Skip to main content

Using Traits to Construct Personality

  • Chapter
Personality Psychology

Abstract

This chapter is about the way traits are used in personality descriptions. My research is concerned with what traits mean, both in isolation and in combination. It is grounded in a constructivist view of personality, which is an example of the broader social-constructivist movement in psychology (Gergen, 1985; Landman & Manis, 1983). According to this view, socially constructed concepts (e.g., “madness,” “childhood,” and “aging”) are composed of attributes in the real world and the social significance attached to them. Personality may also be thought of as a social creation based on behaviors and the social meanings attached to them (Hampson, 1988).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, N.H. (1968). Likeableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 272–279.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Asch, S.E., and Zukier, H. (1984). Thinking about persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1230–1240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borkenau, P. (1986). Toward an understanding of trait interrelations: Acts as instances for several traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 371–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borkenau, P., and Ostendorf, F. (1987). Retrospective estimates of act frequencies: How accurately do they reflect reality? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 626–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D.M., and Craik, K.H. (1983). The act of frequency approach to personality.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psychological Review, 90,105–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, N., and Kihlstrom, J.K. (1987). Personality and social intelligence. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. (1973). Patterns of personality judgment. New York: Academic Press. Cornbach, L.J., and Gleser, G.C. (1957). Psychological tests and personnel decisions. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K.J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40, 266–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K.L., Hepburn, A., and Corner Fisher, D. (1986). Hermeneutics of personality description. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1261–1270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampson, S.E. (1982). Person memory: A semantic category model of personality traits. British Journal of Psychology, 73, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampson, S.E. (1988). The Construction of Personality: An Introduction ( 2nd ed. ). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampson, S.E., Goldberg, L.R., and John, O.P. (1987). Category breadth and social desirability values for 573 personality terms. European Journal of Personality Psychology, 1, 241–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampson, S.E., John, O.P., and Goldberg, L.R. (1986). Category breadth and hierarchical structure in personality: Studies of asymmetries in judgments of trait implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 37–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • John, O.P., Hampson, S.E., and Goldberg, L.R. (1989). Is there a basic level of personality description? Unpublished manuscript, Oregon Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landman, J., and Manis, M. (1983). Social cognition: Some historical and theoretical perspectives. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 16, pp. 49–123 ). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W., and Peake, P.K. (1982). Beyond deja vu in the search for cross-situational consistency. Psychological Review, 89, 730–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peabody, D., (1967). Trait inferences: Evaluative and descriptive aspects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph, 7 (4, Whole No. 644).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E., Mervis, C.B., Gray, W.D., Johnson, D., and Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, M., and Swann, W.B., Jr. (1978). Hypothesis-testing processes in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1202–1212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, M. (1984). When beliefs create reality. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 18, pp. 247–305 ). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swann, W.B. (1987). Identity negotiation: Where two roads meet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1038–1051.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hampson, S.E. (1989). Using Traits to Construct Personality. In: Buss, D.M., Cantor, N. (eds) Personality Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-0634-4_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-0634-4_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-0636-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-0634-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics