Abstract
After a general description of the structure of the long-term care system as it has historically developed in England, this chapter documents some major changes that have taken place in the organization and delivery of long-term care in England over the past two decades—specifically the introduction of quasimarkets. It also documents the failure over the same period to achieve reform in the critically important area of funding. It shows that one series of policy preoccupations—quasimarkets and choice—has been pursued so consistently and assertively over two decades by Conservative, Labour and Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition governments alike, when all have found more fundamental funding reforms much harder to achieve. Furthermore, this chapter describes the changes introduced in the institutional setting of the system in order to improve its efficiency, by supporting better collaboration between services, by introducing intermediate care services and by improving new approaches to home care. Finally, a review of the role played by diverse social and institutional actors in the revision of the system is presented as well as an interpretation of the mechanisms of change and the impact of the reforms.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The 1996 Community Care (Direct Payments) Act was passed before constitutional devolution in the UK; it therefore covered, and was implemented in, the four countries that make up the UK.
References
Association of Directors of Adult Social Services/Local Government Association (ADASS/LGA). (2003). All our tomorrows: inverting the triangle of care. London: Association of Directors of Adult Social Services/Local Government Association.
Audit Commission. (1986). Making a reality of community care. London: Audit Commission.
Audit Commission. (1997). The coming of age: Improving care services for older people. London: Audit Commission.
Audit Commission. (2000). The way to go home: Rehabilitation and remedial services for older people. London: Audit Commission.
Audit Commission. (2010). Financial management of personal budgets. London: Audit Commission.
Care Quality Commission. (2010). The state of health care and adult social care in England. Key themes and quality of services in 2009. London: Care Quality Commission. Downloaded from www.cqc.org.uk.
Carers UK. (2007). Carers save UK £87 billion per year. www.carersuk.org/Newsandcampaigns/News/1190237139. Accessed 5 Feb 2008.
Churchill, N. (Ed). (2008). Advancing opportunity: Older people and social care. London: Smith Institute.
Comas-Herrera, A., Wittenberg, R., & Pickard, L. (2004). Long-term care for older people in the United Kingdom: Structure and challenges. In M. Knapp, D. Challis, J. L. Fernández, & A. Netten (Eds.), Long-term care: Matching resources and needs. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI). (2008). The state of social care in England 2006–07. London: Commission for Social Care Inspection.
Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI). (2009). The state of social care in England 2007–08. London: Commission for Social Care Inspection.
Davey, V., Fernández, J. L., Knapp, M., Vick, N., Jolly, D., Swift, P., Tobin, R., Kendall, J., Ferrie, J., Pearson, C., Mercer, G., & Priestley, M. (2007). Direct payments: A national survey of policy and practice. London: LSE, PSSRU.
Department of Health. (1998). Modernising social services. Cm 4169. London: Department of Health.
Department of Health. (2000). The NHS Plan. A plan for investment, a plan for reform. London: Department of Health.
Department of Health. (2001a). National service framework for older people. London: Department of Health.
Department of Health. (2001b). Valuing people: A new strategy for learning disability for the 21st Century. Cm 5086. London: The Stationery Office.
Department of Health. (2004). Dramatic fall in delayed discharges. Press release 2004/0196, 17 May.
Department of Health. (2008). Putting people first: A shared vision and commitment to the transformation of adult social care. London: Department of Health.
Department of Health. (2011). Fairer care funding: The report of the commission on funding of care and support. London: Department of Health.
Department of Health and Social Security. (1988). Community care: An agenda for action. London: HMSO.
Dowling, B., Glendinning, C., & Powell, M. (2004). Conceptualising ‘successful’ partnerships. Health and Social Care in the Community, 12(4), 309–317.
Drakeford, M. (2006). Ownership, regulation and the public interest: The case of residential care for older people. Critical Social Policy, 26(4), 932–944.
Duffy, S. (2004). In control. Journal of Integrated Care, 12(6), 7–13.
Ellis, K. (2007). Direct payments and social work practice: The significance of street-level bureaucracy in determining eligibility. British Journal of Social Work, 37(3), 405–422.
Fernández, J. L., Kendall, J., Davey, V., & Knapp, M. (2007). Direct payments in England: Factors linked to variations in local provision. Journal of Social Policy, 36(1), 97–121.
Glasby, J., & Littlechild, R. (2004). The health and social care divide: The experiences of older people (Revised 2nd ed.). Bristol: The Policy Press.
Glasby, J., & Littlechild, R. (2006). An overview of the implementation and development of direct payments. In J. Leece & J. Bornat (Eds.), Developments in direct payments. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Glendinning, C. (2007). Improving equity and sustainability in UK funding for long-term care: Lessons from Germany. Social Policy and Society, 6(3), 411–422.
Glendinning, C., & Lloyd, B. (1998). The continuing care guidelines and primary and community health services. Health and Social Care in the Community, 6(3), 181–188.
Glendinning, C., & Means, R. (2004). Rearranging the deckchairs on the Titanic of long-term care – is organisational integration the answer? Critical Social Policy, 24(4), 435–457.
Glendinning, C., Hudson, B., & Means, R. (2005). Under strain? Exploring the troubled relationship between health and social care. Public Money and Management, 25(4), 245–252.
Glendinning, C., Challis, D., Fernández, J. L., Jacobs, S., Jones, K., Knapp, M., Manthorpe, J., Moran, N., Stevens, M., & Wilberforce, M. (2008). Evaluation of the individual budgets pilot programme: Final report. York: Social Policy Research Unit, University of York.
Glendinning, C., Jones, K., Baxter, K., Rabiee, P., Curtis, L., Wilde, A., Arksey, H., & Forder, J. (2010). Home care re-ablement services: Investigating the longer-term impacts (Prospective Longitudinal Study). (Working Paper No. DHR 2438). York: Social Policy Research Unit, University of York.
Glendinning, C., Moran, N., Challis, D., Fernández, J. L., Jacobs, S., Jones, K., Knapp, M., Manthorpe, J., Netten, A., Stevens, M., & Wilberforce, M. (2011). Personalisation and partnership: Competing objectives in English adult social care? the individual budget pilot projects and the NHS. Social Policy and Society, 10(2), 151–162.
Godfrey, M., Keen, J., Townsend, J., Moore, J., Ware, P., Hardy, B., West, R., Weatherly, H., & Henderson, K. (2005). An evaluation of intermediate care for older people. Final report. Leeds: Institute of Health Sciences and Public Health Research, University of Leeds.
Grimshaw, D. (2002). Qualitative research on firms’ adjustments to the minimum wage. Manchester: European Work and Employment Research Centre.
Grimshaw, D., & Carroll, M. (2006). Adjusting to the national minimum wage: Constraints and incentives to change in six low-paying sectors. Industrial Relations Journal, 37, 22–47.
House of Commons Health Committee. (2010). Social care (Third Report of Session 2009–10, Volume 1, HC 22–1). London: House of Commons.
Humphries, R., & Forder, J. (2010). Options for funding long-term care; the partnership model compared. Quality in Ageing and Older Adults, 11(4), 30–35.
Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF). (2006). Paying for long-term care. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Kasparova, D., Marsh, A., & Wilkinson, D. (2007). The take-up rate of disability living allowance and attendance allowance: Feasibility study (Research Report 442). London: Department for Work and Pensions.
Laing and Buisson. (2005). Care of elderly people: UK market survey 2005. London: Laing and Buisson Publications Ltd.
Leadbeater, C. (2004). Personalisation through participation. A new script for public services. London: Demos.
Leadbeater, C., Bartlett, C., & Gallagher, N. (2008). Putting people first. Facing the challenges of scaling up personal budgets. London: Demos.
Lewis, J. (2001). Older people and the health-social care boundary in the UK: Half a century of hidden policy conflict. Social Policy and Administration, 35(4), 343–359.
Lewis, J., & Glennerster, H. (1996). Implementing the new community care. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Means, R., & Smith, R. (1998). From poor law to community care: The development of welfare services for elderly people. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Means, R., Morbey, H., & Smith, R. (2002). From community care to market care? The development of welfare services for older people. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Means, R., Richards, S., & Smith, R. (2003). Community care: Policy and practice (3rd ed.). Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Moran, N., Glendinning, C., Stevens, M., Manthorpe, J., Jacobs, S., Wilberforce, M., Knapp, M., Challis, D., Fernández, J. L., Jones, K., & Netten, A. (2011). Joining up government by integrating funding streams? The experiences of the individual budget pilot projects for older and disabled people in England. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(4), 232–243.
Morris, J. (2006). Independent living: The role of the disability movement in the development of government policy. In C. Glendinning & P. A. Kemp (Eds.), Cash and care: Policy challenges in the Welfare State. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Needham, C. (2007). The reform of public services under new labour: Narratives of consumerism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Newman, J., Glendinning, C., Hughes, M. (2008). Beyond modernisation? Social care and the transformation of welfare governance. Journal of Social Policy, 37(4), 531–557.
OECD. (2005). Long-term care for older people. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Pearson, C. (2006). Direct payments in Scotland. In J. Leece & J. Bornat (Eds.), Developments in direct payments. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Prime Minister’s Strategy Unit. (2005). Improving the life chances of disabled people. London: Cabinet Office.
Royal Commission on Long-Term Care. (1999). With respect to old age: Long-term care – rights and responsibilities. London: The Stationery Office.
Schofield, P. (2007). Are there reasons to be worried about the ‘caretelisation’ of residential care? Critical Social Policy, 27(2), 155–180.
Skills for Care. (2008). Employment aspects and workforce implications of direct payments. Leeds: Skills for Care.
Skills for Care. (2010). The state of the adult social care workforce in England 2010. London: Skills for Care.
Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (Eds.). (2005). Beyond continuity. Institutional change in advanced political economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wanless, D. (2006). Securing good care for older people. Taking a long-term view. London: Kings Fund.
Windle, K., Wagland, R., Lord, K., Dickinson, A., Knapp, M., D’Amico, F., Forder, J., Henderson, C., Wistow, G., Beech, R., Roe, B., & Bowling, A. (2008). National evaluation of partnerships for older people projects: Interim report of progress. (PSSRU Discussion Paper 2612). Kent: Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent.
Young, J. (2009). The development of intermediate care services in England. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 49, S21–S25.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Glendinning, C. (2013). Long Term Care Reform in England: A Long and Unfinished Story. In: Ranci, C., Pavolini, E. (eds) Reforms in Long-Term Care Policies in Europe. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4502-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4502-9_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4501-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4502-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)