Skip to main content

Costs Versus Outcomes of Robotic Surgery of the Head and Neck

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Robotic Surgery of the Head and Neck

Abstract

Advances in oncologic technology through robotic surgery have aimed to reduce patient mortality while maintaining similar surgical outcomes as other older techniques [1]. When robotic surgery was first explored, Intuitive Surgical® developed the da Vinci surgical robot for procedures originally in urology [2]. In recent years, robotic surgery has become smoothly incorporated into head and neck oncologic surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Yang DY, Monn MF, Bahler CD, Sundaram CP. Does robotic assistance confer an economic benefit during laparoscopic radical nephrectomy? J Urol. 2014;192:671–6. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2014.04.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yu HY, Hevelone ND, Lipsitz SR, Kowalczyk KJ, Hu JC. Use, costs and comparative effectiveness of robotic assisted, laparoscopic and open urological surgery. J Urol. 2012;187(4):1392–8. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2011.11.089. Epub 16 Feb 2012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barnett JC, Judd JP, Wu JM, Scales Jr CD, Myers ER, Havrilesky LJ. Cost comparison among robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(3):685–93. doi:10.1097/AOG.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kajiwara N, Patrick Barron J, Kato Y, Kakihana M, Ohira T, Kawate N, Ikeda N.Cost-Benefit Performance of Robotic Surgery Compared with Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery under the Japanese National Health Insurance System. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014. doi:10.5761/atcs.oa.14-00076. Epub 16 May 2014.

  5. Dombrée M, Crott R, Lawson G, Janne P, Castiaux A, Krug B. Cost comparison of open approach, transoral laser microsurgery and transoral robotic surgery for partial and total laryngectomies. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;271:2852–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kang SW, Lee SC, Lee SH, Lee KY, Jeong JJ, Lee YS, Nam KH, Chang HS, Chung WY, Park CS. Robotic thyroid surgery using a gasless, transaxillary approach and the da Vinci S system: the operative outcomes of 338 consecutive patients. Surgery. 2009;146(6):1048–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Koh YW, Kim JW, Lee SW, Choi EC. Endoscopic thyroidectomy via a unilateral axillo-breast approach without gas insufflation for unilateral benign thyroid lesions. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(9):2053–60. doi:10.1007/s00464-008-9963-3. Epub 5 June 2008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Breitenstein S, Nocito A, Puhan M, Held U, Weber M, Clavien PA. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a case-matched control study. Ann Surg. 2008;247(6):987–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Byrd JK, Smith KJ, de Almeida JR, Albergotti WG, Davis KS, Kim SW, Johnson JT, Ferris RL, Duvvuri U. Transoral robotic surgery and the unknown primary: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;150(6):976–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Broome JT, Pomeroy S, Solorzano CC. Expense of robotic thyroidectomy: a cost analysis at a single institution. Arch Surg. 2012;147(12):1102–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jackson NR, Yao L, Tufano RP, Kandil EH. Safety of robotic thyroidectomy approaches: meta-analysis and systematic review. Head Neck. 2014;36(1):137–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Weinstein GS, Quon H, Newman HJ, Chalian JA, Malloy K, Lin A, Desai A, Livolsi VA, Montone KT, Cohen KR, O’Malley BW. Transoral robotic surgery alone for oropharyngeal cancer: an analysis of local control. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;138(7):628–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Leonhardt FD, Quon H, Abrahão M, O’Malley Jr BW, Weinstein GS. Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal carcinoma and its impact on patient-reported quality of life and function. Head Neck. 2012;34(2):146–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Weinstein GS, O’Malley Jr BW, Cohen MA, Quon H. Transoral robotic surgery for advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;136(11):1079–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scharukh Jalisi M.D., M.A., F.A.C.S. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jalisi, S., Piracha, S. (2015). Costs Versus Outcomes of Robotic Surgery of the Head and Neck. In: Grillone, G., Jalisi, S. (eds) Robotic Surgery of the Head and Neck. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1547-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1547-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1546-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1547-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics