Skip to main content

Lung Cancer Screening and the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Interventions in Pulmonary Medicine

Abstract

Lung cancer remains the most common cause of cancer-related deaths in the USA and worldwide. An estimated 220,000 new cases are diagnosed, while nearly 160,000 patients die from lung cancer each year in the USA alone, accounting for more cancer-related deaths than the next three most common cancers combined: colon, breast, and prostate [Jemal A et al., CA Cancer J Clin 61:69–9, 2011; Siegel R et al., CA Cancer J Clin 61:212–6, 2011]. In spite of major advances achieved in lung cancer diagnosis, medical, surgical treatment, and palliative care, the overall 5-year survival for lung cancer has not noticeably changed over the past 20 years and is estimated around 16 % [Goldstraw P et al., J Thorac Oncol 2:706–14, 2007]. These dismal statistics compare poorly with those of other common cancers such as colon, breast, and prostate cancers characterized by 5-year survival rates of 65 %, 88 % and 99 %, respectively. Among the many potential explanations advanced to explain such differences, the lack of effective screening for lung cancer is often contrasted to what are generally assumed and accepted screening strategies for those other malignancies. Lung cancer is in the majority of cases diagnosed at advanced stages, as symptoms prompt patients to seek medical attention, when curative therapeutic options are at best limited.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Siegel R, Ward E, Brawley O, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2011: the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:212–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Goldstraw P, Crowley J, Chansky K, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM Classification of malignant tumours. J Thorac Oncol. 2007;2:706–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cole P, Morrison AS. Basic issues in population screening for cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1980;64:1263–72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:395–409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fontana RS, Sanderson DR, Taylor WF, et al. Early lung cancer detection: results of the initial (prevalence) radiologic and cytologic screening in the Mayo Clinic study. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1984;130:561–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Frost JK, Ball Jr WC, Levin ML, et al. Early lung cancer detection: results of the initial (prevalence) radiologic and cytologic screening in the Johns Hopkins study. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1984;130:549–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Melamed MR, Flehinger BJ, Zaman MB, Heelan RT, Perchick WA, Martini N. Screening for early lung cancer. Results of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering study in New York. Chest. 1984;86:44–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Marcus PM, Bergstralh EJ, Fagerstrom RM, et al. Lung cancer mortality in the Mayo Lung Project: impact of extended follow-up. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1308–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ebeling K, Nischan P. Screening for lung cancer–results from a case–control study. Int J Cancer. 1987;40:141–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nishii K, Ueoka H, Kiura K, et al. A case–control study of lung cancer screening in Okayama Prefecture, Japan. Lung Cancer. 2001;34:325–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Okamoto N, Suzuki T, Hasegawa H, et al. Evaluation of a clinic-based screening program for lung cancer with a case–control design in Kanagawa, Japan. Lung Cancer. 1999;25:77–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sagawa M, Tsubono Y, Saito Y, et al. A case–control study for evaluating the efficacy of mass screening program for lung cancer in Miyagi Prefecture, Japan. Cancer. 2001;92:588–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tsukada H, Kurita Y, Yokoyama A, et al. An evaluation of screening for lung cancer in Niigata Prefecture, Japan: a population-based case–control study. Br J Cancer. 2001;85:1326–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Oken MM, Marcus PM, Hu P, et al. Screening by chest radiograph and lung cancer mortality: the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) randomized trial. JAMA. 2011;306(17):1865–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Baker SG, Kramer BS, Prorok PC. Statistical issues in randomized trials of cancer screening. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2002;2:11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yau G, Lock M, Rodrigues G. Systematic review of baseline low-dose CT lung cancer screening. Lung Cancer. 2007;58:161–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Libby DM, Pasmantier MW, Smith JP, Miettinen OS. Survival of patients with stage I lung cancer detected on CT screening. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1763–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bach PB, Jett JR, Pastorino U, Tockman MS, Swensen SJ, Begg CB. Computed tomography screening and lung cancer outcomes. JAMA. 2007;297:953–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. McMahon PM, Kong CY, Johnson BE, et al. Estimating long-term effectiveness of lung cancer screening in the Mayo CT screening study. Radiology. 2008;248:278–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kalager M, Zelen M, Langmark F, Adami HO. Effect of screening mammography on breast-cancer mortality in Norway. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1203–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ost DE, Gould MK. Decision making in the patient with pulmonary nodules. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;185(4):363–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lindell RM, Hartman TE, Swensen SJ, et al. Five-year lung cancer screening experience: CT appearance, growth rate, location, and histologic features of 61 lung cancers. Radiology. 2007;242:555–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Swensen SJ, Jett JR, Hartman TE, et al. CT screening for lung cancer: five-year prospective experience. Radiology. 2005;235:259–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Detterbeck FC, Gibson CJ. Turning gray: the natural history of lung cancer over time. J Thorac Oncol. 2008;3:781–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bach PB. Is our natural-history model of lung cancer wrong? Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:693–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bach PB. Lung cancer screening. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2008;6:271–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M, et al. International association for the study of lung cancer/American thoracic society/European respiratory society international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol. 2011;6:244–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric S. Edell M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maldonado, F., Edell, E.S. (2013). Lung Cancer Screening and the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST). In: Díaz-Jimenez, J., Rodriguez, A. (eds) Interventions in Pulmonary Medicine. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6009-1_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6009-1_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6008-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6009-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics