Summary
The use of nonrenewable energy sources (oil, gas, coal) in industrial countries is not sustainable because these resources will soon be depleted and, more importantly, burning these resources changes the earth’s atmosphere and climate. Therefore, sustainable alternatives are urgently needed In addition to wind, water, and solar energy, biomass is an excellent energy source, especially in rural areas. Although the technical solutions for converting biomass into heat and electricity are available, this energy source is still not widely used in industrial countries. The social sciences, and especially psychology, can play an important role by demonstrating that corresponding changes may be initiated by people themselves, and that these changes may be accompanied by positive psychological outcomes. This chapter describes a research project, sponsored by the German Ministry for Agriculture, which aims to change the energy source of an entire German village to biomass. Psychologically relevant literature is reviewed and the specific expectationsfor changes in psychological variables (control beliefs, environmental attitudes, well-being) are reported.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ammann, F., Mosler, H.-J., & Gutscher, H. (1997). Wie wirkt Überzeugungsarbeit in einer Population entsprechend Umweltbetroffenheit, Umweltwissen und vorhandener Voreingenommenheit? [How to convince people regarding environmental concern,s knowledge about environment and prejudice?]. In R. Kaufmann-Hayoz (Ed.), Allgemeine Ökologie zur Diskussion gestellt. Bedingungen umweltverantwortlichen Handelns von Individuen (pp. 91–99) [General ecology and conditions of environmentally responsible behavior]. Bern: IKAOE.
Aronson, E. & O’Leary, M. (1983). The relative effectiveness of models and prompts on energy conservation: A field experiment in a shower room. Journal of Environmental Systems, 12, 219–224.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122–147.
Baumeister, R. F. & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for Interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.
Bengel, J., Strittmatter, R., & Willmann, H. (1998). Was erhalt Menschen gesund? Antonovskys Modell der Salutogenese — Diskussionsstand und Stellenwert [What keeps people healthy? Discussion of Antonovsky’s model of salutogenesis]. Forschung und Praxis der Gesundheitsförderung, Vol. 6. Köln: Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung
Bum, S. M. & Oskamp, S. (1986). Increasing community recycling with persuasive communication and public committment. Journal ofApplied Social Psychology, 16, 1, 29–41.
Centrale Marketing-Gesellschaft der Deutschen Agrarwirtschaft mbH (Ed.) (1997). Biomasse — nachwachsende Energie aus Land-und Forstwirtschaft [Biomass — regenerating energy from agriculture and forestry]. Bonn.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1993). The Evolving Self. A psychology for the third millenium. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.
Diekmann, A. & Jann, B. (2000). Sind die empirischen Ergebnisse zum Umweltverhalten Artefakte? Ein Beitrag zum Problem der Messung von Umweltverhalten [Are empirical results regarding environmentally relevant behavior artifacts?]. Umweltpsychologie, 4, 1, 64–75.
Fischer, A. & Kallen, C. (1995). (Ed.). Erfolgsbedingungen für kommunale Energie-und Klimaschutzkonzepte [Conditions for the success of local climate protection and energy supplying concepts]. Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Urbanistik.
Flavin, C. (2001). Rich planet, poor planet. In L. Starke, (Ed.), State of the World 2001 (pp. 3–20). New York: W W Norton & Company.
Gonzales, M. H., Aronson, E., & Costanzo, M. A. (1988). Using social cognition and persuasion to promote energy conservation: A quasiexperiment. Journal ofApplied Social Psychology, 18, 1049–1066.
Haberl, H. (2000). Energetischer Stoffwechsel und nachhaltige Entwicklung [Energetic metabolism and sustainable development]. Natur und Kultur, 1, 32–47.
Hennicke, P., Jochem, E., & Prose, F. (1997). Interdisziplinäre Analyse der Umsetzungschancen einer Energiespar-und Klimaschutzpolitik [Interdisciplinary analysis of the chances of an energy saving and climate protection policy]. Karlsruhe, Kiel, Wuppertal: Forschungsbericht.
Henry, K. B., Arrow, H. & Carini, B. (1999). A tripartite model of group identification — Theory and measurement. Small Group Research, 30, 558–581.
Herzog, M. (1997). Psychologische und ökonomische Aspekte bei der Förderung von regenerativen Energieträgern [Psychological and economical aspects in fostering regenerative energies]. Frankfurt: Lang.
Jungk, R. & Müllert, N. R. (1983). Zukunftswerkstätten [Future workshops]. Miinchen: Goldmann.
Krampen, G. (1982). Differentialpsychologie der Kontrollüberzeugungen [Differential psychology of control beliefs]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Meyer-Abich, K. (1998). Warum machen wir das eigentlich? Erkenntnisideale und erkenntnisleitende Gefühle in der Naturwissenschaft [Why do we do it? Ideals and emotions directing recognition in natural science]. In L. Honnefelder & C. Streffer (Eds.), Jahrbuch für Wissenschafl und Ethik [Almanac for science and ethics], Vol 3. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Mienecke, W.H.W. & Midden, H.J. (1991). Communication network influences on information diffusion and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 734–742.
Mosler, H.-J. (1998). Umweltpsychologische Interventionsformen für die Praxis [Psychological interventions for the practice of guarding the environment]. Umweltpsychologie, 2, 2, 64–79.
Podobnik, B. (1999). Toward a sustainable energy regime. A long wave interpretation of global energy shifts. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 62, 155–172.
Rotter, J. R. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monograph, 80.
Rotter, J. R. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. New York: Englewood Cliffs.
Ryff, C. D. & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological wellbeing revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–727.
Schahn, J., Damian, M., Schurig, U., & Füchsle, C. (1999). Konstruktion und Evaluation der dritten Version des Skalensystems zur Erfassung des Umweltbewusstseins (SEU-3) [Construction and evaluation of the third version of a scale for measuring environmental awareness]. Diagnostica, 46, 84–92.
Scherhom, G., Hellenthal, F., & Schroedl, S. (1999). Umweltschonung als kollektive Aktion [Caring for the environment as a collective action]. Umweltpsychologie, 3, 48–55.
Schindler, J. & Zittel, W. (2000). Vom Öl zur Sonne [From oil to sun]. Natur und Kultur, 1, 48–70.
Schmittknecht, I. (1998). Klimaschutz-Forum für kleine Kommunen. Dokumentation der Workshops in Osnabriick und Wernigerode, 1998 [Protection of climate in small communities]. Deutsche UmwelthilfelKlimabündnis Alianza del Clima: Krammer.
Schmuck, P. & Sheldon, K. (Eds.), (2001). Life goals and well-being. Towards a positive psychology of human striving. Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
Schmuck, P., Eigner, S., Krapoth, S., & Kaufhold, A. (1997). Wie kommen Menschen zu ganzheitlichem Denken und Handeln? Ein psychologischer Annaherungsversuch über biographische Analysen und ein Interview mit dem Nobelpreisträger Ilya Prigogine [How poeple approach holistic thinking and acting? Biographical analyzes and an interview with the Nobel prize winner I1ya Prigogine]. Göttingen: Schriftenreihe des Koordinations-und Studienzentrums Frieden und Umwelt, Vol. 9.
Sheldon, K., Schmuck, P., & Kasser, T. (2000). Is value free science possible? American Psychologist, 55, 1152–1153.
Schuster, K. & Marx, R. (1998). Sozialwissenschaftliche Evaluation des Förderprogramms Biomasse [Social scientific evaluation of a program fostering biomass]. Endbericht der Energiestiftung Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Eigner, S., Schmuck, P. (2002). Motivating Collective Action: Converting to Sustainable Energy Sources in a German Community. In: Schmuck, P., Schultz, W.P. (eds) Psychology of Sustainable Development. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0995-0_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0995-0_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5342-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0995-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive