Abstract
In this chapter, the heating and hot water demands of a North American residence are assessed and compared. Five specific systems are analyzed: ground and air source heat pumps, stand-alone PV, PV–fuel cell hybrid, and a wind turbine–fuel cell hybrid system. They are compared with traditional sources of energy such as natural gas, coal, and fuel oil. From the results, although renewable sources have no CO2 emissions, heat pump systems have significant cost advantages over the other systems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dorer V, Weber R, Weber A (2005) Performance assessment of fuel cell micro-cogeneration systems for residential buildings. Energ Build 37:1132–1146
El-Shatter TF, Eskandar MN, El-Hagry MT (2002) Hybrid PV/fuel cell system design and simulation. Renew Energy 27:479–485
Sahin AD, Dincer I, Rosen MA (2007) Thermodynamic analysis of solar photovoltaic cell systems. Sol Energ Mater Sol Cell 91:153–159
Sahin AD, Dincer I, Rosen MA (2006) Thermodynamic analysis of wind energy. Int J Energ Res 30:553–566
Ozlu S, Dincer I, Naterer GF (2012) Comparative assessment of residential energy options in Ontario, Canada. Energ Build 55:674–684
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ozlu, S., Dincer, I., Naterer, G.F. (2013). Comparative Assessment of Costs and CO2 Emissions for Various Residential Energy Options. In: Dincer, I., Colpan, C., Kadioglu, F. (eds) Causes, Impacts and Solutions to Global Warming. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7588-0_62
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7588-0_62
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7587-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7588-0
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)