line/mm grating and the signal was integrated for 30 s. Please visit http://extras.springer.com/ to view a high-resolution full-color version of this illustration. (PDF 2,780 KB)
Figure 8.10.
Rapid Raman imaging by coherent Raman scattering. (a) Energy diagram describing the nonlinear optical process of coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering. To image bacterial spores by their intense 1013 cm–1 vibration from calcium dipicolinate, two short-pulsed lasers are synchronized and tuned to probe this molecular mode. (c) A pump laser at 750-nm wavelength (for instance) provides two photons that, when combined with a single photon from another laser at 812 nm, coherently probe the 1013 cm–1 vibration. (d) The resulting signal is an intense line at 697 nm composed of a Raman-resonant anti-Stokes Raman signal originating from the molecular vibration, as well as a non-resonant background signal due to four-wave mixing of the photons in the material. (b) The intense signal can then be utilized to obtain an image of bacterial spores prepared on a glass substrate. Please visit http://extras.springer.com/ to view a high imresolution full-color version of this illustration. (PDF 2,798 KB)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Weeks, T., Huser, T. (2010). Raman Spectroscopy of Living Cells. In: Jue, T. (eds) Biomedical Applications of Biophysics. Handbook of Modern Biophysics, vol 3. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-233-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-233-9_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-60327-232-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-60327-233-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)