Skip to main content
  • 71 Accesses

Abstract

Many couples have difficulty negotiating a divorce settlement on their own because they get defensive and start to argue the moment they disagree. Open communication breaks down and deteriorates into accusations and counteraccusations. The couple get sidetracked into arguing over whose fault it is, often losing sight of the problem at hand. Mediators are a bit like traffic cops: they direct the flow of dialogue to control angry outbursts, interruptions, accusations, and inflammatory remarks. By enforcing ground rules and bringing structure to the discussions, by paraphrasing contentious remarks, and by permitting one person to speak at a time, the mediator steers parties on a positive course. The mediator’s ability to successfully control destructive and hurtful communication is crucial. Disputants are more willing to listen to each other when they are not under attack. When they listen to each other, understanding is increased; with more understanding comes less blaming; with less blaming comes more of a willingness to be fair; and with a willingness to be fair comes the possibility of rational and creative solutions. The mediator helps people talk to each other without letting all of the emotional baggage get in the way.

He catches the best fish who angles with a golden hook.

Latin Proverb

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Christine Leick, “Guidelines for Mediation/Attorney Cooperation,” Mediation Quarterly 23 (Spring 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jessica Pearson and Nancy Thoennes, “Divorce Mediation: Reflections on a Decade of Research” Joan Kelly and Lynn Gigy, “Divorce Mediation: Characteristics of Clients and Outcomes,” in Mediation Research: The Process and Effectiveness of Third Party Interventions, ed. K. Kressel and D. Pruitt (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Joan B. Kelly, “Mediated and Adversarial Divorce Resolution Process: An Analysis of Post Divorce Outcomes,” Final Report prepared for the Fund for Research in Dispute Resolution (Dec. 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Joan B. Kelly, “Mediated and Adversarial Divorce Resolution Process”; Jessica Pearson, “Equity of Mediated Divorce Agreements,” Mediation Quarterly 9 (Winter 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Joan B. Kelly, “Mediated and Adversarial Divorce Resolution Process.”

    Google Scholar 

  6. It is beyond the scope of this chapter to deal with this complex and difficult issue. I refer you to Steve Erickson and Marilyn McKnight, “Mediating Spousal Abuse Cases,” Mediation Quarterly 7, no. 4 (Summer 1990) to see under what circumstances it would be appropriate to mediate when there has been abuse and how the abuse issues would be handled. This entire issue of Mediation Quarterly is on the topic of mediation and family violence.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Lois Gold

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gold, L. (1992). Mediation. In: Between Love and Hate. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6582-0_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6582-0_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-44132-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-6582-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics