Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Scale Elasticity in Non-parametric DEA Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Data Envelopment Analysis

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 221))

Abstract

This contribution is an attempt to make an exhaustive critical review of various possible estimation methods of scale economies in a non-parametric data envelopment analysis approach. Three types of technology structure—piecewise linear, piecewise log-linear, and FDH—are found to be adopted for such estimation exercise. These technology structures are built up either in input-output space or in cost-output space. The strengths and weaknesses of the uses of each of these estimation methods are discussed. The issue of which method to use in any empirical application is a matter of an examination of various issues concerning (1) whether factor inputs are indivisible, (2) whether price data are available, and if available, whether they are well measured with certainty, and (3) whether the non-convexities in the underlying production technology are present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afriat S (1972) Efficiency estimation of production functions. Int Econ Rev 13:568–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker RD, Maindiratta A (1986) Piecewise loglinear estimation of efficient production surfaces. Manage Sci 32:126–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker RD, Thrall RM (1992) Estimation of returns to scale using data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 62:74–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci 30:1078–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker RD, Conrad RF, Straus RP (1986) A comparative application of data envelopment analysis and translog methods: an illustrative study of hospital production. Manage Sci 32:30–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker RD, Bardhan I, Cooper WW (1996a) A note on returns to scale in DEA. Eur J Oper Res 88:583–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker RD, Chang H, Cooper WW (1996b) Equivalence and implementation of alternative methods for determining returns to scale in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 89:473–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker RD, Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Thrall RM, Zhu J (2004) Returns to scale in different DEA models. Eur J Oper Res 154:345–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu S, Fernald JG (1997) Returns to scale in us production: estimates and implications. J Political Econ 105:249–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol WJ, Panzar JC, Willig RD (1982) Contestable markets and theory of industrial structure. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Borland J, Yang X (1995) Specialization, product development, evolution of the institution of the firm, and economic growth. J Evolut Econ 5:19–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouhnik S, Golany B, Passy S, Hackman ST, Vlatsa DA (2001) Lower bound restrictions on intensities in data envelopment analysis. J Prod Anal 16:241–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briec W, Liang QB (2011) On some semilattice structures for production technologies. Eur J Oper Res 215:740–749

    Google Scholar 

  • Briec W, Kerstens K, Leleu H, Vanden Eeckaut P (2000) Returns to scale on nonparametric deterministic technologies: simplifying goodness-of-fit methods using operationson technologies. J Prod Anal 14:267–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briec W, Kerstens K, Vanden Eeckaut P (2004) Non-convex technologies and cost functions: definitions, duality and nonparametric tests of convexity. J Econ 81:155–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camanho AS, Dyson RG (2005) Cost efficiency measurement with price uncertainty: a DEA application to bank branch assessments. Eur J Oper Res 161:432–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camanho AS, Dyson RG (2008) A generalization of the Farrell cost efficiency measure applicable to non-fully competitive settings. Omega 36:147–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlin EH (1933) The theory of monopolistic competition: a reorientation of the theory of value. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers RG, Chung Y, Färe R (1996) Benefit and distance functions. J Econ Theory 70:407–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers RG, Chung Y, Färe R (1998) Profit, directional distance functions, and Nerlovian efficiency. J Optim Theory Appl 98:351–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherchye L, Kuosmanen T, Post T (2000) “Why convexify? An assessment of convexity axioms in DEA”, Helsinki School of Economics and Business Administration Working Paper No. W-270

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherchye L, Kuosmanen T, Post T (2001) What is the economic meaning of FDH? A reply to Thrall. J Prod Anal 13:259–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross R, Färe R (2008) Farrell efficiency under value and quantity data. J Prod Anal 29:193–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devereux MB, Head AC, Lapham BJ (1996) Monopolistic competition, increasing returns, and the effects of government spending. J Money Credit Bank 28:233–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel C, Rogers JH (1996) How wide is the better? Am Econ Rev 86:1112–1125

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe R (1988) Fundamentals of production theory, lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems, vol 311. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S (1985) A non-parametric cost approach to scale efficiency. Scand J Econ 87:594–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S (2006) Resolving a strange case of efficiency. J Oper Res Soc 57:1366–1368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Primont D (1995) Multi-output production and duality: theory and application. Kluwer Academic Press, Boston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK (1985) The measurement of efficiency of production. Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing, Boston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK (1986) Scale economies and duality. J Econ 46:175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK (1988) Scale elasticity and scale efficiency. J Inst Theor Econ 144:721–729

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell MJ (1959) Convexity assumptions in theory of competitive markets. J Polit Econ 67:377–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Førsund FR (1996) On the calculation of scale elasticity in DEA models. J Prod Anal 7:283–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Førsund FR, Hjalmarsson L (2004) Calculating scale elasticity in DEA Models. J Oper Res Soc 55:1023–1038

    Google Scholar 

  • Førsund FR, Hjalmarsson L, Krivonozhko V, Utkin OB (2007) Calculation of scale elasticities in DEA models: direct and indirect approaches. J Prod Anal 28:45–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried HO, Schmidt SS, Yaisawarng S (1998) Productive, scale and scope efficiencies in U.S. hospital-based nursing homes. INFOR 36:103–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch R (1965) Theory of production. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama H (2000) Returns to scale and scale elasticity in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 125:93–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama H (2001) Returns to scale and scale elasticity in Farrell, Russell and additive models. J Prod Anal 16:225–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama H (2003) Scale characterizations in a DEA directional technology distance function framework. Eur J Oper Res 144:108–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama H, Weber WL (2004) Economic inefficiency measurement of input spending when decision-making units face different input prices. J Oper Res Soc 55:1102–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golany B, Yu G (1997) Estimating returns to scale in DEA. Eur J Oper Res 103:28–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosskopf S, Yaisawarng S (1990) Economies of scope in the provision of local public services. Nat Tax J 43:61–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosskopf S, Hayes K, Yaisawarng S (1987) Measuring economies of scope in farming: two alternative approaches, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale Discussion Paper, No. 87-14

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadjicostas P, Soteriou AC (2006) One-sided elasticities and technical efficiency in multi-output production: a theoretical framework. Eur J Oper Res 168:425–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanoch G (1970) Homotheticity in joint production. J Econ Theory 2:423–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanoch G, Rothschild M (1972) Testing assumptions in production theory: a nonparametric approach. J Polit Econ 80:256–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones CI (2004) Growth and ideas. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kerstens K, Vanden Eeckaut P (1999) Estimating returns to sale using non-parametric technologies: a new method based on goodness-of-fit. Eur J Oper Res 113:206–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuosmanen T (2003) Duality theory of non-convex technologies. J Prod Anal 20:273–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuosmanen T, Cherchye L, Sipilainen T (2006) The law of one price in data envelopment analysis: restricting weight flexibility across firms. Eur J Oper Res 170:735–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall JJ (1967) Competitive production for constant risk utility functions. Rev Econ Stud 34:417–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehdiloozad M, Sahoo BK, Roshdi I (2014) A generalized multiplicative directional distance function for efficiency measurement in DEA. Eur J Oper Res 232(3):679–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison CJ (1992) Unraveling the productivity growth slowdown in the United States, Canada and Japan: the effects of subequilibrium, scale economies and markups. Rev Econ Statist 74:381–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olesen OB, Petersen NC (2013) Imposing the regular Ultra Passum Law in DEA models. Omega 41:16–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Panzar JC, Willig RD (1977) Economies of scale in multi-output production. Q J Econ XLI:481–493

    Google Scholar 

  • Podinovski VV, Førsund FR (2010) Differential characteristics of efficient frontiers in data envelopment analysis. Oper Res 58:1743–1754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podinovski VV, Førsund FR, Krivonozhko VE (2009) A simple derivation of scale elasticity in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 197:149–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson J (1933) The economics of imperfect competition. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg N (1963) Technological change in the machine tool industry, 1840–1910. J Econ Hist 23:414–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg N (1981) Why in America? In: Mayr O, Post RC (eds) Yankee Enterprise, the rise of the American system of manufactures. Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo BK (2008) A non-parametric approach to measuring short-run expansion path. J Quant Econ 6:137–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo BK, Gstach D (2011) Scale economies in Indian commercial banking sector: evidence from DEA and translog estimates. Int J Inf Syst Soc Change 2:13–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo BK, Tone K (2009a) Decomposing capacity utilization in data envelopment analysis: an application to banks in India. Eur J Oper Res 195:575–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo BK, Tone K (2009b) Radial and non-radial decompositions of profit change: with an application to Indian banking. Eur J Oper Res 196:1130–1146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo BK, Tone K (2013) Non-parametric measurement of economies of scale and scope in non-competitive environment with price uncertainty. Omega 41:97–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo BK, Mohapatra PKJ, Trivedi ML (1999) A comparative application of data envelopment analysis and frontier translog production function for estimating returns to scale and efficiencies. Int J Syst Sci 30:379–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo BK, Sengupta JK, Mandal A (2007) Productive performance evaluation of the banking sector in India using data envelopment analysis. Int J Oper Res 4:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo BK, Kerstens K, Tone K (2012) Returns to growth in a non-parametric DEA approach. Int Trans Oper Res 19:463–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo BK, Sengupta JK (2014) Neoclassical characterization of returns to scale in nonparametric production analysis. J Quant Econ 12(1):77–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo BK, Mehdiloozad M, Tone K (2014a) Cost, revenue and profit efficiency measurement in DEA: a directional distance function approach. Eur J Oper Res. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2014.02.017

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo BK, Zhu J, Tone K, Klemen BM (2014b) Decomposing technical efficiency and scale elasticity in two-stage network DEA. Eur J Oper Res 233(3):584–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandmo A (1971) On the theory of the competitive firm under price uncertainty. Am Econ Rev 61:65–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarf HE (1981a) Production sets with indivisibilities part I: generalities. Econometrica 49:1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarf HE (1981b) Production sets with indivisibilities part II: the case of two activities. Econometrica 49:395–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarf HE (1986) Neighborhood systems for production sets with indivisibilities. Econometrica 54:507–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarf HE (1994) The allocation of resources in the presence of indivisibilities. J Econ Perspect 8:111–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiford LM, Zhu J (1998) On alternative optimal solutions in the estimation of returns to scale in DEA. Eur J Oper Res 108:149–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiford LM, Zhu J (1999) An investigation of returns to scale under data envelopment analysis. Omega 27:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta JK (1999) A dynamic efficiency model using data envelopment analysis. Int J Prod Econ 62:209–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta JK (2002) Economics of efficiency measurement by the DEA approach. Appl Econ 34:1133–1139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta JK (2003) New efficiency theory: with application of data envelopment analysis. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta JK (2004a) Estimating technical change by nonparametric methods. Appl Econ 36:413–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta JK (2004b) The survivor technique and the cost frontier: a nonparametric approach. Int J Product Econ 87:185–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta JK (2005a) Nonparametric efficiency analysis under uncertainty using data envelopment analysis. Int J Prod Econ 95:39–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta JK (2005b) Data envelopment analysis with heterogeneous data: an application. J Oper Res Soc 56:676–686

    Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta JK, Sahoo BK (2006) Efficiency models in data envelopment analysis: techniques of evaluation of productivity of firms in a growing economy. Palgrave Macmillan, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shi H, Yang X (1995) A new theory of industrialization. J Compar Econ 20:171–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silberston ZA (1972) Economies of scale in theory and practice. Econ J 82:369–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokoloff KL (1988) Inventive activity in early industrial America: evidence from patent records. J Econ Hist 48:813–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starrett DA (1977) Measuring returns to scale in the aggregate and the scale effect of public goods. Econometrica 45:1439–1455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sueyoshi T (1997) Measuring efficiencies and returns to scale in nippon telegraph and telephone in production and cost analysis. Manage Sci 43:779–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sueyoshi T (1999) DEA duality on Returns to Scale (RTS) in production and cost analyses: an occurrence of multiple solutions and differences between production-based and cost-based RTS estimates. Manage Sci 45:1593–1608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sueyoshi T, Sekitani K (2007a) Measurement of returns to scale using non-radial DEA model: a range-adjusted measure approach. Eur J Oper Res 176:1918–1946

    Google Scholar 

  • Sueyoshi T, Sekitani K (2007b) The measurement of returns to scale under a simultaneous occurrence of multiple solutions in a reference set and a supporting hyperplane. Eur J Oper Res 181:549–570

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrall RM (1999) What is the economic meaning of FDH? J Prod Anal 11:243–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tone K (2001) On returns to scale under weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis. J Productiv Anal 16:31–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tone K (2002) A strange case of cost and allocative efficiencies in DEA. J Oper Res Soc 53:1225–1231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tone K, Sahoo BK (2003) Scale, indivisibilities and production function in data envelopment analysis. Int J Prod Econ 84:165–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tone K, Sahoo BK (2004) Degree of scale economies and congestion: a unified DEA approach. Eur J Oper Res 158:755–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tone K, Sahoo BK (2005) Evaluating cost efficiency and returns to scale in the life insurance corporation of india using data envelopment analysis. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 39:261–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tone K, Sahoo BK (2006) Re-examining scale elasticity in DEA. Ann Oper Res 145:69–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulkens H (1993) On FDH analysis: some methodological issues and applications to retail banking, courts and urban transit. J Prod Anal 4:183–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulkens H, Vanden Eeckaut P (1995) Non-parametric efficiency, progress and regress measures for panel data: methodological aspects. Eur J Oper Res 80:474–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varian HR (1984) The nonparametric approach to production analysis. Econometrica 52:279–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X (1994) Endogeneous vs. exogeneous comparative advantage and economics of specialization vs. economies of scale. J Econ 60:29–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Ng YK (1993) Specialization and economic organization. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Rice R (1994) An equilibrium model endogenizing the emergence of a dual structure between the urban and rural sectors. J Urban Econ 35:346–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarepisheh M, Khorram E, Jahanshahloo GR (2010) Returns to scale in multiplicative models in data envelopment analysis. Ann Oper Res 173:195–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelenyuk V (2013) A scale elasticity measures for directional distance function and its dual: theory and DEA estimation. Eur J Oper Res 228(3):592–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu J (2000) Setting scale efficient targets in DEA via returns to scale estimation methods. J Oper Res Soc 51:376–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu J, Shen Z-H (1995) A discussion of testing DMUs’ returns to scale. Eur J Oper Res 81:590–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Xavier Institute of Management, Xavier Square, 751013, Bhubaneswar, India

    Biresh K. Sahoo

  2. National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies, 7-22-1 Roppongi, Minato-ku, 106-8677, Tokyo, Japan

    Kaoru Tone

Authors
  1. Biresh K. Sahoo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kaoru Tone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Biresh K. Sahoo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA

    Joe Zhu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sahoo, B., Tone, K. (2015). Scale Elasticity in Non-parametric DEA Approach. In: Zhu, J. (eds) Data Envelopment Analysis. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 221. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7553-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation