Abstract
Desertification in Spain is largely a society-driven problem, which can be effectively managed only through a thorough understanding of the principal ecological, sociocultural, and economic driving forces (UNCCD 1994). This calls for a more active role of decision-makers and other stakeholders. We present a promising approach, involving stakeholders in the scenario-development process and linking these narrative storylines with an integrated quantitative model. Within the framework of a larger EC-financed project, dealing with desertification in the Mediterranean region, multi-scale scenarios were developed for Europe, the Northern Mediterranean, and four local areas. In the same project, a policy-support system (PSS) was developed. The main objective of this exercise was to establish a link between the qualitative scenarios and the PSS for the watershed of the Guadalentín river in Spain. From the results of two scenario workshops, three scenarios were selected, all linked to the same Mediterranean scenario. Our selection aimed to maximize both the variety in the narrative storylines and the expected output of the PSS. The scenarios were subsequently formalized, ensuring that the same information was present for all three scenarios; semi-quantified (translated) by linking them to the main entry points of the PSS; and quantified by parameterizing the model. The results indicate the potential of the constructed quantitative scenarios. This chapter illustrates the practical potential and pitfalls of linking qualitative storylines and quantitative models. Future research should, however, also focus on the more fundamental theoretical obstacles that are easily overlooked.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alcamo, J. (2008). The SAS approach: Combining qualitative and quantitative knowledge in environmental scenarios. In J. Alcamo (Ed.), Environmental futures: The practice of environmental scenario analysis (Developments in integrated environmental assessment, Vol. 2, pp. 123–150). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Barreteau, O., Bousquet, F., & Attonaty, J. -M. (2001). Agent-based modelling, game theory and natural resource management issues, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 4(2). http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/4/2/5.html
De Groot, D., & Rotmans, J. (2004). MedAction, final report, submitted to the Research and Development Directorate, European Commission EVK2-2000-00085, Maastricht.
Dreborg, K. H. (1996). Essence of backcasting. Futures, 28, 813–828.
Kämäri, J., Alcamo, J., Bärlund, I., Duel, H., Farquharson, F., Flörke, M., Fry, M., Houghton-Carr, H., Kabat, P., Kaljonen, M., Kok, K., Meijer, K. S., Rekolainen, S., Sendzimir, S., Varjopuro, R., & Villars, N. (2008). Envisioning the future of water in Europe – the SCENES project, E-Water Journal from EWA. http://www.ewaonline.de/portale/ewa/ewa.nsf/home?reaform&objectid=37F6CB0C75D068CFC125748E004F6FDB
Kasemir, B., Dahinden, U., Swartling, Å. G., Schüle, R., Tabara, D., & Jaeger, C. C. (2000). Citizens’ perspectives on climate change and energy use. Global Environmental Change, 10, 169–184.
Kok, K. (2009). The potential of Fuzzy cognitive maps for semi-quantitative scenario development, with an example from Brazil. Global Environmental Change, 19, 122–133.
Kok, K., & Van Delden, H. (2009). Combining two approaches of integrated scenario development to combat desertification in the Guadalentín watershed, Spain. Environment and Planning B, 36, 49–66.
Kok, K., Rothman, D. S., & Patel, M. (2006a). Multi-scale narratives from an IA perspective: Part I. European and Mediterranean scenario development. Futures, 38(3), 261–284.
Kok, K., Patel, M., Rothman, D. S., & Quaranta, G. (2006b). Multi-scale narratives from an IA perspective: Part II. Participatory local scenario development. Futures, 38(3), 285–311.
Kok, K., Biggs, R., & Zurek, M. (2007). Multi-scale scenario development methodologies. Experiences from Southern Africa and the Mediterranean. Ecology and Society, 12(1), 8. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art8/
Kok, K., van Vliet, M., Bärlund, I., Dubel, A., & Sendzimir, J. (2011). Combining participative backcasting and explorative scenario development: Experiences from the SCENES project. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(5), 835–851.
Parker, D. C., Berger, T., Manson, S. M., & McConnell, W. J. (2002). Agent-based models of land-use and land-cover change. Proceedings of an International Workshop, 4–7 Oct 2001, Irvine. Report no. 6, LUCC report series, Focus 1 Office, Indiana University.
Robinson, J. (2003). Future subjunctive: Backcasting as social learning. Futures, 35, 839–856.
Roeckner, E., Arpe, K., Bengtsson, L., Christoph, M., Claussen, M., Dümenil, L., Esch, M., Giorgetta, M., Schlese, U., & Schulzweida, U. (1996). The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM-4: Model description and simulation of present-day climate, Report no. 218, Max-Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg.
Rotmans, J. (1998). Methods for IA: The challenges and opportunities ahead. Environmental Modelling and Assessment, 3, 155–179.
Rotmans, J., van Asselt, M. B. A., Anastasi, S. C. H., Greeuw, S. C. H., Mellors, J., Peters, S., Rothman, D. S., & Rijkens, N. (2000). Visions for a sustainable Europe. Futures, 32(9/10), 809–831.
UNCCD (1994). United Nations convention to combat desertification. Convention text as of September 1994. http://www.unccd.int/convention/menu.php.
Van Delden, H., Luja, P., & Engelen, G. (2007). Integration of multi-scale dynamic spatial models of socio-economic and physical processes for river basin management. Environmental Modelling and Software, 22, 223–238.
Van Vliet, M., Kok, K., & Veldkamp, T. (2010). Linking stakeholders and modellers in scenario studies: The use of fuzzy cognitive maps as a communication and learning tool. Futures, 42(1), 1–14.
Vennix, J. A. M. (1999). Group-model building: Tackling messy problems. System Dynamics Review, 15, 379–401.
White, R., Straatman, B., & Engelen, G. (2004). Planning scenario visualization and assessment: A cellular automata based integrated spatial decision support system. In M. F. Goodchild & D. Janelle (Eds.), Spatially integrated social science (pp. 420–442). New York: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix A
Appendix A
MedAction: Policies to combat desertification in the Northern Mediterranean region. Research project supported by the European Commission under the Fifth Framework Programme and contributing to the implementation of Key Action 2: Global Change, Climate and Biodiversity; Subaction 2.3.3 Fighting Land Degradation and Desertification. Research period: 2001–2004.
Website: www.icis.unimaas.nl/ medaction
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kok, K., van Delden, H. (2013). Linking Narrative Storylines and Quantitative Models to Combat Desertification in the Guadalentín Watershed (Spain). In: Giaoutzi, M., Sapio, B. (eds) Recent Developments in Foresight Methodologies. Complex Networks and Dynamic Systems, vol 1. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5215-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5215-7_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5214-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5215-7
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)