Skip to main content

Measures of Reading Achievement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Assessing Literacy in Deaf Individuals

Abstract

This chapter presents the data related to reading skills for the VL2 Psychometric Toolkit Project. The data were generated using multiple reading tasks, including Reading Fluency and Paragraph Comprehension from the Woodcock-Johnson III (WJ-III) Tests of Achievement as well as the Reading Comprehension from the Peabody Individual Achievement Test-Revised (PIAT-R) and the Test of Silent Word Reading Fluency (TOSWRF). The sample was comprised of deaf college students evaluated as part of the VL2 Psychometric Toolkit. In addition to providing descriptive statistics, correlations with a brief measure of nonverbal intelligence and measures of executive, visuospatial, memory, and linguistic functioning and other areas of academic achievement administered concurrently as part of the VL2 Toolkit are presented. The relationships observed are discussed in the context of both research in the general population and, when available, previous research with deaf individuals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, T. E. (1994). Who are the deaf and hard-of-hearing students leaving high school and entering postsecondary education? Paper submitted to Pelavin Research Institute as part of the project, A comprehensive evaluation of postsecondary educational opportunities for students who are deaf or hard of hearing. Available at http://research.gallaudet.edu/AnnualSurvey/whodeaf.php

  • Allen, T. E., Clark, M. D., delGiudice, A., Koo, D., Lieberman, A., Mayberry, R., et al. (2009). Phonology and reading: A response to Wang, Trezek, Luckner, and Paul. American Annals of the Deaf, 154(4), 338–345.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anita, S. D., Jones, P. B., Reed, S., & Kreimeyer, K. H. (2009). Academic status and progress of deaf and hard-of-hearing students in general education classrooms. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 14(3), 293–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P., & Brewer, L. (1996). Cognitive processes of deaf and hearing skilled and less skilled readers. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 1(4), 263–270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, C., & Mayberry, R. I. (2008). ASL syntactic and narrative comprehension in skilled and less skilled adult readers: Bilingual-bimodal evidence for the linguistic basis of reading. Applied PsychoLinguistics, 29, 368–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, R. (1970). Short-term memory processes in the deaf. British Journal of Psychology, 61(2), 179–185.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DesJardin, J. L., Ambrose, S. E., & Eisenberg, L. S. (2009). Literacy skills in children with cochlear implants: The importance of early oral language and joint storybook reading. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 14(1), 22–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Furth, H. G. (1966). Thinking without language. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haptonstall-Nykaza, T. S., & Schick, B. (2007). The transition from fingerspelling to English print: Facilitating English decoding. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 12, 172–183. doi:10.1093/deafed/enm003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, J. (1993). Stanford Achievement Test–8th Edition: Reading comprehension subgroup results. American Annals of the Deaf, 138(2), 172–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, J. A., Traxler, C. B., & Allen, T. E. (1997). Interpreting the scores: A user’s guide to the 9th Edition Stanford Achievement Test for educators of deaf and hard-of-hearing students. Washington, DC: Gallaudet Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karchmer, M. A., & Mitchell, R. E. (2003). Demographic and achievement characteristics of deaf and hard-of-hearing students. In M. Marschark & P. E. Spencer (Eds.), Deaf studies, language, and education (pp. 21–37). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearly, D. J. (2008). Eye movements of deaf readers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Gallaudet University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, L. (1996). The interaction of syntactic competence and vocabulary during reading by deaf students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 1(1), 75–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, L. (2003a). Considerations for designing practice for deaf readers. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 8(2), 171–186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, L. (2003b). The importance of processing automaticity and temporary storage capacity to the differences in comprehension between skilled and less skilled college-age deaf readers. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 8(3), 230–249.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koo, D., Crain, K., LaSasso, C., & Eden, G. (2008). Phonological awareness and short-term memory in hearing and deaf individuals of different communication backgrounds. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1145, 83–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kyle, F. E., & Harris, M. (2011). Longitudinal patterns of emerging literacy in beginning deaf and hearing readers. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 16(3), 289–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linacre, J. M. (1994). Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 7(4), 328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markwardt, F. C. (1998). Peabody Individual Achievement Test—Revised normative update. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschark, M., & Harris, M. (1996). Success and failure in learning to read: The special case (?) of deaf children. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention (pp. 279–300). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschark, M., Sapere, P., Convertino, C., Mayer, C., Wauters, L., & Sarchet, T. (2009). Are deaf students’ reading challenges really about reading? American Annals of the Deaf, 15(4), 357–370. doi:10.1353/aad.0.0111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marschark, M., Sarchet, T., Convertino, C., Borgna, G., Morrison, C., & Remelt, S. (2012). Print exposure, reading habits, and reading achievement among deaf and hearing college students. American Annals of the Deaf, 17(1), 61–74. doi:10.1093/deafed/enr044.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, N., Hammill, D. D., Allen, E. A., & Roberts, R. (2004). Test of silent word reading fluency. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayberry, R. I., del Giudice, A. A., & Lieberman, A. M. (2011). Reading achievement in relation to phonological coding and awareness in deaf readers: A meta-analysis. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 16(2), 164–188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGrew, K. S., Schrank, F. A., & Woodcock, R. W. (2007). Technical manual, Woodcock-Johnson III normative update. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moores, D. F. (2001). Educating the deaf: Psychology, principles and practices (5th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moores, D. F. (2009). Cochlear failures. American Annals of the Deaf, 53(5), 423–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musselman, C. (2000). How do children who can’t hear learn to read an alphabetic script? A review of the literature on reading and deafness. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5(1), 9–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, D. C., Luetke, B., & Stryker, D. S. (2011). The importance of morphemic awareness to reading achievement and the potential of signing morphemes to supporting reading development. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 16(3), 275–288. doi:10.1093/deafed/enq063.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, P. V. (2003). Processes and components of reading. In M. Marschark & P. E. Spencer (Eds.), Deaf studies, language, and education (pp. 97–109). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C., & Sandak, R. (2000). Reading optimally builds on spoken language: Implications for deaf readers. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5(1), 32–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Qi, S., & Mitchell, R. E. (2012). Large-scale academic achievement testing of deaf and hard-of-hearing students: Past, present, and future. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 17(1), 1–18. doi:10.1093/deafed/enr028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quigley, S., & Kretschmer, M. (1982). The education of deaf children. London: Edward Arnold Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schirmer, B. R., & Williams, C. (2003). Approaches to teaching reading. In M. Marschark & P. E. Spencer (Eds.), Deaf studies, language, and education (pp. 110–122). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrank, F. A., Mather, N., McGrew, K. S., & Woodcock, R. W. (2003). Manual. Woodcock-Johnson III diagnostic supplement to the tests of cognitive abilities. Itasca, IL: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrank, F. A., & Woodcock, R. W. (2007). WJ III normative update compuscore and profiles program (Version 3.0) [Computer software]. Woodcock-Johnson III. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traxler, C. B. (2000). The Stanford Achievement Test, 9th Edition: National norming and performance standards for deaf and hard-of-hearing students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5, 337–348.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trezek, B. J., Wang, Y., & Paul, P. V. (2010). Reading and deafness: Theory, research and practice. Clifton Park, NY: Cengage Delmar Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trezek, B. J., Wang, Y., Woods, D. G., Gampp, T. L., & Paul, P. V. (2007). Using Visual Phonics to supplement beginning reading instruction for students who are deaf/hard of hearing. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 12(3), 373–384.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Trezek, B. J., Luckner, J. L., & Paul, P. V. (2008). The role of phonology and phonologically related skills in reading instruction for students who are deaf or hard of hearing. American Annals of the Deaf, 153(4), 396–407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, G. S., & Doehring, D. G. (1990). Reading acquisition in congenitally deaf children who communicate orally: Insights from an analysis of component reading, language, and memory skills. In T. H. Carr & B. A. Levy (Eds.), Reading and its development. San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilbur, R. P. (2000). The use of ASL to support the development of English and literacy. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5(1), 81–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Examiner’s manual. Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donna A. Morere .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Morere, D.A. (2012). Measures of Reading Achievement. In: Morere, D., Allen, T. (eds) Assessing Literacy in Deaf Individuals. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5269-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics